North american classic Winnipeg

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:25 pm

North American Subway Classic [Winnipeg] super-elite

codemanh · Post by **codemanh** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:26 pm

old goalie85 wrote:North American Subway Classic [Winnipeg] super-elite

What about it? lol.

Good luck to the 96 legacy and other MN teams.

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:30 pm

98's MN, well represented, Icemen, Blades , and Machine. We should get one of these talented teams to place high!!!

SuperStar · Post by **SuperStar** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:21 pm

That is funny! "Super-Elites"

HockeyDad41 · Post by **HockeyDad41** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:10 pm

I'm impressed. They have a 2003 maleAAA Division.

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:01 am

Starts today. Good luck to all the Mn. kids. That legacey team looks loaded.

MNHawker · Post by **MNHawker** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:51 am

Schedule & Scores:

http://www.northamericanhockeyclassic.com/

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:53 am

Can also get rosters on that.

O-townClown · Post by **O-townClown** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:01 am

HockeyDad41 wrote:I'm impressed. They have a 2003 maleAAA Division.

My son played in a tournament in April that not only had a 2003 division, it allowed checking. Minuteman Flames event in Marlborough, Massachusetts.

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:57 am

01-blades 7 man lightning 2, 01 machine 5, s. sask selects 2------- 99 machine 6 s.e.sask bruins 1, 99 blades4 man steelers 1. MN looking good so far.

HockeyDad41 · Post by **HockeyDad41** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:54 pm

O-townClown wrote:
HockeyDad41 wrote:I'm impressed. They have a 2003 maleAAA Division.
My son played in a tournament in April that not only had a 2003 division, it allowed checking. Minuteman Flames event in Marlborough, Massachusetts.

That's aggressive.

I don't know of any '03 programs around here. I wonder if a headstart like that makes much of a difference?

HockeyDad41 · Post by **HockeyDad41** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:00 pm

I would like to have seen how the 2000 blades would have done against this field.

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:07 pm

I doubt they would have beat anyone 20 to 0....

bodman · Post by **bodman** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:03 pm

If anyone wants updates on the 96 Legacy, let me know. I am in Winnipeg. They start with a Calgary Jr. Flames team tonight at 9PM that smoked them last year (13-1 I believe). The Flames and the Saskatoon Jr. Blades are generally considered the class of western Canada. The only other Minnesota team in the 96 division is Team Torspo, but they are in the other bracket, playing in different rinks, so I can't help much with updating their games.

codemanh · Post by **codemanh** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:48 pm

bodman wrote:If anyone wants updates on the 96 Legacy, let me know. I am in Winnipeg. They start with a Calgary Jr. Flames team tonight at 9PM that smoked them last year (13-1 I believe). The Flames and the Saskatoon Jr. Blades are generally considered the class of western Canada. The only other Minnesota team in the 96 division is Team Torspo, but they are in the other bracket, playing in different rinks, so I can't help much with updating their games.

That would be nice

golemom · Post by **golemom** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:30 pm

old goalie85 wrote:I doubt they would have beat anyone 20 to 0....

goalie 85 just for you.....noticed on the winnipeg scores North Country Comets 26 and Cougar Selects 1 in the 2000 division, possible typo, or worried about tie breakers......................

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:33 pm

MUST be a misprint.... Thanks alot!!!!!! GMOM

bodman · Post by **bodman** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:21 pm

I promised an update and, as much as it pains me, here is is.

96 Calgary Jr. Flames 9, 96 Legacy 3. Pretty easy equation on this one. -The Flames were brilliant and the Legacy was pretty awful. It was tied 2-2 after the first period. That is when the implosion began. Final shots were 52-30 in favor of Calgary, but the quality of the shots was the real story. I have never seen a team consistently find a way to get the puck to an open man in front like the Flames did. I think the Legacy goalie was on a first name basis with the Flame forwards. They are a phenomonal team.

Now lets see if the Legacy can regroup and get a couple wins tomorrow against the Manitoba Jr. Steelers (Legacy beat them twice in a tourney earlier this year 5-0 and 6-1) andthe Vancouver Selects (another very talented squad).

Time for sleep.

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:39 pm

Wow... would have thought we would have beat them. [Still a ton of games left] #Wow # I thought that team of mn's had it dicked11

bodman · Post by **bodman** » Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:25 pm

96 Legacy 9, Manitoba Jr. Steelers 6.

Legacy jumped ahead 7-2 and held on. Next up, the Vancouver Selects tonight at 9PM.

codemanh · Post by **codemanh** » Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:27 pm

bodman wrote:96 Legacy 9, Manitoba Jr. Steelers 6.

Legacy jumped ahead 7-2 and held on. Next up, the Vancouver Selects tonight at 9PM.

Great! Good luck tonight, boys!

EXPRO · Post by **EXPRO** » Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:25 am

HockeyDad41 wrote:I would like to have seen how the 2000 blades would have done against this field.

Also that Elite team they call the 2000 Icemen. How would they have done against the field of teams like the Vipers, Torspo, Vancouver Selects, and other brick teams, we know they can't keep up with the Machine which I would consider the best 2000 team in Minnesota, not to mention the U.S.

TGO · Post by **TGO** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:41 pm

This was excellent hockey at all levels!

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

North american classic Winnipeg

North american classic Winnipeg

Re: North american classic Winnipeg

let them play

Re: let them play