SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T
2 1 1 Roseville 382.715 5 31.581 31 23 8 0
2 2 2 Henry Sibley 131.493 28 41.385 25 18 7 0
2 3 3 St. Paul Blades 83.745 71 67.000 28 23 5 0
2 4 4 Hill-Murray Pioneers 46.314 4 31.115 26 10 14 2
2 5 5 Hastings 38.282 17 38.074 27 12 12 3
2 6 6 Woodbury 8.486 21 39.160 26 7 18 1
2 7 7 Park of Cottage Grove 6.019 13 36.185 26 4 22 0
2 8 8 Tartan 0.369 120 99.500 12 4 7 1
Section 2AA 2006-7
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
KRACH SAYS:
PV TEAM RATING SOSRK SOSRATING GP W L T PTS GF AVG GA AVG PCT
1 Roseville 169.489 7 34.357 14 10 2 2 22 66 4.71 22 1.57 0.786
2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 52.446 11 36.714 14 7 5 2 16 39 2.79 26 1.86 0.571
3 Hastings 43.663 31 44.143 14 8 4 2 18 47 3.36 34 2.43 0.643
4 Henry Sibley 14.952 24 42.071 14 5 8 1 11 40 2.86 41 2.93 0.393
5 Woodbury 13.108 27 43.125 16 6 10 0 12 40 2.50 40 2.50 0.375
6 St. Paul Blades 5.874 35 46.692 13 4 9 0 8 26 2.00 52 4.00 0.308
7 Park of Cottage Grove 3.985 26 42.800 15 2 12 1 5 19 1.27 54 3.60 0.167
8 Tartan 1.225 96 76.533 16 5 11 0 10 46 2.88 69 4.31 0.313
PV TEAM RATING SOSRK SOSRATING GP W L T PTS GF AVG GA AVG PCT
1 Roseville 169.489 7 34.357 14 10 2 2 22 66 4.71 22 1.57 0.786
2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 52.446 11 36.714 14 7 5 2 16 39 2.79 26 1.86 0.571
3 Hastings 43.663 31 44.143 14 8 4 2 18 47 3.36 34 2.43 0.643
4 Henry Sibley 14.952 24 42.071 14 5 8 1 11 40 2.86 41 2.93 0.393
5 Woodbury 13.108 27 43.125 16 6 10 0 12 40 2.50 40 2.50 0.375
6 St. Paul Blades 5.874 35 46.692 13 4 9 0 8 26 2.00 52 4.00 0.308
7 Park of Cottage Grove 3.985 26 42.800 15 2 12 1 5 19 1.27 54 3.60 0.167
8 Tartan 1.225 96 76.533 16 5 11 0 10 46 2.88 69 4.31 0.313
I'm a big fan of Roseville, but I have to say this is the easiest section in class AA. There really isn't one legitimate challenger, at least this year. Hastings has been playing OK but they have been very inconsistent lately (beating Cretin and Minnetonka but losing to Sibley?). Everyone else in the section is having an off year.
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
I think there is a lot more pairity statewide this year, but that aside the favorite RV shouldn't look past HM & others in the section quite yet. When Sibley gets healthy they could make some noise too, and with the goaltending Woodbury has??? Hastings with Welch and a solid group can't be overlooked. Should be interesting to see how this one plays out, and I expect some good games come section SF even with an amazing RV team leading the pack... Too many of these teams are just too deep...Bensonmum wrote:I'm a big fan of Roseville, but I have to say this is the easiest section in class AA. There really isn't one legitimate challenger, at least this year. Hastings has been playing OK but they have been very inconsistent lately (beating Cretin and Minnetonka but losing to Sibley?). Everyone else in the section is having an off year.
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
KRACH as of 1-24 AM:
RK TEAM RATING SOS RK SOS RATING GP W L T PTS GF AVG GA AVG PCT
1 Roseville 203.740 5 31.476 21 14 4 3 31 86 4.10 32 1.52 0.738
2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 56.466 20 40.286 21 12 7 2 26 59 2.81 39 1.86 0.619
3 Hastings 55.024 34 46.591 22 13 5 4 30 67 3.05 44 2.00 0.682
4 Henry Sibley 13.029 30 44.909 22 8 13 1 17 59 2.68 66 3.00 0.386
5 Woodbury 12.749 15 37.238 22 7 14 1 15 49 2.23 56 2.55 0.341
6 St. Paul Blades 5.494 45 50.750 20 7 13 0 14 40 2.00 79 3.95 0.350
7 Park of Cottage Grove 5.214 14 36.571 21 3 17 1 7 26 1.24 69 3.29 0.167
8 Tartan 0.588 81 68.952 22 5 17 0 10 55 2.50 109 4.95 0.227
RK TEAM RATING SOS RK SOS RATING GP W L T PTS GF AVG GA AVG PCT
1 Roseville 203.740 5 31.476 21 14 4 3 31 86 4.10 32 1.52 0.738
2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 56.466 20 40.286 21 12 7 2 26 59 2.81 39 1.86 0.619
3 Hastings 55.024 34 46.591 22 13 5 4 30 67 3.05 44 2.00 0.682
4 Henry Sibley 13.029 30 44.909 22 8 13 1 17 59 2.68 66 3.00 0.386
5 Woodbury 12.749 15 37.238 22 7 14 1 15 49 2.23 56 2.55 0.341
6 St. Paul Blades 5.494 45 50.750 20 7 13 0 14 40 2.00 79 3.95 0.350
7 Park of Cottage Grove 5.214 14 36.571 21 3 17 1 7 26 1.24 69 3.29 0.167
8 Tartan 0.588 81 68.952 22 5 17 0 10 55 2.50 109 4.95 0.227
The bracket has been completed for 2AA on the MSHSL website. It's the first one filled in I think. It looks pretty much as expected. HM gets #2 seed over Hastings....best game 1st round Woodbury at Sibley. Hastings vs HM possibility in round 2 would be a tough defensive game-- HM 1.7 GA, Hastings 2.1 GA.
