Section 3A : 2015-2016

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

bardown27 wrote:
CherryPicker99 wrote:3A games tonight.

LDC vs Delano

New Ulm vs Albert Lea

Hutch vs Mound Westonka

Windom vs Luverne

Prairie Centre vs Redwood

Morris Benson vs Marshall

Fairmont vs Worthington

Willmar vs River Lakes


Can LDC pull the upset over Delano? Should be the most intriguing game of the night. Good Luck 3A teams!
Albert Lea will beat New Ulm by at least 3
Bardown27 you still have Albert Lea?
bardown27
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:20 am

Post by bardown27 »

Whiner33 wrote:
bardown27 wrote:
CherryPicker99 wrote:3A games tonight.

LDC vs Delano

New Ulm vs Albert Lea

Hutch vs Mound Westonka

Windom vs Luverne

Prairie Centre vs Redwood

Morris Benson vs Marshall

Fairmont vs Worthington

Willmar vs River Lakes


Can LDC pull the upset over Delano? Should be the most intriguing game of the night. Good Luck 3A teams!
Albert Lea will beat New Ulm by at least 3
Bardown27 you still have Albert Lea?

yeah i do
Kinda_Normal_Tendy
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:38 am

Post by Kinda_Normal_Tendy »

notTONIGHT wrote:Anybody have any insight about the game in Litch ?

I thought LDC was for real. This overtime come from behind win leaves me doubting that notion.

What happened?
Litchfield dominated the early part of the game (and obviously the third), but really kind of tucked tail in the 2nd when a couple bounces didn't go their way. The refs put them on the pp for pretty much the last 8 minutes of the game and their top unit took advantage. New Ulm's youth/inexperience was very obvious late in the game, but even more obvious was the lack of goaltending for both teams.

As for litch being "for real", they have a very solid top line who move the puck much better than anything I can remember from litch. They also have possibly the best defenseman in the section, but not much depth after that. IMO if you want to be "for real" you need a solid goaltender and I don't see that in any team in this section besides possibly hutch if their sophomore can continue to play well and get better.
InigoMontoya
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm

Post by InigoMontoya »

besides possibly hutch if their sophomore can continue to play well and get better
It looks like the senior had 56 saves against Holy Family.
A seemingly better job than either of the STA goalies, two days later.
InigoMontoya
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm

Post by InigoMontoya »

I'm also not sure why a close win against New Ulm makes them a disappointment. That is the Eagles' only loss to date - I was contemplating a drive on Jan 8 for a little hockey and some schnitzengruben.
hawkeyguy2
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:52 pm

Post by hawkeyguy2 »

Kinda_Normal_Tendy wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:Anybody have any insight about the game in Litch ?

I thought LDC was for real. This overtime come from behind win leaves me doubting that notion.

What happened?
Litchfield dominated the early part of the game (and obviously the third), but really kind of tucked tail in the 2nd when a couple bounces didn't go their way. The refs put them on the pp for pretty much the last 8 minutes of the game and their top unit took advantage. New Ulm's youth/inexperience was very obvious late in the game, but even more obvious was the lack of goaltending for both teams.

As for litch being "for real", they have a very solid top line who move the puck much better than anything I can remember from litch. They also have possibly the best defenseman in the section, but not much depth after that. IMO if you want to be "for real" you need a solid goaltender and I don't see that in any team in this section besides possibly hutch if their sophomore can continue to play well and get better.
looking at the score sheet, shots for LDC 51 - NU 22 - it could have been one of those nights where nothing goes your way. 24 shots to 15 after two and they find themselves down 4 - 1.
hawkeyguy2
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:52 pm

Post by hawkeyguy2 »

better watch out for Willmar. This Isaac Kobiena kid can beat you single handedly. Another 2 goals tonight against Sartell on top of his 4 hat tricks. I would put them in a 4 way tie vying for 2nd in the section lumping them in with Hutch, New Ulm & LDC
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

hawkeyguy2 wrote:better watch out for Willmar. This Isaac Kobiena kid can beat you single handedly. Another 2 goals tonight against Sartell on top of his 4 hat tricks. I would put them in a 4 way tie vying for 2nd in the section lumping them in with Hutch, New Ulm & LDC

That Kids been flying. Marshall went to ot with New Ulm. Better add them in.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Who's ready to hear about how criminal it is that Luverne won by too much?

