More hockey reading leading into the holidays...
The top 20 regardless of class
http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/page/show_ar ... 5188/40228
and the Week Ahead
http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/page/show_ar ... 5188/40236
just posted new Top 20 and Week Ahead articles
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Re: just posted new Top 20 and Week Ahead articles
Elk River lost close games to Eden Prairie (3-0) and Edina (6-3) before beating Grand Rapids (3-2) on Saturday.
Since when is losing by 3 considered close games?
Since when is losing by 3 considered close games?
-
east hockey
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Re: just posted new Top 20 and Week Ahead articles
It was 4-3 until under three minutes were left in the game. Sometimes you have to look beyond the score and study what actually happened.BodyShots wrote:Elk River lost close games to Eden Prairie (3-0) and Edina (6-3) before beating Grand Rapids (3-2) on Saturday.
Since when is losing by 3 considered close games?
Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
Re: just posted new Top 20 and Week Ahead articles
Your right Lee. There are close games score wise, and there are close games play wise. For example, Tonka beat Blaine last night 4-3. A close score, but if you saw the game, Tonka dominated and the shots reflected it (33-12). So, were both of these ER 3 goal loss games close in play? I don't know, because I wasn't there. It just struck me as an add comment given that they lost two games by 3 goals and they were termed "close".east hockey wrote:It was 4-3 until under three minutes were left in the game. Sometimes you have to look beyond the score and study what actually happened.BodyShots wrote:Elk River lost close games to Eden Prairie (3-0) and Edina (6-3) before beating Grand Rapids (3-2) on Saturday.
Since when is losing by 3 considered close games?
Lee