Vick

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:36 pm

Obviously since you quoted something I said. Not too good at ignoring are ya?

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:52 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:Obviously since you quoted something I said. Not too good at ignoring are ya?

Quit nitpicking and stay on topic, would ya? Sheesh... I hate when people stray off topic.

Back to Vick...

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:01 pm

Speaking of Irony it seems odd that the NAACP is crying for (Society) to lighten up on this, this organization is all about the advancement

Vick had a 130 million $ contract I'd say he really doesn't need any help with advancement.... what he needs is Pop's Sandford "How'd ya like me ta slap you upside yo head"

I don't know much about his past or youth but I think this was one of these rags to riches fairy tales, maybe it's true you just can't get away from your upbringing and are destined to repeat it...what a waste.

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:08 pm

Agree.

I think it shows that we are in pretty good shape if all the NAACP has to do these days is protect Michael Vick.

The race card is played too much these days and almost always under the wrong circumstances. Not good for anybody.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:43 am

As if it isn't bad enough for this poor guy, now he's being sued for "$63,000,000,000 billion" for trying to obtain missles from Iran.

Personally, I think the guy going after him has a real shot of winning. I mean honestly.... to have Michael Vick subject you to microwave testing is just plain rude.

theref · Post by **theref** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:34 pm

Uh-Oh, Mikey V's boys just rolled over on him and left him with very little options. I guess we are going to find out if Mike is the Top Dog in all this. I wonder if they will make his prison uniform number 7 for him....I agree with the thought that you just can't change where some people come from. I mean, look at his brother, it seemed it was only a matter of time.

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:53 pm

what were they doing over on vicks property anyways? dont you need a warrant for that

EREmpireStrikesBack · Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:53 am

dangla. wrote:what were they doing over on vicks property anyways? dont you need a warrant for that

What?

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:44 am

dangla, yes, they do, but I'm guessing they had one.

Any word of what's going on currently?

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:03 pm

Vick owns the property, finances the entire operation, and his "partners" plea bargain against him.
With friends like that, you don't need enemies.
I haven't seen anyone whiz away so much money since Mike Tyson.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:00 pm

grindiangrad-80 wrote: I haven't seen anyone whiz away so much money since Mike Tyson.

The King of "Whiz Away" has to be Onterrio Smith!

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:36 pm

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:35 pm

To bad Vick couldn't hire O.J. Simpsons lawyers?

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:27 pm

Yeah, it doesn't seem he'll get away scotch free and it just baffles me how you can kill two people with no punishment but then when you kill dogs you have to go to jail.

Post by **east hockey** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:05 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:Yeah, it doesn't seem he'll get away scotch free and it just baffles me how you can kill two people with no punishment but then when you kill dogs you have to go to jail.

Scotch free? Heh.

Lee

EREmpireStrikesBack · Post by **EREmpireStrikesBack** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:25 pm

east hockey wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:Yeah, it doesn't seem he'll get away scotch free and it just baffles me how you can kill two people with no punishment but then when you kill dogs you have to go to jail.
Scotch free? Heh.

Lee

Amen to that.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:29 pm

Umm.... he gets a trial??? Just like OJ !!! so who knows what will happen??
His lawyers and money will determine the outcome.
HSW I thought you were the person who said innocent until proven guilty..or wait, was it?.......ah never mind that was Bonds that needs to prove he's innocent of something he's not charged with.

BTW
I've been Scotch free for a long time...however a good Crown Royal on ice is nice.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:37 pm

CNT, if you have been living in a box and not turned on a TV or picked up a paper, then I will inform you that just about everywhere has said that instead of going to trial he is likely to take a plea, which would include some jail time.

He may get off with nothing, but probably not. Just going from what I've seen/read.

Not going to change the thread, but what world are you living where they are not looking to charge Bonds with anything? Yes, maybe not charged at the moment, but they are looking to charge him with perjury and some other stuff.

Yes, I'm aware OJ lost in civil court, but that's not anything to a guy with the money.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:23 am

HShockeywatcher wrote:CNT, if you have been living in a box and not turned on a TV or picked up a paper, then I will inform you that just about everywhere has said that instead of going to trial he is likely to take a plea, which would include some jail time.

He may get off with nothing, but probably not. Just going from what I've seen/read.

Not going to change the thread, but what world are you living where they are not looking to charge Bonds with anything? Yes, maybe not charged at the moment, but they are looking to charge him with perjury and some other stuff.

Yes, I'm aware OJ lost in civil court, but that's not anything to a guy with the money.

No I've been on Minnhock day and night.

The media is so reliable...BTW "who is evertwhere"? also Knowlzee's box was full so I'm on the waiting list.
And again Bonds has not been charged...If's, and's, & maybe don't count, so he doesn't have to prove anything until such time.
And...
OJ he won the case that mattered to him...and money made all the difference.
He has not paid a dime of the civil suit from what I understand so all in all he won that too!
Thanks for the info..not that it's at all informative

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:03 pm

Looks like he's going to go ahead and take a plea deal

If you trust John Clayton (and I don't... at all), if Vick ever gets back into the NFL, one of the first teams to give him a look might be the Vikes. I don't know how he gets away with writing this crap. If he's ever allowed back (yeah right), and if Jackson doesn't work out, and if Childress is still here, and despite the fact he can't run a west coast offense, sure... put him purple. WHAT...

dangla. · Post by **dangla.** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:24 pm

12-18 month thats was john clayton said.

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:38 pm

Govs93 wrote:Looks like he's going to go ahead and take a plea deal

If you trust John Clayton (and I don't... at all), if Vick ever gets back into the NFL, one of the first teams to give him a look might be the Vikes. I don't know how he gets away with writing this crap. If he's ever allowed back (yeah right), and if Jackson doesn't work out, and if Childress is still here, and despite the fact he can't run a west coast offense, sure... put him purple. WHAT...

That would go against the Childress system of having "character" people 1st, and good players second. He would have a tough time selling that one to anyone. IMHO

eazy1415 · Post by **eazy1415** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:26 pm

It is all over for Vick.. He has (or had) everything but he wanted to get involved with dog fighting. The worst waste is wasted talent!

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:33 pm

Anyone know anything about the judge? It sounds like it's all up in the air right now.

One thing that I don't agree with that I saw on ESPN today is that if he were to get a suspension from the NFL they would have him serve it after he gets out of jail. Not that I support him or what he did, that doesn't seem right. If the NFL wants to suspend him, then suspend him. Don't wait until he's out of jail, that's punishing him twice.

Undercover Hockey Lover · Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am

HShockeywatcher wrote:One thing that I don't agree with that I saw on ESPN today is that if he were to get a suspension from the NFL they would have him serve it after he gets out of jail. Not that I support him or what he did, that doesn't seem right. If the NFL wants to suspend him, then suspend him. Don't wait until he's out of jail, that's punishing him twice.

I disagree.... the NFL is trying to clean up its "Boyz will be Boyz" image and as a business they have the right to do whatever they want to promote a fast, exciting, rough and tough sport but with a somewhat "cleaner cut" image. The new "America's Pastime". I think people are tired of the Vick, Phillips, Carruth, Ricky Williams, Moss, Pacman, Ray Lewis, LT (in his crack days) and the Vikes Love Boat garbage that pops to the top of the headlines. Sad to say......do you see a pattern here