vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:07 pm
vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines
I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays
Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)
02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)
07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)
09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)
02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)
07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)
09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
Was a duster and paying for it?????
Re: vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines
At least they spelled Hill-Murray right.iwearmysunglassesatnight wrote:I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays
Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)
02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)
07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)
09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)
-
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:37 pm
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:56 pm
Re: vegas posting highschool AA Trny lines
You might have the longest name in the history of the forumsiwearmysunglassesatnight wrote:I guess they will take a wager on anything nowadays
Minnesota High School Hockey - Minnesota Playoffs - Thursday, March 11
Teams Spread - $500 ML - $500 Total - $500
12:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #2 Edina (20-6-2) vs Roseau (22-5-1) MAX $200
1101 Edina -1½ (-150)
1102 Roseau +1½ (+110)
02:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #3 Blaine (21-4-3) vs Apple Valley (17-11-0) MAX $200
1103 Blaine -2½ (-120)
1104 Apple Valley +2½ (-120)
07:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #1 Minnetonka (25-1-2) vs Lakeville North (11-15-2) MAX $200
1105 Minnetonka -4½ (-120)
1106 Lakeville North +4½ (-120)
09:00PM Class AA Quarterfinal: #4 Hill-Murray vs Duluth East (19-5-4) MAX $200
1107 Hill-Murray -1½ (-160)
1108 Duluth East +1½ (+120)

-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
It's kinda like this:Roseauverrated wrote:Can someone interpret this? I have no idea what those numbers mean.
Let's use the Edina game.
the 1101 just is the betting #.
Edina -1.5
Roseau +1.5
Means you expect Edina to win by more than 1.5 goals. If you don't think so, then bet on Roseau to lose by 1 or win.
Edina (-150) means you have to bet $150 to win $100.
Roseau (+110) means fot a $100 bet, you win $110
I don't know the Team Spreads $500 ML
I gather that $200 is the largest bet.... So, if you bet $200 on Roseau +1.5 and they win, you would profit $220.
interpretting odds
If I remember correctly, this is how you read the odds/lines:
The first number is the line & establishes the favorite. In game 1, Edina is a 1 1/2 goal favorite over Roseau, meaning Edina must win by two or more goals to cover any bets for Edina.
The second number is the wager amount. In this case, if you think Edina is going to win by 2 or more goals, you would need to bet $150.00 to win $100.00. If you think Roseau will cover the spread (lose by 1 or win), then you need to bet $100 to win $110.00.
Not sure about max, but with $200.00 listed, that may mean the max bet or winnings is 2X.
The first number is the line & establishes the favorite. In game 1, Edina is a 1 1/2 goal favorite over Roseau, meaning Edina must win by two or more goals to cover any bets for Edina.
The second number is the wager amount. In this case, if you think Edina is going to win by 2 or more goals, you would need to bet $150.00 to win $100.00. If you think Roseau will cover the spread (lose by 1 or win), then you need to bet $100 to win $110.00.
Not sure about max, but with $200.00 listed, that may mean the max bet or winnings is 2X.
Play Like a Champion Today
Re: interpretting odds
so what if you bet on Roseau to win?blueblood wrote:If I remember correctly, this is how you read the odds/lines:
The first number is the line & establishes the favorite. In game 1, Edina is a 1 1/2 goal favorite over Roseau, meaning Edina must win by two or more goals to cover any bets for Edina.
The second number is the wager amount. In this case, if you think Edina is going to win by 2 or more goals, you would need to bet $150.00 to win $100.00. If you think Roseau will cover the spread (lose by 1 or win), then you need to bet $100 to win $110.00.
Not sure about max, but with $200.00 listed, that may mean the max bet or winnings is 2X.
-
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:44 pm
- Location: State of shock/without the awe
O-Town is that you?Goldfishdude wrote:It's kinda like this:Roseauverrated wrote:Can someone interpret this? I have no idea what those numbers mean.
Let's use the Edina game.
the 1101 just is the betting #.
Edina -1.5
Roseau +1.5
Means you expect Edina to win by more than 1.5 goals. If you don't think so, then bet on Roseau to lose by 1 or win.
Edina (-150) means you have to bet $150 to win $100.
Roseau (+110) means fot a $100 bet, you win $110
I don't know the Team Spreads $500 ML
I gather that $200 is the largest bet.... So, if you bet $200 on Roseau +1.5 and they win, you would profit $220.

