CLASS A STATE TOURNAMENT SEEDING

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

fastncrash
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:42 pm

Post by fastncrash »

TheInsider wrote:
fastncrash wrote:
TheInsider wrote:Not to be a downer.. but.. Terrible tournament this year..
Holy Sh*t.... It's over already?

:roll:
Terrible field, whatever, you know what i meant smart a@@
Terrible field?

Luverne's used to taking Chirp like that, but I think a few of the other teams might take exception you your comments... :?
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Post by defense »

terrible field?? we will see. different? ya, that is what will happen when teams move around, is it not what was wanted?? sick of seeing the same champ???
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

I think Luverne gets the 4/5 seed out of respect for their record. I don't see NP being seeded, but they are going to give a top 3 seed all they can handle.

1- EGF
2- Hermantown
3- SCC
4- Mahto/TG
5- Luverne

Orono
NP
Chisago

Mahto could make a case for the 3 seed if they win tonight since they didn't play SCC. Plus, who wouldn't want to see Luverne take on the tourneys only private school?
oldschoolpuckster
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:51 am

Post by oldschoolpuckster »

LuVerne is a great story!! No way they are ranked and they will go 0-2. Not a hater...actually a fan. Young team that will be around a while. I wish them best of luck!!
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Post by defense »

A lot of teams would go undefeated with Luverne schedule. But we have not had Cinderella in awhile...so go get em boys!
the thrill
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:44 pm

Post by the thrill »

oldschoolpuckster wrote:LuVerne is a great story!! No way they are ranked and they will go 0-2. Not a hater...actually a fan. Young team that will be around a while. I wish them best of luck!!
I don't agree. I think they are getting at least 1 win.

I do agree with you that they are young and will be around a while though.
HockeyBum
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:30 pm

Post by HockeyBum »

People from Luverne, aren't u tired of having this same ranking seeding conversation on a new post. The answer is the same. 5 teams are seeded based on coaches voting. An undefeated season is great but it doesn't warrant a higher seed than rankings or coaches, the coaches have proven themselves yearly that this seeding works. If to say Luverne get a random draw and they are as good as they think who they play shouldn't matter.

If TG
#1 EGF
#2 Hermantown
#3 #4 #5 Cathedral, TG or NP
Draw = Orono, Luverne CL

If Maht. Wins
#1 EGF
#2 Hermantown
#3 #4 #5 Cathedral, TG or NP
Draw = Orono, Luverne CL#1 EGF
#2 Hermantown
#3 #4 #5 Cathedral, Orono or NP
Draw = Luverne, Maht. CL

Here's my prediction of the bracket draws
1. East Grand Forks
Orono

4. Cathedral
5. TG or Maht.

2. Hermantown
Chisago Lakes

3. New Prague
Luverne
the thrill
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:44 pm

Post by the thrill »

What was there, about 3 or 4 posts pertaining to seeding on the 3A thread? Out of 48 pages?

I posted this topic because I was curious what everyone else thought the seeds may be. Obviously some think Luverne should be seeded, while others don't.

I feel there is a chance they slip into one of the top 5 seeds, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.

From a fan's perspective, it would be cool to see how each coach ranks the other 7.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Here is what i see.

Hermantown

EGF

Cathedral. Seperated themself by beating New Prague on the road. But barely.

After that all teams have very similar scores against common opponents. One of those teams is undefeated. The rest are not.

Luverne

New Prague

Totino

Orono

Chisago

Looking at the schedules of the 6 teams outside of EGF and Hermantown, the common opponents are all very close. Its really easy for people to mark off Luverne because they come from a historically weak section. This doesnt work for this season. Cathedral beat New Ulm on the road, and Totino at home. Earns them a 3 seed. They do have some ugly losses though.

Every team has ugly losses to explain.

Find out in the morning.

Luverne could be the three seed folks. Talk about traditional hockeyminds exploding.
My_Kid_Loves_Hockey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:25 am

Post by My_Kid_Loves_Hockey »

As somebody that has watched both Luverne and Chisago Lakes play against my sons team, there is no comparison; Chisago is better, more speed, more grit and also has goal scorers.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

what team is that? STMA?
hockey9011
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:34 pm

Post by hockey9011 »

notTONIGHT wrote:Here is what i see.

