vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

iwearmysunglassesatnight
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:07 pm

vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines

Post by iwearmysunglassesatnight »

I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays

Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)

02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)

07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)

09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
Was a duster and paying for it?????
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Re: vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines

Post by Sparlimb »

iwearmysunglassesatnight wrote:I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays

Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)

02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)

07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)

09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
At least they spelled Hill-Murray right.
Roseauverrated
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:37 pm

Post by Roseauverrated »

Can someone interpret this? I have no idea what those numbers mean.
fivehole628
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:56 pm

Re: vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines

Post by fivehole628 »

iwearmysunglassesatnight wrote:I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays

Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)

02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)

07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)

09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
You might have the longest name in the history of the forums :lol:
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

Roseauverrated wrote:Can someone interpret this? I have no idea what those numbers mean.
It's kinda like this:

Let's use the Edina game.

the 1101 just is the betting #.

Edina -1.5
Roseau +1.5

Means you expect Edina to win by more than 1.5 goals. If you don't think so, then bet on Roseau to lose by 1 or win.

Edina (-150) means you have to bet $150 to win $100.
Roseau (+110) means fot a $100 bet, you win $110

I don't know the Team Spreads $500 ML

I gather that $200 is the largest bet.... So, if you bet $200 on Roseau +1.5 and they win, you would profit $220.
blueblood
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 8:36 am

interpretting odds

Post by blueblood »

If I remember correctly, this is how you read the odds/lines:

The first number is the line & establishes the favorite. In game 1, Edina is a 1 1/2 goal favorite over Roseau, meaning Edina must win by two or more goals to cover any bets for Edina.

The second number is the wager amount. In this case, if you think Edina is going to win by 2 or more goals, you would need to bet $150.00 to win $100.00. If you think Roseau will cover the spread (lose by 1 or win), then you need to bet $100 to win $110.00.

Not sure about max, but with $200.00 listed, that may mean the max bet or winnings is 2X.
Play Like a Champion Today
codemanh
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:43 pm

Re: interpretting odds

Post by codemanh »

blueblood wrote:If I remember correctly, this is how you read the odds/lines:

The first number is the line & establishes the favorite. In game 1, Edina is a 1 1/2 goal favorite over Roseau, meaning Edina must win by two or more goals to cover any bets for Edina.

The second number is the wager amount. In this case, if you think Edina is going to win by 2 or more goals, you would need to bet $150.00 to win $100.00. If you think Roseau will cover the spread (lose by 1 or win), then you need to bet $100 to win $110.00.

Not sure about max, but with $200.00 listed, that may mean the max bet or winnings is 2X.
so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
OGEE OGELTHORPE
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: State of shock/without the awe

Post by OGEE OGELTHORPE »

Goldfishdude wrote:
Roseauverrated wrote:Can someone interpret this? I have no idea what those numbers mean.
It's kinda like this:

Let's use the Edina game.

the 1101 just is the betting #.

Edina -1.5
Roseau +1.5

Means you expect Edina to win by more than 1.5 goals. If you don't think so, then bet on Roseau to lose by 1 or win.

Edina (-150) means you have to bet $150 to win $100.
Roseau (+110) means fot a $100 bet, you win $110

I don't know the Team Spreads $500 ML

I gather that $200 is the largest bet.... So, if you bet $200 on Roseau +1.5 and they win, you would profit $220.
O-Town is that you?

:lol:
council member retired
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Nordeast Mpls

Re: interpretting odds

Post by council member retired »

so what if you bet on Roseau to win?[/quote]

there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game

only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.

Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS

If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
council member retired
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Nordeast Mpls

Post by council member retired »

i will try my state trny bushel of 20 pucks

edina -1.5 -150 two pucks to win 1.5 potatoes
apple valley +2.5 -120 5 pucks to win 4 potatoes
tonka -4.5 -120 10 pucks to win 8 potatoes
duluth east +1.5 +120 two pucks to win 2.5 potatoes
total played 19 pucks, to win 16
HomeBarkingDog
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by HomeBarkingDog »

this has to be fake..where are you getting these lines from

that being said,

Im running to the bank to get a loan to take Tonka
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

It's not Las Vegas, probably offshore. Las Vegas odds are always listed in Pacific coast time, these would be in Pacific Standard Time and they're not, they're East Coast Standard Time.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

HomeBarkingDog wrote:this has to be fake..where are you getting these lines from

that being said,

Im running to the bank to get a loan to take Tonka
That means you will have to bet $120 to win $100 and Tonka will have to beat Lakeville by 5... You sure Tonka will win by 5?