-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Nordeast Mpls
Re: interpretting odds
so what if you bet on Roseau to win?[/quote]
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the game
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Nordeast Mpls
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:33 pm
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
That means you will have to bet $120 to win $100 and Tonka will have to beat Lakeville by 5... You sure Tonka will win by 5?HomeBarkingDog wrote:this has to be fake..where are you getting these lines from
that being said,
Im running to the bank to get a loan to take Tonka
OGEE???? You hurt my feelings calling me O-Town Clown..


-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm
Lesson Time.
CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.
As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.
Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.
As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.
Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
Re: interpretting odds
there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the gamecouncil member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.[/quote]
the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:33 pm
of course im not SURE. its gambling..but I think it will happenGoldfishdude wrote:That means you will have to bet $120 to win $100 and Tonka will have to beat Lakeville by 5... You sure Tonka will win by 5?HomeBarkingDog wrote:this has to be fake..where are you getting these lines from
that being said,
Im running to the bank to get a loan to take Tonka
OGEE???? You hurt my feelings calling me O-Town Clown..![]()
Id also put money on Apple Valley +2.5
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
However, Formerie, notice that the +4.5 for Lakeville still carries the same money risk of betting $120 to win $100 as it's counterpart, Tonka.. Does that tell me the Vegas oddsmakers still want me to bet on Tonka?? For example, if Tonka was (-150) and Lakeville (+160), wouldn't that entice me to bet on Lakeville if i was convinced they would cover??ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:Lesson Time.
CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.
As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.
Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm
Those are the odds that are trying to convince exactly half the people to bet on each team.Goldfishdude wrote:However, Formerie, notice that the +4.5 for Lakeville still carries the same money risk of betting $120 to win $100 as it's counterpart, Tonka.. Does that tell me the Vegas oddsmakers still want me to bet on Tonka?? For example, if Tonka was (-150) and Lakeville (+160), wouldn't that entice me to bet on Lakeville if i was convinced they would cover??ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:Lesson Time.
CRM, 5 to 1 odds for a money is not happening even in the Tonka game. Money lines are also not listed as odds. They are listed as +/- cash.
Example for tomorrow night. The Caps are huge favorites over the Canes. Money line is currently.
Caps -285
Canes 245
You must bet $285 to win $100 on the Caps.
A $100 on the Canes pays $245.
As far as the spreads. -4.5 is huge in betting terms. The -1.5 are slight favorites and is what is usually assigned the home team when two teams are interchangeable on neutral ice. Since this is neutral ice they would be considered slight favs in betting terms.
Teams Spread - $500 ML
This means the max you can bet on the spreads in a Money Line Parlay is $500. In this case it could also mean you can only bet $500 in total action for all four games considering the $200 per game max.
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: interpretting odds
deacon wrote:there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the gamecouncil member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.
Deacon.. is that accurate??? Doesn't that mean that Roseau gets 1.5 goals added to their score, so they could actually lose 4-3, but when you add the 1.5 goals, they win 4.5-4?? They don't have to win by 2 goals, do they??the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
In football, if the Vikes are favorited by 6 points over the Bears, and you take the Bears +6, If the Vikes win the game 21-17, I covered with the +6 as the Bears now would win the odds of 23-21.
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm
Re: interpretting odds
That is correct. GFD, Do you want to play some poker this weekend? Cheap gambling lessons available.Goldfishdude wrote:deacon wrote:there is no Roseau money line, i.e. winner of the gamecouncil member retired wrote:so what if you bet on Roseau to win?
only Roseau to not lose by 3 goals, I.E. +2.5 Goals.
Like the Olympics they only use the puck line to start. + / - GOALS
If they had a money line, Roseau to be a straight winner it would probably be lay $1 to win $5, maximum bet would remain $200.Deacon.. is that accurate??? Doesn't that mean that Roseau gets 1.5 goals added to their score, so they could actually lose 4-3, but when you add the 1.5 goals, they win 4.5-4?? They don't have to win by 2 goals, do they??the money line for Roseau is +110, bet $100 to win 110, meaning they are an underdog. Roseau is +1.5 so if you bet Roseau @ +1.5, they need win by 2 goals. If you bet Roseau @ +110, they just need to win the game by any margin.
In football, if the Vikes are favorited by 6 points over the Bears, and you take the Bears +6, If the Vikes win the game 21-17, I covered with the +6 as the Bears now would win the odds of 23-21.
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:28 am
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:13 pm
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:28 am