Schilling's Bloody Sock

The Only Forum for Non-Hockey Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply

Who do you believe?

Thorne-"It was paint"
4
29%
Mirabelli-"It was blood"
10
71%
 
Total votes: 14

State Champ 97
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
Location: Bemidji

Schilling's Bloody Sock

Post by State Champ 97 »

Gary Thorne said, on air, that Doug Mirabelli (Red Sox back up catcher) told him it was paint on the sock and not blood. It was set up as a publicity stunt. When asked Mirabelli was furious. Who do you believe? Thoughts?
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

I still think it was red pine tar that Schilling would touch and use to alter his pitches.

Image
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
brew17ery
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:55 pm

Post by brew17ery »

I think it was blood..i dont believe myself that schilling would do that..especially with all the attention he gets already for being a great pitcher
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

Post by ChrisK »

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:I still think it was red pine tar that Schilling would touch and use to alter his pitches.

Image
Wouldn't blood work just as well? Plus if he got enough on the ball it might spray and temporarily blind the batter.
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

ChrisK wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:I still think it was red pine tar that Schilling would touch and use to alter his pitches.

Image
Wouldn't blood work just as well? Plus if he got enough on the ball it might spray and temporarily blind the batter.
Chris, you should know that Curt's pitch is a splitter. The blood would spray off and thus give away the rotation and the pitch. And he would have to reapply nearly every pitch because most balls would end up in the dirt. Come on now...

Image
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
TomTheBomb
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:00 pm

Post by TomTheBomb »

I heard a guy on the radio say there was no way Schilling would have the surgery he had and not bandage it up properly, especially while playing in a major sporting event. He said if it was bandaged properly, you could smash it with a bat and the blood still wouldn't seep through.

Also, I didn't notice this personally, but it was discussed that the blood spot never grew bigger during his time on the mound, but only between innings behind the scenes.

I wouldn't doubt it was his blood, but I am thinking it was placed there for publicity. Maybe his team didn't know, and it was a plasebo to get them rallied, or that was the idea.
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

Post by ChrisK »

EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
ChrisK wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:I still think it was red pine tar that Schilling would touch and use to alter his pitches.

Image
Wouldn't blood work just as well? Plus if he got enough on the ball it might spray and temporarily blind the batter.
Chris, you should know that Curt's pitch is a splitter. The blood would spray off and thus give away the rotation and the pitch. And he would have to reapply nearly every pitch because most balls would end up in the dirt. Come on now...

Image
He wouldn't need to use it on the splitter, that doesn't need any help. Maybe he saved it for the curve, even if the spray telegraphed the rotation the batter would have to close his eyes keep the blood out.

If it wasn't blood, do the Red Sox have to give back their rings?
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Mercurochrome?
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

Weak, that's all.

Image
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
Post Reply