City Pages cover story: "Assault on the State of Hockey
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
I realize it's unfashionable to praise him these days because he's viewed as soft and not "fiery" enough, but Joe Mauer was the top pick in the baseball draft, an all-state basketball player, and the USA Today national high school football player of the year, so any discussion about Minnesota's best high school athlete pretty much has to include him.
Referring back to the topic of this thread, you have to be really careful here - I've been guilty of it myself plenty of times - about deciding you know what's best for other people. It might seem odd to us, but some kids might end up not regretting the move even if they don't make it to the NHL. This was written by a player from Michigan who chose major junior over college, ended up not making the NHL, and doesn't regret it (https://brandonarchibald.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/4/):
"I spent five seasons in the OHL, amassed over 290 games and was once an NHL draft pick. An injury forced me from the game for good early in my overage season and I took advantage of the education package I was given when I signed my OHL contract in 2008. But there is something most people aren’t hearing; I wouldn’t trade it for the world. Those five years were the best years both on and off the ice I had ever had. I’ve made memories and lifelong friendships that go beyond the dream of being a National Hockey League player.
"The move to Major Junior hockey instead of college was simply for the fact that my family and I believed it provided the best opportunity to further my career on the ice. We researched and talked to former families and players on their thoughts of the major junior “route” versus college and had a good agent that didn’t push me one way or the other. When it came time we made sure we had a good education package because lets face the facts, not everyone makes the NHL and no one can play forever. I knew exactly what I was getting into when I signed the dotted line . . . ."
Referring back to the topic of this thread, you have to be really careful here - I've been guilty of it myself plenty of times - about deciding you know what's best for other people. It might seem odd to us, but some kids might end up not regretting the move even if they don't make it to the NHL. This was written by a player from Michigan who chose major junior over college, ended up not making the NHL, and doesn't regret it (https://brandonarchibald.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/4/):
"I spent five seasons in the OHL, amassed over 290 games and was once an NHL draft pick. An injury forced me from the game for good early in my overage season and I took advantage of the education package I was given when I signed my OHL contract in 2008. But there is something most people aren’t hearing; I wouldn’t trade it for the world. Those five years were the best years both on and off the ice I had ever had. I’ve made memories and lifelong friendships that go beyond the dream of being a National Hockey League player.
"The move to Major Junior hockey instead of college was simply for the fact that my family and I believed it provided the best opportunity to further my career on the ice. We researched and talked to former families and players on their thoughts of the major junior “route” versus college and had a good agent that didn’t push me one way or the other. When it came time we made sure we had a good education package because lets face the facts, not everyone makes the NHL and no one can play forever. I knew exactly what I was getting into when I signed the dotted line . . . ."
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
92 players have made their NHL debut this season (so far). 42 are Canadian. 20 are American. The remaining 30 are European.imlisteningtothefnsong wrote:If only 3% of the 36,000 high school players play D1 and only 40 USA born kids make it to the few morning skates with the NHL, where are the bulk of majority of the draft picks/NHLer's coming from? Perhaps it's the CHL
22 players came straight from a European league. 24 last played amateur hockey in the NCAA. The remaining 46 played in the CHL.
Two Americans (10%) played in the CHL prior to their debut in the NHL this season. Six Canadians (14%) played in the NCAA prior to their debut in the NHL this season.
About 340 D1 hockey players graduated from college last year. Some of them debuted in the NHL this year. About 600 player aged out of the CHL last year. None of them have graduated yet.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:28 am
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:28 am
Still doesn't change the fact that he was all state in 3 sports in HS. I think his academics more than anything left his star to fizzle out with tDon.GoBigorGoHome wrote:Dan Welch - early developer. Late bloomers eventually caught up leaving his star to fizzle out.Sats81 wrote:Dan Welch-best athlete. All State Hockey, All state Baseball, All State Football. D1 hockey, could have played baseball at the U as well and probably could have played d1 football too.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:28 am
No argument against him being a decent high school athlete. Under-sized for D1 football, so it's quite a stretch to say he probably could have played football too. Best athlete argument mandates staying power, which Winfield clearly had, and Welch and many others didn't.Sats81 wrote:Still doesn't change the fact that he was all state in 3 sports in HS. I think his academics more than anything left his star to fizzle out with tDon.GoBigorGoHome wrote:Dan Welch - early developer. Late bloomers eventually caught up leaving his star to fizzle out.Sats81 wrote:Dan Welch-best athlete. All State Hockey, All state Baseball, All State Football. D1 hockey, could have played baseball at the U as well and probably could have played d1 football too.
