Siver Region Bantam and PeeWee "A" Tournaments

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:07 pm

the D4 teams for PWA are #1 Mankato, #2 New Prague, #3/4 Faribault and #3/4 New Ulm. I do not know theresults of D5, and it would be helpful if I could find out.

Blade Side Down · Post by **Blade Side Down** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:26 pm

D-5 Bantam A is: #1 Buffalo #2 Hutchinson Pee Wee A is: #1 Sartell #2 Buffalo They received District bye for the first and second place reagular finishes. D-5 Web page say's Playoffs for the other two are Saturday the 25th.

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:30 pm

thanks for the "updates"....Should be a fun tourney...predictions would be GREAT!

hockey school · Post by **hockey school** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:34 pm

Faribault 8 New Ulm 0<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat">

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:08 pm

So Mankato Purple and Faribault are on the same side of the bracket as each other at the PWA level...Can Mankato Purple avenge two 2-1 losses in the regular season against Faribault, assuming they both win their first round games? Should be a somewhat D4 dominated tourney with Kato, NP, and Fari. in it...If Buffalo has beaten Sartell, and Kato has beaten Buffalo, two D4 teams should meet in the Championship, but that would be on paper. Anything can happen, especially at this age level.Any info on Sartell or Buffalo PWA anyone?

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:13 pm

ahh to bad kato and far are on the same side of the bracket. i woulda loved to have seen another faribault kato rematch to go to state!

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:21 pm

Yes it would've been a good rematch...but it is also always good to have some new teams face each other as well. All, in all it will be two good tourneys. Bantam A the favorites have to be Buffalo or New Prague I believe?

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:45 pm

Does anyone know the Officall pairings? All i need is the D5 teams, as I have all of the D4 teams...

ALdude9 · Post by **ALdude9** » Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:33 pm

Bantams #1 Buffalo vs. #4 Albert Lea #2 Owatonna .vs #3 Crow River #3 Mankato vs. #2 Hutchinson #1 New Prague vs. #4 Sartell

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:05 pm

Offical PeeWee "A" Bracket <a href="http://www.minnesotahockey.org/assorted ... ee%20A.pdf" target="top">Offical PeeWee "A" Bracket</a> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eykid14</A> at: 2/27/06 1:05 pm

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:31 pm

Should be pretty competitive...I'm thinking for PWA, 3 of 4 winners will be from D4, with Sartell taking New Ulm out. They should all be good games, and if someone doesn't come to play, they'll be crushed.

hockeyequalslife · Post by **hockeyequalslife** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:45 pm

Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... alslife</A> at: 2/28/06 8:08 pm

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:54 pm

are those PWA or BA?

hockeyequalslife · Post by **hockeyequalslife** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:12 pm

Buffalo 5 Albert lea 1 Owat 1 Crow 3 Mank 2 Hutch 3 NP 5 sart 2 SEMI'S Buffalo 6 Crow 2 Hutch 1 NP5 FINALS NP 2 Buff 3 O.T

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:09 pm

thats pretty bold you having crow river beat albert lea?? <hr />I am the souperstar.

hockey school · Post by **hockey school** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:31 am

How do you guys think fari will do in Regions this year

NateFranch · Post by **NateFranch** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:41 am

I'd say Faribault has as good a chance as any team to win the Silver Region and go to state. They lost to NP in Districts, but they blew up New Ulm 8-0 after that and I think they will be ready to go. They play the best team hockey in D4 PWA. Hard to tell how Buffalo will do against Faribault in the first round, but since Buffalo already lost to Mankato (6-5) and Faribault beat Mankato twice this year, I like Faribaults chances there.

D5Dreamer · Post by **D5Dreamer** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 3:12 pm

Sartell is the team to beat. Buffalo may have lost to Mankato but if you watched the game it was pretty clear which was the better team.....shots were 39-23 in Buffalo's favor. Buffalo has two goalies and one is much more experienced than the other....both played against Mankato and it made a huge difference.

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:48 pm

I doubt it...The shots on goal were much closer than that, as every time a shot was taken for Buffalo it was added on the board. We will justh ave to see how this thing plays out. I'm taking Faribault over Buffalo 5-2. BTW, Mankato was down 3 players for their game against Buffalo, oneo f them their Captin Drew Weber, and they still beat Buffalo 6-5.

D5Dreamer · Post by **D5Dreamer** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:52 pm

Wow....you're suggesting the shots were inacurate? I take it you were there! I was. Buffalo was missing two of it's better players also. Buffalo would win 8 out of 10 times they played.

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:54 pm

Whatever you say Dreamer. Oh, and BTW, I was there!<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"> I watched the game. Actually I played in it. BTW, I hear you have one guy that's done for the year? BTW: How is Mound Westonka? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eykid14</A> at: 3/1/06 4:57 pm

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:59 pm

well if buffalo lost to mankato without drew playing thats quite an accomplishment for kato. im not saying drew is the whole team but he is the anchor. if drew was there look for the score not to be as close. <hr />I am the souperstar.

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:01 pm

Yes, on most teams the captin is the anchor of the team. I think the biggest thing for Mankato Purple in this region is they have to move the puck and be as physical as they were in districts. They have to play SMART HOCKEY... BTW, Why isn't Dreamer replying?<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eykid14</A> at: 3/1/06 5:03 pm

D5Dreamer · Post by **D5Dreamer** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:03 pm

Ah....that explains it all. Not only a Mankato homer but a kid! Yes, one of the kids is out for a few more weeks...of course, we're hoping he'll be back in time for the state tournament! I'll cut the harshness, but honestly......everyone from Buffalo (and we're homers like everyone else) thought that we were much better than Mankato....knowing our goalie situation (check our web-site for the stats on goalies)......and I understand that you feel it went the other way...that's hockey. Good luck against Crow River. They are ok.....but honestly...I was surprised they made it out of districts!

D5Dreamer · Post by **D5Dreamer** » Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:06 pm

Ditto on Mound Westonka.....I thought MAML & Hutchinson were better than Crow River & Mound.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Siver Region Bantam and PeeWee "A" Tournaments

Siver Region Bantam and PeeWee "A" Tournaments

Re: Siver Region Bantam and PeeWee "A" Tournaments

Thanks

Faribault vs. New Ulm

Mankato and Faribault on same side of bracket...revenge?

Re: Mankato and Faribault on same side of bracket...revenge?

Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Siver Region Bantam and PeeWee "A" Tournaments

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Sivler Region Tournaments

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Re: Soup 3, agreed!

Silver region

Faribault PWA

Silver Regional

Re: Silver Regional

Silver Regional

Re: Silver Regional

Re: Silver Regional

Re: Silver Regional

Silver Regional

Silver Regionals