I know. Just want to hear his opinion on the game..notTONIGHT wrote:MrGoalieBoy wrote:Were you at the game tonight Scout? What did you get out of the game?
He was there.....

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
I give up on this Spaghetti deal.... WAY TOO INACCURATE!fastncrash wrote:As 100 million people found out last night... "Anything can happen!".MrGoalieBoy wrote:IMO something would have to go severely wrong for Luverne if Windom would win this game, a lot more than having a bad attitude..
You need to show up and play the game.
I think Luverne has a good chance tonight as my "Spaghetti test" shows them winning 8-1 with a LOT of players getting to see the ice tonight.
Friday, I'm picking Luverne over Hutch 4-1.
Like I said in an earlier post, I've followed this thread since Day 1. I live in NE MN so I have no dog in the fight. I admire 3A Scout's passion for the game and the effort that he puts in to post and promote the game. But having said that, it is very obvious to me that he has had a bias towards Luverne from the start. For the life of me, I can't figure out why this is. Maybe he is a hardcore fan of a certain team, lives in that town, etc. I have no idea.wooshlager wrote:3A's thoughts on the game.
1.) Hutch must be down this year.
2.) It was the young goalies fault for hutch.
3.) Luverne should have called off the dogs after they got up 1-0. How dare they try to score more goals.
4.) Luverne is collapsing, not a good showing, they needed to win 14-0.
5.) Luverne better hope they dont have to play Marshall cause Campion has their number.
Froggy Richards wrote:Agreed, it is a very interesting story for 3A. Huge win for Luverne last night..IMO Hutch is a very overrated team especially with their lack of skill at the goaltender position, and Luverne must have played very well, holding Hutch to 19 shots, a team who put 50 on NEW ULM........wooshlager wrote:3A's thoughts on the game.
Like I said in an earlier post, I've followed this thread since Day 1. I live in NE MN so I have no dog in the fight. I admire 3A Scout's passion for the game and the effort that he puts in to post and promote the game. But having said that, it is very obvious to me that he has had a bias towards Luverne from the start. For the life of me, I can't figure out why this is. Maybe he is a hardcore fan of a certain team, lives in that town, etc. I have no idea.
This is an exciting team and a great story. I read the Let's Play Hockey article last night and I'm rooting for Luverne. I think most Hockey people would be.
3A Scout, I acknowledge that you've come around over the last three months. You went from hating on Luverne to showing a little bit of respect for them, but not that much. From a Hockey fan in Duluth, please answer a question for me. What in the world do you have against Luverne?????????
And I see where Cowger -3A Scout's choice to destroy Luverne- put up 0 goals and 0 assists. Must have been the Hutch goalie's fault.notTONIGHT wrote:Run time third period in Hutch
The overrated cards from Luverne put it on the tigers in a 7-1 final.
32/19 shots in favor of Luverne.
Luverne will see hutch on Saturday in gustavus, unless campion has something to say about it.....
I think Hutch basically through in the towel last night after the second. Goaltender has been an issue all year apparently and still is. After the second it was 5-1 and maybe 2 were legit goals. Luverne will represent 3A well if they can make it. As long as they can stay away from the top 3. Hermantown and Breck are no easy task for anyone in the state. I do however think that Luverne's goalie potentially could give them a shot against a lot of 1A schools. Tough to judge a kid that has not scene a lot of shots all season but he seems to move around pretty good and plays his angles well.Teak wrote:And I see where Cowger -3A Scout's choice to destroy Luverne- put up 0 goals and 0 assists. Must have been the Hutch goalie's fault.notTONIGHT wrote:Run time third period in Hutch
The overrated cards from Luverne put it on the tigers in a 7-1 final.
32/19 shots in favor of Luverne.
Luverne will see hutch on Saturday in gustavus, unless campion has something to say about it.....
Unless Marshall has anything to say about it......notTONIGHT wrote:New Ulm with a significantly more convincing win over Litchfield today.
