This outta give you my answer......ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:That is correct. GFD, Do you want to play some poker this weekend? Cheap gambling lessons available.Goldfishdude wrote:deacon wrote: there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.Deacon.. is that accurate??? Doesn't that mean that Roseau gets 1.5 goals added to their score, so they could actually lose 4-3, but when you add the 1.5 goals, they win 4.5-4?? They don't have to win by 2 goals, do they??the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
In football, if the Vikes are favorited by 6 points over the Bears, and you take the Bears +6, If the Vikes win the game 21-17, I covered with the +6 as the Bears now would win the odds of 23-21.
http://www.entertonement.com/clips/chsk ... ngerfield-