He was more then "a decent high school athlete", and he was 5'10" 200 lbs, I don't think his size would have been an issue playing RB or safety at the college level....GoBigorGoHome wrote:No argument against him being a decent high school athlete. Under-sized for D1 football, so it's quite a stretch to say he probably could have played football too. Best athlete argument mandates staying power, which Winfield clearly had, and Welch and many others didn't.Sats81 wrote:Still doesn't change the fact that he was all state in 3 sports in HS. I think his academics more than anything left his star to fizzle out with tDon.GoBigorGoHome wrote: Dan Welch - early developer. Late bloomers eventually caught up leaving his star to fizzle out.
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:43 pm
What if the WHL is viewed as an opportunity to play, while gaining some money to offset the cost of a college education eventually? If the $15000 per year is correct, that's not too bad. As good as a 529 plan--LOL.
My guess is, that for an American, you would want to play in one of the US markets just to have a normal HS education.
Just a thought.
I can't see many American boys being happy living up in Saskatoon though.
My guess is, that for an American, you would want to play in one of the US markets just to have a normal HS education.
Just a thought.
I can't see many American boys being happy living up in Saskatoon though.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:28 am
Yes, his size would have most certainly been an issue for D1, unless he could run a sub-4.6 second 40 yard dash, which maybe he could, I don't know. Even if he could, it's still quite a stretch to say "he probably could have played D1 football".Sats81 wrote:He was more then "a decent high school athlete", and he was 5'10" 200 lbs, I don't think his size would have been an issue playing RB or safety at the college level....GoBigorGoHome wrote:No argument against him being a decent high school athlete. Under-sized for D1 football, so it's quite a stretch to say he probably could have played football too. Best athlete argument mandates staying power, which Winfield clearly had, and Welch and many others didn't.Sats81 wrote: Still doesn't change the fact that he was all state in 3 sports in HS. I think his academics more than anything left his star to fizzle out with tDon.
I'll guess we will just agree to disagree.GoBigorGoHome wrote:Yes, his size would have most certainly been an issue for D1, unless he could run a sub-4.6 second 40 yard dash, which maybe he could, I don't know. Even if he could, it's still quite a stretch to say "he probably could have played D1 football".Sats81 wrote:He was more then "a decent high school athlete", and he was 5'10" 200 lbs, I don't think his size would have been an issue playing RB or safety at the college level....GoBigorGoHome wrote: No argument against him being a decent high school athlete. Under-sized for D1 football, so it's quite a stretch to say he probably could have played football too. Best athlete argument mandates staying power, which Winfield clearly had, and Welch and many others didn't.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
The major item left out of that article are the stipulations that the WHL education package has. I'm somewhat surprised it wasn't mentioned because that is certainly a key factor to contemplate when you are trying to figure out what you want to do for your kid.
I've always said that there is no one "right" decision for everybody. I am not sure why people insist on thinking that if a kid leaves HS hockey, he is somehow harming himself. Even as much as I think NCAA hockey is the best route to take, I recognize it isn't for everybody.
I've always said that there is no one "right" decision for everybody. I am not sure why people insist on thinking that if a kid leaves HS hockey, he is somehow harming himself. Even as much as I think NCAA hockey is the best route to take, I recognize it isn't for everybody.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
Yeah, as Gopher Blog mentioned, there are stipulations on that. Basically, if a kid plays a couple of seasons in the minors, that education package evaporates like a fart in the wind. If they guaranteed that money for at least 10 years or so, they'd have a much stronger proposition for all the top players. College hockey wouldn't disappear, but you'd see a few more high-end prospects heading north than what you see now. Some of the moderately talented Canadians would likely head south to fill the void.@hockeytweet wrote:What if the WHL is viewed as an opportunity to play, while gaining some money to offset the cost of a college education eventually? If the $15000 per year is correct, that's not too bad.
-
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
This is a hockey board, but even Dave Winfield doesn't match what Mauer did as a multiple sport athlete. Winfield was drafted as a novelty pick in a sport he wasn't playing.
Joe Mauer was good enough to play Div. I basketball. National POY in football. First overall pick in baseball. In a more modern era where it was more difficult to play multiple sports.
Winfield played college basketball on a very good Big Ten team and had an awesome professional baseball career.
Hard to argue for someone other than these guys.
Joe Mauer was good enough to play Div. I basketball. National POY in football. First overall pick in baseball. In a more modern era where it was more difficult to play multiple sports.
Winfield played college basketball on a very good Big Ten team and had an awesome professional baseball career.
Hard to argue for someone other than these guys.
Be kind. Rewind.
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:16 am
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:16 am
2013-14 had 305 University scholarships given out.About 600 player aged out of the CHL last year. None of them have graduated yet.
2014-15 has 317 University scholarships
622 full rides over two years, yes, they may not have graduated yet.... Still have 2-4 years of paid school until the cap-n-gown day.