maht hasn't even played sibley or NSPGovs93 wrote:Congrats on the wins over Sibley and NSP by the way.sachishi4 wrote:once mahtomedi plays in a tough conference we can talk
Mahtomedi anyone??
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
Hockeygod54
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:53 pm
-
Hockeygod54
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:53 pm
uhh dude u need to get a life...maybe sign off this forum every few days.jbhagel81 wrote:agreed to the max. first of all. no one on here said mahtomedi sucks, all we said is so far we arent giving them any credit. Tessia, you said that if they lose to hill and STA then we should still give them credit? no doubt, they probably wont beat either of those teams. but i would give them credit if they did, but if they lose. why should I? im not saying they would suck cause they cant beat them, but im saying losing to a team gains you nothing. Im pretty sure your from hill, and yeah, you guys are good and really love to talk alot of crap about other teams dont you? no one ever said anything after the tartan loss, even the 2nd best fall down sometimes. i cant wait to see STA and HILL play on the 10th. then we will see who is the better team, and i can tell you mahtomedi will not win their conference, and probably wont go to state.mabybe you should re-look at what everyone said. and it really comes down to one MAJOR point we all can agree on. beat the good teams in the good conferences, we will talk. granted they are in a good conference with STA AND Hill, to bad they probably wont beat either of those teams, sorry to say. and as for white bear. keep ripping on em. us white bear fans really love it. no one can deny we are a threat. even hill murray kids say we could beat you in sections.we are 7-4(countin schwanns cup) which is a pretty good record in my book. and have played some pretty challlenging teams. find one point in that argument thats wrong. but thats just my opinion.MNsGreatest#2 wrote:How come it seems like every third thread in this forum proves that HM posters on here represent their team in the worst of ways? They are always attacking other schools, making them seem completely inferior because Hill beat them. Everyone needs to be able to accept different opinions. And HM fans must also remember, they arnt perfect. I mean they did lose to the mighty Tartan.
Easy there toughguy... I was standing up for Mahtomedi and talking about HM. Look who my quote was directed to.Hockeygod54 wrote:maht hasn't even played sibley or NSPGovs93 wrote:Congrats on the wins over Sibley and NSP by the way.sachishi4 wrote:once mahtomedi plays in a tough conference we can talk
Hill is AA. The next 3 best CSC teams this year are probably all A teams, unless you put Tartan ahead of one of them. This makes it a decent conf. for an A team like Maht. who is being ranked against teams like Mankato West, Warroad, Breck, RW, who all play worse schedules than Mahtomedi. Not the case for Hill who is being ranked with Tonka, Roseau, Blaine, etc.sachishi4 wrote:i have never said the classic suburban is any good. never. its horrible.
im just pointing out the fact that if people say mahto is good they should look at the conference because if i was to make a thread saying how good HM is, people would be tearing me limb to limb about the conference play.