Hermantown

EGF

Cathedral. Seperated themself by beating New Prague on the road. But barely.

After that all teams have very similar scores against common opponents. One of those teams is undefeated. The rest are not.

Luverne

New Prague

Totino

Orono

Chisago

Looking at the schedules of the 6 teams outside of EGF and Hermantown, the common opponents are all very close. Its really easy for people to mark off Luverne because they come from a historically weak section. This doesnt work for this season. Cathedral beat New Ulm on the road, and Totino at home. Earns them a 3 seed. They do have some ugly losses though.

Every team has ugly losses to explain.

Find out in the morning.

Luverne could be the three seed folks. Talk about traditional hockeyminds exploding.
Which of cathedrals losses to you think are "ugly"? 5 of their 7 losses came against the top 8 teams in state while the other two were against solid teams who would compete for the 1 seed in 3A?
My_Kid_Loves_Hockey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:25 am

Post by My_Kid_Loves_Hockey »

Yes and that has what to do with it?

Chisago Lakes is better.

Good luck in the tourney.
Shortshift
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:01 am

Post by Shortshift »

Omg... Just give luverne the 1 seed so they quit digging up every excuse manageable...
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

notTONIGHT wrote:Luverne could be the three seed folks. Talk about traditional hockeyminds exploding.
I haven't seen Luverne play. Are you saying they are better than everyone but Hermantown and EGF entering the tournament, or you just want them seeded 3rd because they haven't lost? In which case, why not 1st?

I'm pulling for Luverne but can't see them higher than 5. The coaches will give the high seeds to teams they are familiar with.
urban iceman
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:40 am

Post by urban iceman »

TheInsider wrote:Not to be a downer.. but.. Terrible tournament this year..
Then dont watch debbie
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

My_Kid_Loves_Hockey wrote:Yes and that has what to do with it?

Chisago Lakes is better.

Good luck in the tourney.
Because that was one of luvernes worst games and they still won.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

hockey9011 wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:Here is what i see.

Hermantown

EGF

Cathedral. Seperated themself by beating New Prague on the road. But barely.

After that all teams have very similar scores against common opponents. One of those teams is undefeated. The rest are not.

Luverne

New Prague

Totino

Orono

Chisago

Looking at the schedules of the 6 teams outside of EGF and Hermantown, the common opponents are all very close. Its really easy for people to mark off Luverne because they come from a historically weak section. This doesnt work for this season. Cathedral beat New Ulm on the road, and Totino at home. Earns them a 3 seed. They do have some ugly losses though.

Every team has ugly losses to explain.

Find out in the morning.

Luverne could be the three seed folks. Talk about traditional hockeyminds exploding.
Which of cathedrals losses to you think are "ugly"? 5 of their 7 losses came against the top 8 teams in state while the other two were against solid teams who would compete for the 1 seed in 3A?
I agree. Ugly was the wrong term. None of them were ugly, however they exist. Luverne has no losses to explain.
hockey9011
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:34 pm

Post by hockey9011 »

notTONIGHT wrote:
hockey9011 wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:Here is what i see.

Hermantown

EGF

Cathedral. Seperated themself by beating New Prague on the road. But barely.

After that all teams have very similar scores against common opponents. One of those teams is undefeated. The rest are not.

Luverne

New Prague

Totino

Orono

Chisago

Looking at the schedules of the 6 teams outside of EGF and Hermantown, the common opponents are all very close. Its really easy for people to mark off Luverne because they come from a historically weak section. This doesnt work for this season. Cathedral beat New Ulm on the road, and Totino at home. Earns them a 3 seed. They do have some ugly losses though.

Every team has ugly losses to explain.

Find out in the morning.

Luverne could be the three seed folks. Talk about traditional hockeyminds exploding.
Which of cathedrals losses to you think are "ugly"? 5 of their 7 losses came against the top 8 teams in state while the other two were against solid teams who would compete for the 1 seed in 3A?
I agree. Ugly was the wrong term. None of them were ugly, however they exist. Luverne has no losses to explain.
That's true. I was confused at the word ugly cause I think all 7 teams they lost to would beat or be a good game with Luverne
My_Kid_Loves_Hockey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:25 am

Post by My_Kid_Loves_Hockey »

notTONIGHT wrote:
My_Kid_Loves_Hockey wrote:Yes and that has what to do with it?