OGEE???? You hurt my feelings calling me O-Town Clown.. :cry: :cry:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm

Post by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER »

Lesson Time.

CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.

As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.

Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
deacon
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: interpretting odds

Post by deacon »

council member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game

only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.

Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS

If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.[/quote]

the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
HomeBarkingDog
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by HomeBarkingDog »

Goldfishdude wrote:
HomeBarkingDog wrote:this has to be fake..where are you getting these lines from

that being said,

Im running to the bank to get a loan to take Tonka
That means you will have to bet $120 to win $100 and Tonka will have to beat Lakeville by 5... You sure Tonka will win by 5?

OGEE???? You hurt my feelings calling me O-Town Clown.. :cry: :cry:
of course im not SURE. its gambling..but I think it will happen

Id also put money on Apple Valley +2.5
northwoods oldtimer
Posts: 2679
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm

Post by northwoods oldtimer »

goldy313 wrote:It's not Las Vegas, probably offshore. Las Vegas odds are always listed in Pacific coast time, these would be in Pacific Standard Time and they're not, they're East Coast Standard Time.
Russian Mafia :!:
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:Lesson Time.

CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.

As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.

Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
However, Formerie, notice that the +4.5 for Lakeville still carries the same money risk of betting $120 to win $100 as it's counterpart, Tonka.. Does that tell me the Vegas oddsmakers still want me to bet on Tonka?? For example, if Tonka was (-150) and Lakeville (+160), wouldn't that entice me to bet on Lakeville if i was convinced they would cover??
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm

Post by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER »

Goldfishdude wrote:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:Lesson Time.

CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.

As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.

Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
However, Formerie, notice that the +4.5 for Lakeville still carries the same money risk of betting $120 to win $100 as it's counterpart, Tonka.. Does that tell me the Vegas oddsmakers still want me to bet on Tonka?? For example, if Tonka was (-150) and Lakeville (+160), wouldn't that entice me to bet on Lakeville if i was convinced they would cover??
Those are the odds that are trying to convince exactly half the people to bet on each team.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: interpretting odds

Post by Goldfishdude »

deacon wrote:
council member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game

only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.

Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS

If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
Deacon.. is that accurate??? Doesn't that mean that Roseau gets 1.5 goals added to their score, so they could actually lose 4-3, but when you add the 1.5 goals, they win 4.5-4?? They don't have to win by 2 goals, do they??

In football, if the Vikes are favorited by 6 points over the Bears, and you take the Bears +6, If the Vikes win the game 21-17, I covered with the +6 as the Bears now would win the odds of 23-21.
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm

Re: interpretting odds

Post by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER »

Goldfishdude wrote:
deacon wrote:
council member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game

only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.

Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS

If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
Deacon.. is that accurate??? Doesn't that mean that Roseau gets 1.5 goals added to their score, so they could actually lose 4-3, but when you add the 1.5 goals, they win 4.5-4?? They don't have to win by 2 goals, do they??

In football, if the Vikes are favorited by 6 points over the Bears, and you take the Bears +6, If the Vikes win the game 21-17, I covered with the +6 as the Bears now would win the odds of 23-21.
That is correct. GFD, Do you want to play some poker this weekend? Cheap gambling lessons available.
bardown30
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:32 pm

Post by bardown30 »

How about a link to where these came from? Just curious!
eagle4life9
Posts: 462
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:28 am

Post by eagle4life9 »

I hate the .5's. It takes the push out of play. I love the push.
pioneerhockey12
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:13 pm

Post by pioneerhockey12 »

you can still pick push but its just a little riskier play
eagle4life9
Posts: 462
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:28 am

Post by eagle4life9 »

It would probably be the riskiest play you can make. But hey, you never know what can happen. Lakeville North could even win. :shock:
Post Reply