This is was a preview of the matchup we are all but guaranteed to see on thursday the 20th in New Ulm.
New Ulm should be the 3 seed, and Litch the 6 seed.
Looking like Willmar VS New Ulm, and Luverne VS Hutch on Saturday at gustavus!
Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Hutch 5 Mound Westonka 3
Hutch wins a big in Mound a team who hammered both Willmar and NU this season. Looks like the Senior Allen got the start and was very solid stopping 34 of 37 shots.
Beware of Hutch they are a dangerous team> If they get solid tending they can beat anyone in this section. Just need to put 3 games together.
Agreed with notTONIGHT..seriously Scout. Luverne beats Hutch 7-1 last night, Allen does NOT make a 6 goal difference in that game..I disagree majorly with you, with solid goaltending, Hutch would maybe, MAYBE be the third best team in this sectionnotTONIGHT wrote:What an arrogant statement and just plain dumb...Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Hutch 5 Mound Westonka 3
Hutch wins a big in Mound a team who hammered both Willmar and NU this season. Looks like the Senior Allen got the start and was very solid stopping 34 of 37 shots. Beware of Hutch they are a dangerous team> If they get solid tending they can beat anyone in this section. Just need to put 3 games together.
We will see in 2 weeks when Hutch and Luverne meet again. I think it will be a much different game. Mound is a good club to beat them on their ice today shows that Hutch is a solid team. Any of the top 4 have a great chance at winning this section.MrGoalieBoy wrote:Agreed with notTONIGHT..seriously Scout. Luverne beats Hutch 7-1 last night, Allen does NOT make a 6 goal difference in that game..I disagree majorly with you, with solid goaltending, Hutch would maybe, MAYBE be the third best team in this sectionnotTONIGHT wrote:What an arrogant statement and just plain dumb...Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Hutch 5 Mound Westonka 3
Hutch wins a big in Mound a team who hammered both Willmar and NU this season. Looks like the Senior Allen got the start and was very solid stopping 34 of 37 shots. Beware of Hutch they are a dangerous team> If they get solid tending they can beat anyone in this section. Just need to put 3 games together.
That statement leans more on the dumb side.Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Many wrote Hutch and Marshall off last year as well. Did we learn nothing from that??
Anything can happen in the playoffs. Hutch was in the Section Final last year. Luverne had a wonderful team last year that choked.
I dont think my statement is arrogant at all.
Alright, I respect your opinion! it will be a very interesting for final four this year, I wish we could skip this last week and go right to playoffs!!Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Many wrote Hutch and Marshall off last year as well. Did we learn nothing from that??
Anything can happen in the playoffs. Hutch was in the Section Final last year. Luverne had a wonderful team last year that choked.
I dont think my statement is arrogant at all.
notTonight Luverne also destroyed Marshall 7-0 before they chocked last year in the playoffs. I guess we will have to see if they can show up when it counts this year. History not on their side.notTONIGHT wrote:That statement leans more on the dumb side.Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Many wrote Hutch and Marshall off last year as well. Did we learn nothing from that??
Anything can happen in the playoffs. Hutch was in the Section Final last year. Luverne had a wonderful team last year that choked.
I dont think my statement is arrogant at all.
Luverne absolutely waylaid Hutch less than 24 hours ago.
Have a drink and rethink this thing buddy.....
What number jersey does history wear? History got a wicked wrister? Or maybe history can fill the pipes??Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:notTonight Luverne also destroyed Marshall 7-0 before they chocked last year in the playoffs. I guess we will have to see if they can show up when it counts this year. History not on their side.notTONIGHT wrote:That statement leans more on the dumb side.Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Many wrote Hutch and Marshall off last year as well. Did we learn nothing from that??
Anything can happen in the playoffs. Hutch was in the Section Final last year. Luverne had a wonderful team last year that choked.
I dont think my statement is arrogant at all.
Luverne absolutely waylaid Hutch less than 24 hours ago.
Have a drink and rethink this thing buddy.....