Chisago Lakes is better.

Good luck in the tourney.
Because that was one of luvernes worst games and they still won.
Of course it was I won't have expected any other response from you.

Your on here trumpeting for a high seed with your opinions but don't like it when I give mine off of the games my sons team played against 2 of the teams in the mix. :oops: :oops: :oops:

As I said above good luck in the tourny :wink: :wink:
ted2you
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:02 pm
Location: Chaska

Ugly Tournament

Post by ted2you »

This was a difficult season in one way. It was a great year for 1A Hockey, Unfortunately it may not carry over to the state tournament. Sections were great.

1. EGF eliminated #3 Warroad in double OT
2. Hermantown beat #5 Marshall
3. Breck was upset by Orono

#7 Mankato West was eliminated by #6 New Prague.
#8 Totino-Grace beat #9 Mahtomedi
10. St. Cloud Cathedral survived.

This tournament was always going to probably be a 3 team race and with Breck losing, the field really suffered. Many of the other teams that could have competed already lost to elite teams and leaving some holes in the tournament.

Imagine how much fun this tournament could have been:

The 1A tournament I'd have loved to see would have been
1. EGF
2. Hermantown
3. Warroad
4. Breck
5. Duluth Marshall
Play in games between New Prague v Duluth Denfield
Mankato West V Mahtomedi
Luverne v Totino Grace

Don't get me wrong, I don't feel sorry for Breck, they lost to a lower ranked team. In this feild a team like TRF would be difficult to beat.

While I get the history of the Section system and the natural rivalry, if you really wanted the best feild for the 1A tournament they should scrap the Section system and rank teams for post season.

IMO, It will never happen, because everyone wants to give teams a chance to make it to the tournament. But clearly the top teams played in three sections this season, making the section tournaments in 7A and 8A probably more difficult than the State Tournament.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Re: Ugly Tournament

Post by puckbreath »

ted2you wrote:This was a difficult season in one way. It was a great year for 1A Hockey, Unfortunately it may not carry over to the state tournament. Sections were great.

1. EGF eliminated #3 Warroad in double OT
2. Hermantown beat #5 Marshall
3. Breck was upset by Orono

#7 Mankato West was eliminated by #6 New Prague.
#8 Totino-Grace beat #9 Mahtomedi
10. St. Cloud Cathedral survived.

This tournament was always going to probably be a 3 team race and with Breck losing, the field really suffered. Many of the other teams that could have competed already lost to elite teams and leaving some holes in the tournament.

Imagine how much fun this tournament could have been:

The 1A tournament I'd have loved to see would have been
1. EGF
2. Hermantown
3. Warroad
4. Breck
5. Duluth Marshall
Play in games between New Prague v Duluth Denfield
Mankato West V Mahtomedi
Luverne v Totino Grace

Don't get me wrong, I don't feel sorry for Breck, they lost to a lower ranked team. In this feild a team like TRF would be difficult to beat.

While I get the history of the Section system and the natural rivalry, if you really wanted the best feild for the 1A tournament they should scrap the Section system and rank teams for post season.

IMO, It will never happen, because everyone wants to give teams a chance to make it to the tournament. But clearly the top teams played in three sections this season, making the section tournaments in 7A and 8A probably more difficult than the State Tournament.
It is interesting, but at the same time, the metro sections go through this most every year (good teams not making it).

And trf would still struggle, even with this field. Weak forwards, both on offense and defense.
sterfry9
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by sterfry9 »

fastncrash wrote:8 qualified. 8 names in the Hat, random draw to fill the slots... and then: "Let's Dance!".
admin can you guys temp ban people here? this is simply lololol
Scout14
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Re: Ugly Tournament

Post by Scout14 »

puckbreath wrote:
ted2you wrote:This was a difficult season in one way. It was a great year for 1A Hockey, Unfortunately it may not carry over to the state tournament. Sections were great.

