New York HP 16's and 17's projections

qwerty123456789 · Post by **qwerty123456789** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:43 am

Who do you guys think will make it and represent Minnesota at National Camp?

WarmUpTheBus · Post by **WarmUpTheBus** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Paul Bitner, Shane Gersich, Tyler Nanne, Jack Glover, Jack Walker and Chase Perry made it to NTDP tryouts last year so I assume they are in.
I notice Gersich, Bitner and Glover aren't playing in the final 54.

almostashappy · Post by **almostashappy** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:33 pm

WarmUpTheBus wrote:Paul Bitner, Shane Gersich, Tyler Nanne, Jack Glover, Jack Walker and Chase Perry made it to NTDP tryouts last year so I assume they are in.
I notice Gersich, Bitner and Glover aren't playing in the final 54.

Experience teaches us that the absence of a player's name on the final 54 list does not always correlate with the absence of that player at the next level of "competition."

Bluewhitefan · Post by **Bluewhitefan** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 2:44 pm

qwerty123456789 wrote:Who do you guys think will make it and represent Minnesota at National Camp?

Mostly the same guys as last year - that's the way it's set up.

Hscout000 · Post by **Hscout000** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:28 pm

I know I will be at all the 17's games this weekend should be able to give some quick thoughts after that and hopefully I can catch most of the 16's but that is not my priority, someone else has that task. Again it is said that picks for NY are made off of the play from this weekend but everyone knows Minnesota Hockey has its favorites that no matter what will advance to NY, usually a big difference between who deserves and who actually goes.

Vapor · Post by **Vapor** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:06 pm

Again it is said that picks for NY are made off of the play from this weekend but everyone knows Minnesota Hockey has its favorites that no matter what will advance to NY, usually a big difference between who deserves and who actually

That is too bad. Kids develop at different ages and picks should be made
off of the weekends play.

Tuuk2score · Post by **Tuuk2score** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:36 pm

Are you saying some kids will develop from last weekend to this weekend ? And I thought the team is picked at the end of this weekend ?

Nuts&Bolts · Post by **Nuts&Bolts** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:53 pm

Why bother going to the games. Same names as you'd expect - branded players that play their three games maybe have an assist and make it through while lesser known kids without the name that play well over the course of three games will be sent home wondering why they don't make a team or are told to keep working hard and maybe next year.....right.

Tuuk2score · Post by **Tuuk2score** » Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:38 pm

Seems like the so called Branded names are fun to watch !!! I will pay the 15$ 20$ bucks to watch some great hockey . Not sure what a branded name is but I will have my program. maybe a * by the Branded names ? Your NUTS if your not a scout or coach watching the best kids play and BOLT and save the 20 bucks if your not a * hmmm

RRubberbeeskit · Post by **RRubberbeeskit** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:46 am

Tuuk2score wrote:Seems like the so called Branded names are fun to watch !!! I will pay the 15$ 20$ bucks to watch some great hockey . Not sure what a branded name is but I will have my program. maybe a * by the Branded names ? Your NUTS if your not a scout or coach watching the best kids play and BOLT and save the 20 bucks if your not a * hmmm

5 out 6 "Branded names" made it from Sec 2

1 of the 5 played a game and a half and still made it through.
WHL development sure seems to have enhanced one of the "Branded names" on the list. Man that kid is fast. Just imagine what 54 s will do for his development.

qwerty123456789 · Post by **qwerty123456789** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:55 pm

[quote="RRubberbeeskit"][quote="Tuuk2score"]Seems like the so called Branded names are fun to watch !!! I will pay the 15$ 20$ bucks to watch some great hockey . Not sure what a branded name is but I will have my program. maybe a * by the Branded names ? Your NUTS if your not a scout or coach watching the best kids play and BOLT and save the 20 bucks if your not a * hmmm[/quote]

5 out 6 "Branded names" made it from Sec 2

1 of the 5 played a game and a half and still made it through.
WHL development sure seems to have enhanced one of the "Branded names" on the list. Man that kid is fast. Just imagine what 54 s will do for his development.

[/quote]

who do you guys think will represent Minnesota is the question. projections anyone? branded names or not.

blueblood · Post by **blueblood** » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:29 pm

not sure what games you watched. all section 2 players played all 3 games last weekend at both age groups.

gotta axe to grind?

Mailman · Post by **Mailman** » Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:00 am

qwerty123456789 wrote:
RRubberbeeskit wrote:
Tuuk2score wrote:Seems like the so called Branded names are fun to watch !!! I will pay the 15$ 20$ bucks to watch some great hockey . Not sure what a branded name is but I will have my program. maybe a * by the Branded names ? Your NUTS if your not a scout or coach watching the best kids play and BOLT and save the 20 bucks if your not a * hmmm
5 out 6 "Branded names" made it from Sec 2 1 of the 5 played a game and a half and still made it through.
WHL development sure seems to have enhanced one of the "Branded names" on the list. Man that kid is fast. Just imagine what 54 s will do for his development.

who do you guys think will represent Minnesota is the question. projections anyone? branded names or not.

For the 17's, on defense, these five were going to NY before the first game of the <cough> "tryouts"

Any spelled wrong, I'm to lazy to look it up.

Don't know who #6 will be. Anyone ? Forwards ?

