different defenses
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
different defenses
I was at a game in rochester the other night and noticed that there is a very different kind of defense played at the game i was at as compared to the BSM vs HM, BSM vs Edina, and the games at the schwan cup. I am trying to understand how a team can seem like they should not be able to keep up with a much better team on the defensive end. In summary the team on offense comes out of their zone by using quick passes and has no difficulty. Once they hit the blue line the team on defense has at least four of their five players in the area between the blue lines and the team on offense who is the better team can not get through to the offensive blue line and inside the zone without dumping and seam to never get control of the puck after it is dumped.
The team on offense often tries to skate through the area between the blue lines but often just loses the puck and end up on defense themselves.
So the question is what kind of defense is this and is it used by the better teams also or just a certain type of squad. Also what kind of offense would break through this defense.
The team on offense often tries to skate through the area between the blue lines but often just loses the puck and end up on defense themselves.
So the question is what kind of defense is this and is it used by the better teams also or just a certain type of squad. Also what kind of offense would break through this defense.
Re: different defenses
Sounds like you described a "Trap." (a 1-2-2 setting)grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:I was at a game in rochester the other night and noticed that there is a very different kind of defense played at the game i was at as compared to the BSM vs HM, BSM vs Edina, and the games at the schwan cup. I am trying to understand how a team can seem like they should not be able to keep up with a much better team on the defensive end. In summary the team on offense comes out of their zone by using quick passes and has no difficulty. Once they hit the blue line the team on defense has at least four of their five players in the area between the blue lines and the team on offense who is the better team can not get through to the offensive blue line and inside the zone without dumping and seam to never get control of the puck after it is dumped.
The team on offense often tries to skate through the area between the blue lines but often just loses the puck and end up on defense themselves.
So the question is what kind of defense is this and is it used by the better teams also or just a certain type of squad. Also what kind of offense would break through this defense.
The Puck
LGW
LGW
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:35 pm
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
beautiful thing on defense
I am suprised that so many people have stated that they think it is a beatiful thing. What kind of offense works against that kind of defense. Is there a particular tactic an offense will use.
Re: beautiful thing on defense
Did you ever watch the Minnesota Wild team play when Lamiere was coach?grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:I am suprised that so many people have stated that they think it is a beatiful thing. What kind of offense works against that kind of defense. Is there a particular tactic an offense will use.
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: beautiful thing on defense
Yes i did and I did not enjoy it then either. How does a team use their superior skill to beat the trap.BodyShots wrote:Did you ever watch the Minnesota Wild team play when Lamiere was coach?grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:I am suprised that so many people have stated that they think it is a beatiful thing. What kind of offense works against that kind of defense. Is there a particular tactic an offense will use.
Re: beautiful thing on defense
Sound breakout/regrouping strategies then a dump and chase once across the red line; tire the defense out. Then forecheck, forecheck, forecheck.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Yes i did and I did not enjoy it then either. How does a team use their superior skill to beat the trap.BodyShots wrote:Did you ever watch the Minnesota Wild team play when Lamiere was coach?grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:I am suprised that so many people have stated that they think it is a beatiful thing. What kind of offense works against that kind of defense. Is there a particular tactic an offense will use.
The Puck
LGW
LGW
If you have a defenseman that can rush the puck and sees the ice well enough to make the right pass once the trap has been busted that works pretty well. Also the players without the puck need to move to the open spaces, too often they caught standing and watching making the trap even more effective.
If you don't do that, well, then you'll turn the puck over at one of the bluelines more times than not.
If you don't do that, well, then you'll turn the puck over at one of the bluelines more times than not.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:08 pm
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: beautiful thing on defense
Could someone help me by explaining sound breakout/regrouping.PuckU126 wrote:Sound breakout/regrouping strategies then a dump and chase once across the red line; tire the defense out. Then forecheck, forecheck, forecheck.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Yes i did and I did not enjoy it then either. How does a team use their superior skill to beat the trap.BodyShots wrote: Did you ever watch the Minnesota Wild team play when Lamiere was coach?