St Thomas Academy (18-4-1) @ South St Paul (16-4-3) 2-17-09

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:31 pm

The first meeting at the St Thomas Ice Arena ended in a 1-1 tie.

A Cadet victory seals their win on the conference and the #1 seed in the section.

A Packer victory will give SSP a shot at tying St Thomas for the conference title (pending a Maht victory over STA in their last game of the season) and the #1 seed in section 4A.

A tie would give St Thomas the conference title and 2nd place most likely to South St Paul. What it would do for the section rankings one could only guess.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:02 pm

Wilcox let in 3 against NSP yesterday. Something to worry about?

cjmhockey19 · Post by **cjmhockey19** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:29 pm

NSP got some fluky goals, I think Wilcox will be ready for STA on Tuesday

hockeyroyals · Post by **hockeyroyals** » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:30 pm

Wilcox always plays big in the biggest games...it will be a great game to watch too

Rossbury21 · Post by **Rossbury21** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:11 am

South St. Paul will probably get a decent crowd at Wakota. If Wilcox plays like he can then it will be a good game.

South St. Paul 3(en)
St. Thomas Academy 1

mnhockey73 · Post by **mnhockey73** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:17 am

Either way it should be an incredible game to watch. I would personally like to see South St. Paul come out on top, then they might have a chance at winning the Conference!

Husky88 · Post by **Husky88** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:54 am

Consider SSP very fortunate to come out of the NSP game with a OT win .... If Wilcox didn't make some great saves, NSP would have had another 3 or 4 goals.

I do think that SSP will beat STA in a low scoring affair.

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:58 am

Cadets by 2

Lucia4President · Post by **Lucia4President** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:42 pm

South St Paul 4
St Thomas Academy 3

DotaDangler · Post by **DotaDangler** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:47 pm

All depends on Wilcox. Don't see SSP scoring many

STA-3
SSP-1

Hockeywatcher123 · Post by **Hockeywatcher123** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:11 pm

It should be a great game! It will depend on how wilcoxs plays. I think if sta crashes the net hard they will win. Wilcox is a great goalie but he does give up a lot of rebounds.

STA 2
SSP 1

dherman8 · Post by **dherman8** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:14 pm

Does this one mean anything? Can't wait until the Packers split the Cadets in half in the section final!

DotaDangler · Post by **DotaDangler** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:21 pm

dherman8 wrote:Does this one mean anything? Can't wait until the Packers split the Cadets in half in the section final!

If SSP wins it will be by one goal, their offense just isnt that good

deacon · Post by **deacon** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:36 pm

is this game at Wakota (sp?) and at 7:30?

TheSniper09 · Post by **TheSniper09** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:31 pm

any word on the game?

deacon · Post by **deacon** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:52 pm

5-0 Cadets when I left with a minutes to go in the third period and I think SSP was on a power play. I was only able to watch the third period. STA scored 3 goals in the third period, AJ Reid scoring 2 of them I believe. STA dominated the third except for the first 2 minutes when SSP was on a power play, other than that they were barely in the Cadets zone.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:59 pm

Looks like the Cadets rounded up their first title of the season

keepyourheadup · Post by **keepyourheadup** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:04 am

Nice game for St. Lakeville, all points to x lakeville skaters.

deacon · Post by **deacon** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:11 pm

^^^hater^^^

dherman8 · Post by **dherman8** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:33 pm

keepyourheadup wrote:Nice game for St. Lakeville, all points to x lakeville skaters.

For real?

keepyourheadup · Post by **keepyourheadup** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:21 pm

nope not a hater, that topic has been beaten to death. Yes for real.

deacon · Post by **deacon** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:25 pm

Schroeder (1g, 2a), Crandall (1g, 2a), Reid (2g, 1a), Kroska (1g)

captaincrunch · Post by **captaincrunch** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:47 pm

It was a really fun game to watch! STA was flying last night seemed as though they had something to prove (there gonna get 4A) SSP did do a pretty good job shuting down Isacson though but SSP had an awful offensive game from what i have seen from them in past games. Wilcox played a good game..nothing much the kid could do.

Saywhat?03 · Post by **Saywhat?03** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:10 pm

It was a really fun game to watch! STA was flying last night seemed as though they had something to prove (there gonna get 4A) SSP did do a pretty good job shuting down Isacson though but SSP had an awful offensive game from what i have seen from them in past games. Wilcox played a good game..nothing much the kid could do.

Yeah they did a good job shutting him down... considering he shut himself down and didnt even play in the game. He was sick and couldnt play. Maybe you were watching another game.

captaincrunch · Post by **captaincrunch** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:48 pm

Isent he #12? My buddy i went with said he was #12 and i didn't grab a roster, my mistake..no wonder i didn't hear his name in the starting line ups i was a little confused during the national anthem why he wouldn't be starting. Well i just looked on the star tribune website and #12 is definantly not isacson ha ha. I'm getting old

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

St Thomas Academy (18-4-1) @ South St Paul (16-4-3) 2-17-09

Who wins?

St Thomas Academy (18-4-1) @ South St Paul (16-4-3) 2-17-09