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/showbrackets.asp?tournid=187
KRACH SEED TEAM RATING
1 1 Roseville 257.778
2 2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 69.910
3 3 Hastings 49.941
4 4 Henry Sibley 14.270
5 5 Woodbury 12.964
6 6 St. Paul Blades 5.191
7 7 Park of Cottage Grove 4.608
8 8 Tartan 0.461
KRACH SEED TEAM RATING
1 1 Roseville 257.778
2 2 Hill-Murray Pioneers 69.910
3 3 Hastings 49.941
4 4 Henry Sibley 14.270
5 5 Woodbury 12.964
6 6 St. Paul Blades 5.191
7 7 Park of Cottage Grove 4.608
8 8 Tartan 0.461
At the Vet last night (2AA Semis)
Hastings 1 HM 0
The Hastings goalie (Lindsey Kleis) is a small, wiry, athletic type and was all over the ice last night. Excellent game for her--she was the difference and a lot of fun to watch.
Roseville 3 Sibley 0
Shots were around 30-6. Not as competitive as the score would indicate. Roseville is just so fast. They were a littlle sloppy around the Sibley net, some missed opportunities.
They've outscored Hastings 10-1 in their two games this year, the only two games all season that Kleis has given up 4 or more goals.
Hastings 1 HM 0
The Hastings goalie (Lindsey Kleis) is a small, wiry, athletic type and was all over the ice last night. Excellent game for her--she was the difference and a lot of fun to watch.
Roseville 3 Sibley 0
Shots were around 30-6. Not as competitive as the score would indicate. Roseville is just so fast. They were a littlle sloppy around the Sibley net, some missed opportunities.
They've outscored Hastings 10-1 in their two games this year, the only two games all season that Kleis has given up 4 or more goals.
-
ghshockeyfan
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
Since there don't seem to be any Roseville boosters on the forum, I'll give a rundown--I've seen them 7 or 8 times as a more or less neutral observer at the beginning of the season (I'm a big fan now).
They have the best team speed I've seen this year (including EP,BSM and AHA, although I didn't see Edina). They have one true superstar and possibly the best freshman class in the state. Some of their 'supporting' cast upperclassmen would be stars on other teams (Babineau, Flanagan, Hoium).
What might be overlooked is their excellent defense--they always out-shoot their opponents (Edina managed only 11 shots) and give up very few quality shots (tonight in the 2AA Final they outshot Hastings around 30-15 and I don't remember one true quality chance by Hastings). Part of that is they win the race to just about every loose puck and then control the puck so well, defense and forwards. They are as tenacious as any team at the forecheck (along with Stillwater and EP) as well as backcheck. They are tough--Hastings pummeled them tonight and they bounced back up every time and never missed a beat.
They split their goaltending duties between Brausen and Kapsner, both are solid (GAA of 1.0 and 1.6), although I've never really seen them 'tested'. They're very well coached and they skate 3 lines almost exclusively. The one possible weakness they've shown lately is not being able to score on all of their good oppurtunities. They should have had a couple more against Sibley on Thursday and also tonight, but who's complaining?
They have the best team speed I've seen this year (including EP,BSM and AHA, although I didn't see Edina). They have one true superstar and possibly the best freshman class in the state. Some of their 'supporting' cast upperclassmen would be stars on other teams (Babineau, Flanagan, Hoium).
What might be overlooked is their excellent defense--they always out-shoot their opponents (Edina managed only 11 shots) and give up very few quality shots (tonight in the 2AA Final they outshot Hastings around 30-15 and I don't remember one true quality chance by Hastings). Part of that is they win the race to just about every loose puck and then control the puck so well, defense and forwards. They are as tenacious as any team at the forecheck (along with Stillwater and EP) as well as backcheck. They are tough--Hastings pummeled them tonight and they bounced back up every time and never missed a beat.
They split their goaltending duties between Brausen and Kapsner, both are solid (GAA of 1.0 and 1.6), although I've never really seen them 'tested'. They're very well coached and they skate 3 lines almost exclusively. The one possible weakness they've shown lately is not being able to score on all of their good oppurtunities. They should have had a couple more against Sibley on Thursday and also tonight, but who's complaining?