1. EGF eliminated #3 Warroad in double OT
2. Hermantown beat #5 Marshall
3. Breck was upset by Orono

#7 Mankato West was eliminated by #6 New Prague.
#8 Totino-Grace beat #9 Mahtomedi
10. St. Cloud Cathedral survived.

This tournament was always going to probably be a 3 team race and with Breck losing, the field really suffered. Many of the other teams that could have competed already lost to elite teams and leaving some holes in the tournament.

Imagine how much fun this tournament could have been:

The 1A tournament I'd have loved to see would have been
1. EGF
2. Hermantown
3. Warroad
4. Breck
5. Duluth Marshall
Play in games between New Prague v Duluth Denfield
Mankato West V Mahtomedi
Luverne v Totino Grace

Don't get me wrong, I don't feel sorry for Breck, they lost to a lower ranked team. In this feild a team like TRF would be difficult to beat.

While I get the history of the Section system and the natural rivalry, if you really wanted the best feild for the 1A tournament they should scrap the Section system and rank teams for post season.

IMO, It will never happen, because everyone wants to give teams a chance to make it to the tournament. But clearly the top teams played in three sections this season, making the section tournaments in 7A and 8A probably more difficult than the State Tournament.
It is interesting, but at the same time, the metro sections go through this most every year (good teams not making it).

And trf would still struggle, even with this field. Weak forwards, both on offense and defense.
I've got a feeling, a feeling deep inside
Oh yeah, oh yeah.
I've got a feeling, a feeling I can't hide
Oh no, oh no, oh no.
Yeah, I've got a feeling.

Oh please believe me, I'd hate to miss the cardinal bus
Oh yeah, oh yeah.
And if you leave me I won't be late again
Oh no, oh no, oh no.
Yeah, I've got a feeling, yeah.

All these years I've been wandering around,
Wondering how come nobody told me
All that I was looking for was somebody
Who looked like you.

I've got a feeling, that keeps me on my toes
Oh yeah, oh yeah.

I've got a feeling, I think that everybody knows
Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah.
Yeah, yeah, I've got a feeling, yeah.
Yeah

Ev'rybody had a hard year
Ev'rybody had a good time
Ev'rybody had a wet dream,
Ev'rybody saw the sunshine
Oh yeah, oh yeah.

Ev'rybody had a good year,
Ev'rybody let their hair down,
Ev'rybody pulled their socks up,
Ev'rybody put their foot down.
Oh yeah, oh yeah.

Yeah I've got a feeling
A feeling deep inside
Oh yeah, oh yeah.

I've got a feeling, a feeling I can't hide
Oh no
Oh no no no

Yeah yeah yeah yeah
I've got a feeling!!

ROLL CARDS ROLL!!!
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Re: Ugly Tournament

Post by defense »

ted2you wrote:This was a difficult season in one way. It was a great year for 1A Hockey, Unfortunately it may not carry over to the state tournament. Sections were great.

1. EGF eliminated #3 Warroad in double OT
2. Hermantown beat #5 Marshall
3. Breck was upset by Orono

#7 Mankato West was eliminated by #6 New Prague.
#8 Totino-Grace beat #9 Mahtomedi
10. St. Cloud Cathedral survived.

This tournament was always going to probably be a 3 team race and with Breck losing, the field really suffered. Many of the other teams that could have competed already lost to elite teams and leaving some holes in the tournament.

Imagine how much fun this tournament could have been:

The 1A tournament I'd have loved to see would have been
1. EGF
2. Hermantown
3. Warroad
4. Breck
5. Duluth Marshall
Play in games between New Prague v Duluth Denfield
Mankato West V Mahtomedi
Luverne v Totino Grace

Don't get me wrong, I don't feel sorry for Breck, they lost to a lower ranked team. In this feild a team like TRF would be difficult to beat.

While I get the history of the Section system and the natural rivalry, if you really wanted the best feild for the 1A tournament they should scrap the Section system and rank teams for post season.

IMO, It will never happen, because everyone wants to give teams a chance to make it to the tournament. But clearly the top teams played in three sections this season, making the section tournaments in 7A and 8A probably more difficult than the State Tournament.
very nice. but the mshsl is not set up like that for ANY sport much less hockey. Instead they try to represent different geographic regions. Just is the way they do it.
Post Reply