I don't understand how people are giving 2.5 periods to GR.minnscout wrote:GR dominated for 2 1/2 periods before letting off the gas in the final 6 minutes. 1st 8 minutes off the game Edina could not get the puck out of their own end. Not enough scoring depth on Edina and the D and Goalie are very questionable beyond Phillips and Johnson. Still look to see Edina get much better over the season and be tough out come playoff time. GR showed giod depth up front, still a question on the D. Will need to settle on goalie as season goes forward.
Were you at the game ?
I was there and I did not see what you people saw.
At least what's shocking to me is that you guys seem to easily give the 1st Period to GR.
I thought the first was a wash with stretches dominated by GR and stretches dominated by Edina. Edina had 3 or 4 very high quality scoring chances. I wouldn't say it was all GR. You can also see it in the stats : 8 shots for GR and 6 shots for Edina. It was close. Also several of these shots by Edina were on 2 on 1's, so great scoring chances.
Second period I totally agree was ALL GR , that's when they did most of the damage, played the entire period in Edina's zone, smothering Hornets.
12 shots for GR and 4 shots for Edina, clearly Edina got killed in this period.
Third was kind of a wash with GR dominating the first half of the third and Edina coming back at the end.
6 shots for GR and 12 shots for Edina although some shots were not quality shots by Edina.
Don't get me wrong, overall the game was dominated by GR because they completely took over the second period by storm. They played a great game and deserved the win, but I just don't understand your analysis of the game which to me, seems exaggerated.