Looks like girls teams listed as MCC and they don't show them playing this weekend on their cals.Gotothenetman wrote:I don't see that they have any girls teams?
Not sure
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, karl(east)
http://www.oshockey.org/page/show/2023107-os-shootoutGotothenetman wrote:Any updates on what all went down at the shootout?InigoMontoya wrote:Is the crème getting all whipped up?
Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
who are the top players on the 02/03 team?jg2112 wrote:Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
Vetter (goalie from Eden Prairie), Golnitz (defense from Forest Lake) and Baker (forward from Bauer-Emerson, going to Hill this fall) are probably the top three players. Each of them has played some U14 for O/S this year as well. Zumwinkle (Tonka), Gage (Orono), McGuire and Wohlers (Stillwater), Gerebi (C/C), Jackson (Mounds View) and Distad (Roseville) are also very good. There are also a couple of 03/04 girls who have played 02/03 the past two seasons and have improved a lot.Mavs wrote:who are the top players on the 02/03 team?jg2112 wrote:Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
Thanks. Look forward to seeing them this fall. I watched once in the spring and there is some very good talent.jg2112 wrote:Vetter (goalie from Eden Prairie), Golnitz (defense from Forest Lake) and Baker (forward from Bauer-Emerson, going to Hill this fall) are probably the top three players. Each of them has played some U14 for O/S this year as well. Zumwinkle (Tonka), Gage (Orono), McGuire and Wohlers (Stillwater), Gerebi (C/C), Jackson (Mounds View) and Distad (Roseville) are also very good. There are also a couple of 03/04 girls who have played 02/03 the past two seasons and have improved a lot.Mavs wrote:who are the top players on the 02/03 team?jg2112 wrote: Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
I agree, the Machine 02 is a very nice team. They remind me a lot of the the Os Select 01's last year when they were playing up in most tournaments...only bigger.jg2112 wrote:Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
I agree, the Machine 02 is a very nice team. They remind me a lot of the the Os Select 01's last year when they were playing up in most tournaments...only bigger.jg2112 wrote:Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
You must have saw them before all their kids got into town. When they played us they were really good hustled all over the rink very physical. You could tell that the OS teams were coming off a long break. First two games my daughter a 51 shots 47 saves. Second game 44 shots 43 saves then averaged 25 the rest of the way. Agin missing two of our best players.titleist wrote:I agree, the Machine 02 is a very nice team. They remind me a lot of the the Os Select 01's last year when they were playing up in most tournaments...only bigger.jg2112 wrote:Yeah, that Colorado U12 team was insane. I couldn't believe the power of their shooting, as well as the size of those 12-year-olds.zambonidriver wrote:Great week end of Hockey. Colorado brought 2 really good teams. Machine 02 played really well changed my opinion of them. So much girls talent nation wide.
The 02/03 O/S team had a nice victory against the Young Americans on Friday. However, they took two defeats from the Kodiaks.
I wasn't that impressed with the Colorado team. I saw them get waxed this weekend as the U14's. They had two really nice players, but after that seem to have lost depth quickly...and they only had two lines on the bench when I saw them... tough tournament to play with only two lines.
You must have saw them before all their kids got into town. When they played us they were really good hustled all over the rink very physical. You could tell that the OS teams were coming off a long break. First two games my daughter a 51 shots 47 saves. Second game 44 shots 43 saves then averaged 25 the rest of the way. Agin missing two of our best players.
one of the best games of the weekend was the colorado u-14 team against Machine 02 that went to a shoot out. The Colorado teams were very well coached. Another great game was the 01 OS against the 02 machine the 02 machine actually were ahead for most of the game. Tarasov congrats on your daughter making the u-18 national team you must be very proud.InigoMontoya wrote:Well, that's a shame. I was hoping we'd get the much-hyped match up between the Os Selects 01 and the 01/02 Os Selects. Instead the 01 team played the CO team-missing best players, then after the CO best players arrived, they played the 01/02 team-missing best players. Hmm, it seems to me the crème should include the best players. Have either of the two teams with 'Chicago' in the name played at any of the other local gatherings? Would be interesting to see how they fared against the little MG kids that did OK playing up in Blaine.
