Holy Angels @ Shattuck 2-2-08

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:26 pm

After losing their first to the Stars last year I'm sure Shattuck would like to make sure that doesn't happen again.

Rossbury21 · Post by **Rossbury21** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:27 pm

Gotta go with Shattuck, there is a reason Sydney Crosby played there, I think last year was a fluke.

The_Phantom_Enigma · Post by **The_Phantom_Enigma** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:03 pm

Shattuck! No-Doot-Aboot-It

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:13 pm

Holy Angels just gave up 6 to and lost by 3 to a Minnetonka team. I think SSM might be a little better than Minnetonka.

SSM by 5

parrish4president · Post by **parrish4president** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:44 am

Goldy Gopher wrote:Holy Angels just gave up 6 to and lost by 3 to a Minnetonka team. I think SSM might be a little better than Minnetonka.

SSM by 5

which shattuck team are they playing, just to clarfiy

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:14 am

parrish4president wrote:which shattuck team are they playing, just to clarfiy

The Prep team (the team that plays in the Elite League)

ya-man · Post by **ya-man** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:49 pm

No question, Shattuck will win at whatever score they want it to be. But I will not agree that last year was a fluke. I was at the game and it was extremely entertaining. AHA had a much different and much better team last year.

Lucia4President · Post by **Lucia4President** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:52 pm

Shattuck 7
Holy Angels 1

tjkhavgam · Post by **tjkhavgam** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:20 pm

Bishop Whipple 8
Mattson 2

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:17 pm

Shattuck by 3

gongshowhockey · Post by **gongshowhockey** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:40 pm

for once I feel bad for the academy, their gonna get demolished

TooManyEagles · Post by **TooManyEagles** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:57 pm

Shattuck 9
AHA 2

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:10 pm

Now I have to post something about this game. I will never say that my team will lose, but this one is gonna be tough. AHA is playing well, whether or not you want to agree, the game against Minnetonka they were in it until the last four minutes. SSM is talented and play a completely different style than most high school teams. Some obvious points about this game are: AHA beat SSM last year and the revenge factor must be high. It is parents weekend at SSM and that is a big reason for SSM to play good and they are at home. I am hoping the game is clean and both teams play with good sportsmanship, as far as a score. I cannot even guess...I will be there that is for sure.

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:42 pm

Shattuck...a clear-cut victory.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:00 pm

Score and recap anyone?

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:04 pm

STARS 2
SSM 1 After 1

SSM 4
AHA 2 After 2

SSM 7
AHA 2 Final.

Not sure about the shots, but I am guessing SSM had 35 - 40 and AHA may have had 15. Lots of penalties by AHA, weak calls. SSM is good. BSM beating them is like AHA last year.

Gotothenetman · Post by **Gotothenetman** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:06 pm

Zamman wrote:STARS 2 Not sure about the shots, but I am guessing SSM had 35 - 40 and AHA may have had 15. Lots of penalties by AHA, weak calls. SSM is good. BSM beating them is like AHA last year.

I was there I would guess the shots were closer to 50 - 9 SSM. I did not see a shot on goal in the 3rd by AHA.

O-townClown · Post by **O-townClown** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:11 pm

Shattuck had the revenge factor two ways. AHA last year and another Minnesota HS team the day before.

neverenough · Post by **neverenough** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:14 pm

I was at the game and the shots where 69 to 12 Shattuck. I heard another count of 75 to 12. An I think those where close to on the money.

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:17 pm

I would guess the BSM games was not a factor. AHA beating SSM last year is a factor. SSm plays like bees looking for pollen, they swarm on the puck and play it real well. Many times we saw when the face-off was in the offensive zone, the player near the boards would swing around to the other side and get the pass then shoot right away.
When AHA was on the power-play it looked like they tried real hard to get the shot from the side, when they could have shot from the point many times. Easy for me to say, I was not playing.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:08 am

The team that played BSM wasn't the same team that played AHA, was it?

AHA was up after 1, what happened after that?

kickinwing · Post by **kickinwing** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:08 am

aha 2-6 against meaningful opponents .bring on the hillbillys.

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:20 am

HShockeywatcher wrote:The team that played BSM wasn't the same team that played AHA, was it?

Yes it was

starmom · Post by **starmom** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:53 am

Holy Angels is having trouble keeping it going in the third period. It's been a problem all season

tshockey2 · Post by **tshockey2** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:08 am

This game was not even close. The shots were 51-9, the game was played in the AHA end the whole game. Holy had 8 shots in the first, one in the second and zero in the third. To hold a team to one shot in the last 2 periods is impressive. Shattuck gave up 11 to BSM and 9 to Holy. Thats 20 shots all weekend, they should of won both games. But in saying that give credit to BSM, they did what they had to do to win on Friday night. Holy's goalie played very well. To be honest it was a repeat of the BSM game.

The powerplay for Shattuck was fun to watch. The puck did not stay on a SSM stick for 2 seconds. Shattuck had 5 powerplays and AHA had 3, and AHA had a 1:53 5-3, so this had nothing to do with refs. Shattuck was real good lastnight.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Holy Angels @ Shattuck 2-2-08

Who wins?

Holy Angels @ Shattuck 2-2-08

wow

Shattuck vs. AHA

Wow!!!