White Bear Vs. Hill Murray 12/23

TheNightman · Post by **TheNightman** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:32 pm

MNHShockey12 wrote:
mnpuckster wrote:Either way, there were rumors he was heading to play juniors. And I think we all know who I am talking about. Sure he can skate, but wow the mental mistakes were rediculous. He just didnt play up to par. WBL is always solid defensively and I just dont see it this season.
I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?

Putney I would assume?

scoreboard33 · Post by **scoreboard33** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:14 pm

Sparlimb wrote:
SEC Scotty wrote:Hills #7 is one of the fastest in the state. Also spends most of his time suckholing behind the other teams D, doesn't help out much in his own end, and is a graduate of the Robbie Earls school of diving. Fantastic skater though.
Zepeda's back-checking was one of the major reasons Hill beat Roseau and Edina last year. He did the work when it was necessary and he will again. I actually noticed it last night too, but he certainly is ready to take off when the puck turns over which is his job. We'll take it...

Against Edina, this year, his effort was top of the line, he once outskated his D into the corner and then won the battle with Anders Lee and started a 2 on 1 break. He has definitely changed as a player.

blanco oso · Post by **blanco oso** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:54 pm

TheNightman wrote:
MNHShockey12 wrote:
mnpuckster wrote:Either way, there were rumors he was heading to play juniors. And I think we all know who I am talking about. Sure he can skate, but wow the mental mistakes were rediculous. He just didnt play up to par. WBL is always solid defensively and I just dont see it this season.
I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?
Putney I would assume?

i agree, and hes not all that great

mnhcky65 · Post by **mnhcky65** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:00 pm

blanco oso wrote:
TheNightman wrote:
MNHShockey12 wrote: I don't think everyone knows who you are talking about. Can you let people know who you are talking about?
Putney I would assume?
i agree, and hes not all that great

asfar as i know, Putney, Lowell, and Swanson i beleive all played in some junior camps but none made a junior team.

hockeyislife34 · Post by **hockeyislife34** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:36 pm

mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.

Is Zepeda number 10?

scoreboard33 · Post by **scoreboard33** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:19 pm

hockeyislife34 wrote:
mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.
Is Zepeda number 10?

No, he is 7. 10 is Prescott, who I despise.

blanco oso · Post by **blanco oso** » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:07 pm

scoreboard33 wrote:
hockeyislife34 wrote:
mnpuckster wrote:The first period was very suprising as it was played fairly evenly, maybe because white bear came out with so much emotion. second and third periods white bear lost their legs and were absolutely dominated in all phases of the game. I am more of a white bear fan than a hill fan, and I it was pretty dissapointing seeing such a one-sided game. As far as the players, Kohls was awesome tonight, and that goal was very nice. Zepeda is quick out there, and can creat a lot of offense fast. For White bear, not to mention any names, I was extremely disspointed with the defensemen who was supposed to be going to the USHL this season. Boy did he play poorly tonight. Terrible turnovers turned into goals for hill. With your best defensemen playing like that, its over for a team like WBL. Offensively I thought Birkenbine was the best on the ice for WB tonight, with 18 and Wahlin as well. Collette made some nice saves, but as some of you had already mentioned, to beat hill in late feb-early march, he is going to have to play ALOT better.
Is Zepeda number 10?
No, he is 7. 10 is Prescott, who I despise.

youll find #7 posted up at the blue line with his stick high in the air 95% of the time just trying to get a break away goal...what a suck hole

stpaul · Post by **stpaul** » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:34 pm

B.S.
Zepeda is a great passer and playmaker.

Here are his numbers:
9th grade - 7 goals & 10 assists
10th grade - 15 & 35
11th grade - 14 & 32
12th grade - 4 & 11 in 8 games.

Thats 40 goals and 88 assists in 3+ yrs. He uses his speed to set up other guys. He's not chasing after lone breaks.

stpaul · Post by **stpaul** » Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:21 pm

...and he was a big part of this

SEC Scotty · Post by **SEC Scotty** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:37 pm

stpaul wrote:...and he was a big part of this

Heaven on earth. Hill Murray Hockey.(Clouds Part) Give me the players they get year in and year out and I could hang a banner.