The shootout is a showcase not a tourney correct?zambonidriver wrote:I was struck by a comment during the shoot out by a goalie parent from another team which illustrates the difference between OS and other programs.
My daughter was filling in for the Colorado u-12 team in goal during one of their games. The parent accosted me seemingly very upset that my daughter was playing for another team. Double rostered was the term he used. My reaction was like he was talking martian. He was right though my daughter was not playing on her normal team. Then at halftime of that game she left the ice and filled in on another rink that was short a goalie. The weird thing was we looked at what was going on as totally normal as that is how Winny runs her stuff you go where you are needed. Ice time and playing are whats important trophies are not. I think that's why Winny's program keeps growing. It was a concept that other goalie dad couldn't comprehend.
And isn't it a pretty pricey jamboree? The dollar amount I heard a kid had to pitch in to play on her team caught me a little off guard. Unless the coach was making a little profit on the weekend, that amount times even just 15 skaters would make it about twice the cost of some other local tourney options.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:The shootout is a showcase not a tourney correct?zambonidriver wrote:I was struck by a comment during the shoot out by a goalie parent from another team which illustrates the difference between OS and other programs.
My daughter was filling in for the Colorado u-12 team in goal during one of their games. The parent accosted me seemingly very upset that my daughter was playing for another team. Double rostered was the term he used. My reaction was like he was talking martian. He was right though my daughter was not playing on her normal team. Then at halftime of that game she left the ice and filled in on another rink that was short a goalie. The weird thing was we looked at what was going on as totally normal as that is how Winny runs her stuff you go where you are needed. Ice time and playing are whats important trophies are not. I think that's why Winny's program keeps growing. It was a concept that other goalie dad couldn't comprehend.
My understanding is it's just a series of games. My daughter played 5-6 games with 3 different teams. There were no finals. Just a Jamboree-style event.InigoMontoya wrote:And isn't it a pretty pricey jamboree? The dollar amount I heard a kid had to pitch in to play on her team caught me a little off guard. Unless the coach was making a little profit on the weekend, that amount times even just 15 skaters would make it about twice the cost of some other local tourney options.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:The shootout is a showcase not a tourney correct?zambonidriver wrote:I was struck by a comment during the shoot out by a goalie parent from another team which illustrates the difference between OS and other programs.
My daughter was filling in for the Colorado u-12 team in goal during one of their games. The parent accosted me seemingly very upset that my daughter was playing for another team. Double rostered was the term he used. My reaction was like he was talking martian. He was right though my daughter was not playing on her normal team. Then at halftime of that game she left the ice and filled in on another rink that was short a goalie. The weird thing was we looked at what was going on as totally normal as that is how Winny runs her stuff you go where you are needed. Ice time and playing are whats important trophies are not. I think that's why Winny's program keeps growing. It was a concept that other goalie dad couldn't comprehend.
InigoMontoya wrote:And isn't it a pretty pricey jamboree? The dollar amount I heard a kid had to pitch in to play on her team caught me a little off guard. Unless the coach was making a little profit on the weekend, that amount times even just 15 skaters would make it about twice the cost of some other local tourney options.Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:IDK part of the price for our team which is more than reasonablezambonidriver wrote:I was struck by a comment during the shoot out by a goalie parent from another team which illustrates the difference between OS and other programs.
My daughter was filling in for the Colorado u-12 team in goal during one of their games. The parent accosted me seemingly very upset that my daughter was playing for another team. Double rostered was the term he used. My reaction was like he was talking martian. He was right though my daughter was not playing on her normal team. Then at halftime of that game she left the ice and filled in on another rink that was short a goalie. The weird thing was we looked at what was going on as totally normal as that is how Winny runs her stuff you go where you are needed. Ice time and playing are whats important trophies are not. I think that's why Winny's program keeps growing. It was a concept that other goalie dad couldn't comprehend.
The shootout is a showcase not a tourney correct?