Walker
Dougherty
Wolff
Nanne
Slightham

koolio · Post by **koolio** » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:10 pm

We already know Nanne is headed to Natty/Nanne Camp thanks to Grandpa Lou who has pulled favors the last two years. It's not to imply Nanne is not good, because he is and perhaps will advance on his own merit this time around.

The #6 spot could easily be one of several quality players sitting home this weekend that were shutout and shunned by the HP (Highly Political) process. Same thing among forwards. But don't let that assoicated BS keep you from enjoying what should be a good weekend of hockey in Plymouth. Any chance of an upset in Sunday's 16/17 crossover games?

RRubberbeeskit · Post by **RRubberbeeskit** » Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:47 pm

blueblood wrote:not sure what games you watched. all section 2 players played all 3 games last weekend at both age groups.

gotta axe to grind?

Sure do gotta axe blue. You must not have watched Sec. 2s 2nd game vs Sec.6. One Sec 2 "Branded" was ejected for fighting from Sec 2s second game and suspended for his 3rd place game. Yea I know not a big deal for him he got a free pass to the 54s. Imagine that

I would hope he didnt play in the 3rd place game as it would just back up the credibility of the whole development process for MN HP hockey if he did.

Mailman · Post by **Mailman** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:20 am

RRubberbeeskit wrote:
blueblood wrote:not sure what games you watched. all section 2 players played all 3 games last weekend at both age groups.

gotta axe to grind?
Sure do gotta axe blue. You must not have watched Sec. 2s 2nd game vs Sec.6. One Sec 2 "Branded" was ejected for fighting from Sec 2s second game and suspended for his 3rd place game. Yea I know not a big deal for him he got a free pass to the 54s. Imagine that I would hope he didnt play in the 3rd place game as it would just back up the credibility of the whole development process for MN HP hockey if he did.

Who was that ?

Mailman · Post by **Mailman** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:22 am

koolio wrote:We already know Nanne is headed to Natty/Nanne Camp thanks to Grandpa Lou who has pulled favors the last two years. It's not to imply Nanne is not good, because he is and perhaps will advance on his own merit this time around.

The #6 spot could easily be one of several quality players sitting home this weekend that were shutout and shunned by the HP (Highly Political) process. Same thing among forwards. But don't let that assoicated BS keep you from enjoying what should be a good weekend of hockey in Plymouth. Any chance of an upset in Sunday's 16/17 crossover games?

Yeah, I lost a lot of respect for him after this.

RRubberbeeskit · Post by **RRubberbeeskit** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:22 am

Mailman wrote:
RRubberbeeskit wrote:
blueblood wrote:not sure what games you watched. all section 2 players played all 3 games last weekend at both age groups.

gotta axe to grind?
Sure do gotta axe blue. You must not have watched Sec. 2s 2nd game vs Sec.6. One Sec 2 "Branded" was ejected for fighting from Sec 2s second game and suspended for his 3rd place game. Yea I know not a big deal for him he got a free pass to the 54s. Imagine that I would hope he didnt play in the 3rd place game as it would just back up the credibility of the whole development process for MN HP hockey if he did.
Who was that ?

Fiddler

Mailman · Post by **Mailman** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:25 am

RRubberbeeskit wrote:
Mailman wrote:
RRubberbeeskit wrote: Sure do gotta axe blue. You must not have watched Sec. 2s 2nd game vs Sec.6. One Sec 2 "Branded" was ejected for fighting from Sec 2s second game and suspended for his 3rd place game. Yea I know not a big deal for him he got a free pass to the 54s. Imagine that I would hope he didnt play in the 3rd place game as it would just back up the credibility of the whole development process for MN HP hockey if he did.
Who was that ?
Fiddler

Thanks for the reply.

Nuts&Bolts · Post by **Nuts&Bolts** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 6:29 pm

Major penalties given? If so, do you get 2 penalty shots? Let's get rid of the penalty shots and give the team a minute PP with the face off in the offensive zone. Would be fun to see these kids run a power play and take the penalty shot out from being a deciding factor in a game.

funmom · Post by **funmom** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:19 pm

a d player from section 4 only played one game in the tournament last weekend and he made the 54's

Mailman · Post by **Mailman** » Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:39 pm

funmom wrote:a d player from section 4 only played one game in the tournament last weekend and he made the 54's

It's gotten to the point where it'd be easier to list the open spots (if any), before the fesitval, vs. the already taken ones.

Bruins · Post by **Bruins** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:52 pm

Now that 54s are done, any predictions based on the past weekend?

headshackers · Post by **headshackers** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:21 pm

17s

Nanne
Fiddler
Malmquist
Munson
Slattery
Wahlen
Phelps
Walker
Dougherty
Jaremko
Wolff
Muck

Hscout000 · Post by **Hscout000** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:43 pm

Only saw enough to give thoughts on 17's and here is who I liked with top players listed first:
Forwards:
Austin Poganski
Chase Phelps
Dylan Malmquist
William Hammer
Jack Murphy
Jake Wahlin
Jacob Jaremko
Joseph Lau
Cullen Munson
Dixon Bowen
Calvin Spencer
Lukas Gillett

Defense:
Jack Dougherty
Alexander Copa
Jack Walker
Thomas Muck
Tyler Nanne
Travis Brown

Goalie:
Robert Goor
Gabriel Heifort

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

New York HP 16's and 17's projections

New York HP 16's and 17's projections

Re: New York HP 16's and 17's projections

branded players

Re: branded players

Re: branded players

Re: branded players

Re: branded players

selects

Re: selects