Don't forget access to ice. When you take 10% of a typical Metro school's enrollment, and give them 10,000% more ice time, it starts to look a little more level.Potatohead9 wrote: Give DE and Moorhead some credit.......Some of these schools are more than 2x the size. Other Schools like Roseau and Grand Rapids are even smaller. I think they said this about Roseau when they opted up to play the big schools and yet they have not only produced section final teams but State Champion Teams. I do not look solely on what their youth teams are ranked. Quality Coaching and the program itself must come into consideration.
Each new hockey season sees a fresh crop of Metro area PeeWee and Bantam players and parents making the pilgrimage Up North to play in a Roseau Tournament. And each year, these players and parents leave Roseau with no small amount of awe and/or jealousy about the set-up they have there. A city with 2,800 residents has two stoplights and three sheets of ice, one rink which is reserved for free never-ending games of pick-up hockey? The typical metro suburb might have 50,000 residents and only two sheets of ice (sometimes shared by multiple youth hockey associations). You can play pick-up hockey games inside these suburban rinks, but only if your parents are willing to whip out their wallets to pay the $180/hr rental fee.
There's always outdoor ice and backyard rinks...but there again, you guys Up North have the distinct weather advantage (especially this year). Throw in the tradition, the culture, the community support, and even more hyperfocus on hockey as the only high school sport that matters (do they even play basketball in Roseau?), and I think that Northern teams will continue to do just fine, despite the differences in enrollment.