HShockeyz · Post by **HShockeyz** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:28 pm

see those dates

1991 then 2008

not to good considering the talent is pouring out the doors...

Sparlimb · Post by **Sparlimb** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:14 pm

HShockeyz wrote:see those dates

1991 then 2008

not to good considering the talent is pouring out the doors...

True, but all that talent knows the correct "too" to use...

HShockeyz · Post by **HShockeyz** » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:41 pm

nice catch, but surely you don't really believe that. I've known quite a few and they wouldn't know to from too from three.

PS

Not sure if this is even write, 1991-2008 nothing? They had too win at least one in their???

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:55 am

How about the phoney banner they have hanging with 1972 AA state champions? In 72 there was no AA and Hill played in the all Private school tourny!

youngblood08 · Post by **youngblood08** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:09 am

I still think that's TWO more then WBL has hanging in thier building...............Ohhh wait doesn't WBL consider Aldrich thier home rink also??????? Must sting having TO look at those every home game.

stpaul · Post by **stpaul** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:03 am

It's great to have WBL folks whining about Hill-Murray again. Earlier this decade it looked as of WBL was going to take over. They had the better teams for a few years. WBL beat HM 8-0 in the last game of the 2000-2001 season. Now of course HM has won 9 in a row against our friends and hung a new banner at Aldrich. Sorry those banners aren't accurate enough for you. Here's the accurate record:

1970 State Independent Champions
1972 State Independent Champions
1983 State Champions
1991 State Champions
2008 State AA Champions

Hopefully we'll see you March 3rd at the Coliseum.

PS - between 1991-2008 HM did just fine. In those 16 yrs. they won 11 conference titles and 8 section titles. They played in the state finals twice - in 1993 vs. Jefferson and 2002 vs. Holy Angels. During those same years WBL went 0-7 in the state quarterfinals to make it 0-17 all time.

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:25 pm

stpaul wrote:It's great to have WBL folks whining about Hill-Murray again. Earlier this decade it looked as of WBL was going to take over. They had the better teams for a few years. WBL beat HM 8-0 in the last game of the 2000-2001 season. Now of course HM has won 9 in a row against our friends and hung a new banner at Aldrich. Sorry those banners aren't accurate enough for you. Here's the accurate record:

1970 State Independent Champions
1972 State Independent Champions
1983 State Champions
1991 State Champions
2008 State AA Champions

Hopefully we'll see you March 3rd at the Coliseum. Who said anyting about White Bear?
PS - between 1991-2008 HM did just fine. In those 16 yrs. they won 11 conference titles and 8 section titles. They played in the state finals twice - in 1993 vs. Jefferson and 2002 vs. Holy Angels. During those same years WBL went 0-7 in the state quarterfinals to make it 0-17 all time.

PuckPatrol · Post by **PuckPatrol** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:27 pm

I dont particularly get into silly banter, but when one talks about all the conference titles Hill has won... lets be real.... look who is in that conference... Im not taking away from what they have... but dont try to grind in the conference title thing... its really not relavent.

Secondly... It is much like comparing apples to oranges.. public vs. private. I personally think WBL is on its way down, and Hill will always be hill....

sachishi4 · Post by **sachishi4** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:19 pm

STA, Tartan, SSP, and Mahtomedi are no pushovers in the conference. Everyone gets to play Sibley and Simley too

thorhockey · Post by **thorhockey** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Now of course HM has won 9 in a row against our friends

Oh yeah, lest we forget , HM 1 in a row over rival Tartan (split last year).
After Saturday "0" in a row.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:05 pm

Why is that Tartan looks at Hill as a rival & Hill looks at Tartan as just another game on the schedule?

slapstkhound · Post by **slapstkhound** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:53 pm

Hill Murray won and White Bear lost. Everyone hates Hill and most of us hate White Bear. Get over it and move on people.

CityHockey11 · Post by **CityHockey11** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:45 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:Why is that Tartan looks at Hill as a rival & Hill looks at Tartan as just another game on the schedule?

Not anymore...i suppose things just seem to even themselves out somehow...

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

White Bear Vs. Hill Murray 12/23

Who's gonna win it?

Tyler Zepeda

HM

Re: HM

LOL HAHA

HM - WBL

Re: HM - WBL

White Bear Vs. Hill Murray 12/23