Blaine vs. Burnsville
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Blaine vs. Burnsville
I'M PICKING Blaine over Burn. 5-4...Beaudette and Lynch (& #6) have been playing really well (especially Lynch) and the Johnson, Schaber & #33 line (which combined for just 1 goal in three Section games) has to come back to life...Carson & Hickey are strong D and Hollerud is playing well...Burnsville had a great win against AHA...my hat is off to them...but Blaine has more experience in these kind of games.BIGSEXY wrote:I find it hard to believe that that first line can be better than Blaine's (they weren't the first meeting, Blaine 7-3). Also, I know Blaine has the better second line with Schaber, Johnson and Bailey. I will stick with my Bengals in this one.Rbkhockey21 wrote:Their first line of W-Barns C- Hendrickson W- Parisic(sorry sp?), they are a damn good line. Other than that they arnt very deep..to beat them you need to match their first line and then be able to have a 2nd and 3rd line who can bury the puck.
Im going to take![]()
Burnsville-3
Blaine-2
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:35 pm
- Location: In the Box
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
I'm picking Blaine to win this one, but I wouldn't be surprised if Burnsville won. They are probably the hottest team in the state. It wasn't a fluke that they beat AHA. Janne Kivihalme has done a fabulous job of turning this team around, winning 13 of there last 14. I think they might be just happy to be there, and have a let down after the AHA win.
i know a lot of people think blaine will win becasue they beat burnsville 7-3 earlier this year in the scwans cup. there are a few things about that game that most people dont know. first the game was played while the blaze were playing the worst hockey of the season, and the blaze did not play their hot goalie randy johnson who everyone is talking about and their hot line which also is getting alot of attention was not playing together (perisic was playing second line). ever scince that line has been together they have been unstoppable
Blaze 5
Bengals 4
Blaze 5
Bengals 4
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:28 am
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:52 am
I think burnsville has a very good first line but thats about all they got and besides that i think blaines first line is even better to go along with a very good second line...something burnsville does not have...the way it looks to me i dont think burnsville will be able to keep up with the bengals
Blaine-6
Burnsville3
but you never know the with way that burnsville goalie can play
Blaine-6
Burnsville3
but you never know the with way that burnsville goalie can play
B'ville
B'ville's 2nd and 3rd line have had trouble scoring,theres alot of players there that have had some success in the past,and are capable of being big contributors,they have been matched up against opposing teams 1st line's and shut them down,anyone of these kids are capable of stepping up and having big games,if that happens no one will stop them.
GO BLAZE!!!!!!!!!!!! 6-3
Peresic was about the last choice for this line the coaches tried a number of kids at his spot,he delivered,the other lines will jell thursday night.watch some of these kids Z. KING,GUS,Al Jhonson they will deliver!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
________
BLACK MILF
GO BLAZE!!!!!!!!!!!! 6-3
Peresic was about the last choice for this line the coaches tried a number of kids at his spot,he delivered,the other lines will jell thursday night.watch some of these kids Z. KING,GUS,Al Jhonson they will deliver!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
________
BLACK MILF
Last edited by waylon on Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only advantage burnsville has over blaine is there goalie. Blaines first line is just as good as burnsvilles. While burnsvilles first line may score more goals, they are non existant in the d-zone where it counts. Blaines first line plays both ways. On top of that, blaine does have the experience at the excel, which includes 5 out of the top 6 forwards and 2 defenseman. I have seen both of these teams play and as long as Randy Johnson doesn't stand on his head I think it will be:
Blaine 6
Burnsville 3
Blaine 6
Burnsville 3
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:26 pm
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:44 pm
- Location: State of Hockey
Thats the kinda post that either makes you look like a genius or a moron. In this case, probably a moron.pipersniper12 wrote:I believe BURNSVILLE will take this one with ease. Blaine is over-rated and is the team who has the best chance of going two and out.
Blaine 5-2
Creator of the Original Applause Button,
Big_Thurst
Big_Thurst
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:49 pm
- Location: fightin in the corner
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: Right behind you!
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
Amen, brother! I posted the following before the Blaine/Anoka game:Zamboni Guy wrote:I gotta admit, I'm not a big fan of Bursville's all black socks. Mix a little gold in there fellas!
I was right... I'll be taking Blaine tonight as well.Govs93 wrote:I refuse to pick Anoka until they put stripes back on their dark socks... the solid maroon ain't workin' for me.
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
Blaine has got some good looking sock stipage going on, they perfectly accent their jerseys. Burnsville's; however, look like black sweatpants or (gasp) cooperalls!Govs93 wrote:Amen, brother! I posted the following before the Blaine/Anoka game:Zamboni Guy wrote:I gotta admit, I'm not a big fan of Bursville's all black socks. Mix a little gold in there fellas!
I was right... I'll be taking Blaine tonight as well.Govs93 wrote:I refuse to pick Anoka until they put stripes back on their dark socks... the solid maroon ain't workin' for me.

edit: typo


-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California