
Obviously a petition to move down, but it isn’t like they were completely overwhelmed in AA.
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Some of these Class A sections are becoming pretty unwieldy in size. We have basically reached the point that Karl discussed of AA just being 64 teams including opt-ups.StanleyCup55 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 1:57 pm Wow. A lot of opting down to A. Soon the AA tourney will just be Edina vs all private schools. How exciting!
yeah. that's odd. PageStat only has 8 teams above them at the A level this last season. 3 bantam teams in the youth level.
Did I ever tell you the one about the MAML team a couple years back..? Three schools combined having 1,700 students and they had 4 or 5 foreign exchange players including one that now plays for his national team to top it off.... Talk about a good hoodwinking......mrchips wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 2:23 pmyeah. that's odd. PageStat only has 8 teams above them at the A level this last season. 3 bantam teams in the youth level.
http://www.minnhock.com/ps2019.htm
I know this fall there had been a lot of discussion at Kasson-Mantorville about dropping schools from their co-op. Most of the Dodge County players are from Kasson and Byron, the rest of the schools don't have players every year. Now, I believe Kasson and Byron combined would be pretty close to the AA cutoff (both schools will be AA in Track) so penalizing Dodge County for letting a kid from Blooming Prairie with no other place to play seemed harsh. The timing is a bit ironic as the Dodge County Bantam A team made the state tournament while the rest of 1AA, aside from Hastings, seems on the downswing the next couple of years.
And yet the eternal mystery of keeping CDH in 6AA with a bunch of west suburban schools remains.cjmhockey19 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 5:09 pm The MSHSL has made it very clear they dont care about competitive balance they care about GEOGRAPHICAL balance.
I take that back, MSHSL has them both in 4A, is this correct?inthetwine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:22 am Just looked at the MSHSL website, Tartan and North St. Paul are not in any section.
Yesinthetwine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:33 amI take that back, MSHSL has them both in 4A, is this correct?inthetwine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:22 am Just looked at the MSHSL website, Tartan and North St. Paul are not in any section.
Is that new? I thought Agnes was previously with Minnehaha Academy, and they had to petition down to single A based on cooperative enrollment.
Then how in the hell do they split up Lakeville North and South?cjmhockey19 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 5:09 pm The MSHSL has made it very clear they dont care about competitive balance they care about GEOGRAPHICAL balance.
It certainly seems to be that way. 1AA is now the only AA section with more than eight teams. It would have been interesting to see how the MSHSL would’ve handled the appeals if a few teams (Duluth Marshall or Bemidji, as hypothetical examples) had decided to play at the A level. The league might actually have to deny appeals or face the prospect of having a seven team AA section.
Exactly because of geography, actually. There are 7 teams south of Lakeville South. Add in Lakeville North and South to the girls section 1AA and you have a 9 team section and two sections of 7. Keep South in 1AA and move North to 3AA, then you have each of those sections with 8 teams and have just one 7 team section in the state. Geography and enrollment (unless opting down/up) are the only determiners.GopherHockey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 1:46 pmThen how in the hell do they split up Lakeville North and South?cjmhockey19 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 5:09 pm The MSHSL has made it very clear they dont care about competitive balance they care about GEOGRAPHICAL balance.
I like this move. It will make 2A even more competitive. Overall, this is my favorite section to watch in the metro area.
MSHSL got to sell mediocrity. What public fools do best.StanleyCup55 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 2:09 pm It looks to me like they’re setting up to go with 3 classes after the next meeting in two years which I’ve heard (on here) is going to be a big change.
I don’t have a problem with that rationale in theory, as studies have shown that kids from lower income households are less likely to participate in sports, particularly an expensive one like hockey.