Have you guys heard Worthington is playing with 8 Skaters?

They're the real MVP. WOW!!
Corn Cobb
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 8:16 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Corn Cobb »

notTONIGHT wrote:Who's ready to hear about how criminal it is that Luverne won by too much?
By whom?
SouthernMinnFan
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:22 am

Post by SouthernMinnFan »

No Way. Pad those stats baby. You don't win scoring titles by going soft.
pats12
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:53 pm

Post by pats12 »

notTONIGHT wrote:Who's ready to hear about how criminal it is that Luverne won by too much?

Have you guys heard Worthington is playing with 8 Skaters?

They're the real MVP. WOW!!
What is your o/u on Luverne's goals tonight? I would put it at 18.
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

pats12 wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:Who's ready to hear about how criminal it is that Luverne won by too much?

Have you guys heard Worthington is playing with 8 Skaters?

They're the real MVP. WOW!!
What is your o/u on Luverne's goals tonight? I would put it at 18.
I got worthington at 2
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

SouthernMinnFan wrote:No Way. Pad those stats baby. You don't win scoring titles by going soft.
Ben HANOWSKI agrees
Corn Cobb
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 8:16 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Corn Cobb »

What's really criminal is Luverne's inability to score than 14 goals tonight.
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

Corn Cobb wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne's inability to score than 14 goals tonight.
What's really criminal is that Nobles County released you!!!
lamplighter98
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:51 am

Post by lamplighter98 »

Corn Cobb wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne's inability to score than 14 goals tonight.
Shhhh. If you weren't there or didn't listen to it, shhhhhhhhh! Luverne plays a ton of the JV kids and they get railed for only putting up 14. If they skate 3 lines, they're crucified for running the score. Aww hell, I give up!
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

lamplighter98 wrote:
Corn Cobb wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne's inability to score than 14 goals tonight.
Shhhh. If you weren't there or didn't listen to it, shhhhhhhhh! Luverne plays a ton of the JV kids and they get railed for only putting up 14. If they skate 3 lines, they're crucified for running the score. Aww hell, I give up!
You forgot the ultimate naive take... SHOULDN'T OF SCHEDULED THEM!!!!
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Whiner33 wrote:
Corn Cobb wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne's inability to score than 14 goals tonight.
What's really criminal is that Nobles County released you!!!

SHUCKED!!
Sats81
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:29 am

Post by Sats81 »

What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Sats81 wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!

In a galaxy far far away right??
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

Sats81 wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!
Sats!!! Nice win over GR pal!
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

Whiner33 wrote:
Sats81 wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!
Sats!!! Nice win over GR pal!
And Stillwa...Farmingt...Shakopee!!!!! The Worthington of the South Suburban.
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

goldy313 wrote:
Whiner33 wrote:
Sats81 wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!
Sats!!! Nice win over GR pal!
And Stillwa...Farmingt...Shakopee!!!!! The Worthington of the South Suburban.
Tell Farmingt.... To turn the horn off! The sound is deafening!
Sats81
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:29 am

Post by Sats81 »

goldy313 wrote:
Whiner33 wrote:
Sats81 wrote:What's really criminal is Luverne is a bantam b2 team at best and people give them attention. Please 3A thread go away!!!
Sats!!! Nice win over GR pal!
And Stillwa...Farmingt...Shakopee!!!!! The Worthington of the South Suburban.
Goldy. I'm still just happy they give you internet access that late. Glad to see Rochester JM is winning a few games. Maybe they can beat Lakeville south come section time.
Post Reply