Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!

Tuuk2score · Post by **Tuuk2score** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:29 pm

Blades take 3 of 4 from Shattuck sm u16 boys ... Playing the last of 4 meetings today the blades beat Ssm 8~5 to wrap up the season!!! Next stop for the Blades is Chicago NikeBauer tournament.... Good luck Men! [/u]

old goalie85 · Post by **old goalie85** » Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:19 pm

Roster anyone ???

Tuuk2score · Post by **Tuuk2score** » Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:19 pm

www.minnesotablades.com u16 midget minor[/url]

icehornet · Post by **icehornet** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:59 am

Tuuk2score wrote:www.minnesotablades.com u16 midget minor[/url]

That doesn't show the roster.

SuperStar · Post by **SuperStar** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:56 am

But remember the Shattuck U16 team has 13 - '96 aged players on the roster with 3 of them being 9th graders....

I doubt the Blades have any 96's. They are 95's that are in 11th grade as of now I suspect...(last time I saw that rooster online anyways, which was a few weeks back)

But nice to see a Minnesota group win, no doubt...Lets not get too exclamation pointy excited.

DMom · Post by **DMom** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:29 am

I am sure that the roster is fairly fluid given all of the fall commitments these kids have. I had the opportunity to see the team once and on that occasion it was more than 50% 96s, with at least one 9th grader, and it was still a very good team.

D6Rocks · Post by **D6Rocks** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:24 am

Tuuk2score wrote:Blades take 3 of 4 from Shattuck sm u16 boys ... Playing the last of 4 meetings today the blades beat Ssm 8~5 to wrap up the season!!! Next stop for the Blades is Chicago NikeBauer tournament.... Good luck Men! [/u]

How exciting!!!!

Snap Happy · Post by **Snap Happy** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:49 am

SuperStar wrote:But remember the Shattuck U16 team has 13 - '96 aged players on the roster with 3 of them being 9th graders....

I doubt the Blades have any 96's. They are 95's that are in 11th grade as of now I suspect...(last time I saw that rooster online anyways, which was a few weeks back)

But nice to see a Minnesota group win, no doubt...Lets not get too exclamation pointy excited.

There's always someone with a disclaimer..........

SuperStar · Post by **SuperStar** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:57 am

Okay, but is is a awesome to see them win a game 8-5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seriously - Its nice to see them beat Shattuck U16 team a couple games in a row.. , even after they lost 4-6 to them a couple weeks ago.. Go out and win the Bauer NIT, then I will be impresssed.

5 For Fighting · Post by **5 For Fighting** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:41 pm

Tuuk2score wrote:Blades take 3 of 4 from Shattuck sm u16 boys ... Playing the last of 4 meetings today the blades beat Ssm 8~5 to wrap up the season!!! Next stop for the Blades is Chicago NikeBauer tournament.... Good luck Men! [/u]

Is this the same group of kids that won the Young Guns Tourney in Philly this Spring? I had a chance to watch that squad...very impressive. I was thinking they would lose most of the 95 kids to Elite D.

Shoot · Post by **Shoot** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:18 pm

[quote="Tuuk2score"]Blades take 3 of 4 from Shattuck sm u16 boys ... Playing the last of 4 meetings today the blades beat Ssm 8~5 to wrap up the season!!! Next stop for the Blades is Chicago NikeBauer tournament.... Good luck Men! [/u][/quote]

This team has four 95's and 11 96's. Four of the 96 birth year players are ninth graders.

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:22 pm

icehornet wrote:
Tuuk2score wrote:www.minnesotablades.com u16 midget minor[/url]
That doesn't show the roster.

Try HERE

SuperStar · Post by **SuperStar** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:57 pm

Different roster than I saw a while back...Good for this group, keep going and have fun.

hockeyfan893 · Post by **hockeyfan893** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:53 pm

Why was this moved to youth hockey? These are high school aged kids playing other high school aged kids from, believe it or not, other high schools. Last time I checked, SSM was a school not a youth organization.

MoreCowBell · Post by **MoreCowBell** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:43 am

SuperStar wrote:But remember the Shattuck U16 team has 13 - '96 aged players on the roster with 3 of them being 9th graders....

I doubt the Blades have any 96's. They are 95's that are in 11th grade as of now I suspect...(last time I saw that rooster online anyways, which was a few weeks back)

But nice to see a Minnesota group win, no doubt...Lets not get too exclamation pointy excited.

Keep in mind that Shattucks top 95's are on the Prep team or AAA Midgets not on the U-16.

Tuuk2score · Post by **Tuuk2score** » Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:37 pm

At this stage does age really matter?

InigoMontoya · Post by **InigoMontoya** » Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:41 am

Tuuk2score wrote:At this stage does age really matter??????? 95 96 same thing !!!!!!!!!!! I bet you ask S.S.M if the best players are on the prep team !!!!!!!!!!! this is there prep u16 team !!!!!!!!!!!! ohh The Blades are 2-0 today in Chicago!!!!!!!!!!!! Blades are younger than most u16 teams across the nation!!!!!!!!!!! looking at the program most teams are 95 heavy... AGE ? mute point..........

The point is incapable of speech?

hockeyfan893 · Post by **hockeyfan893** » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:50 pm

Blades just tied HC Russia 2-2 earlier this morning. Don't know anything about how the game went, just following their results here.

http://www.invitebauer.com/_boys/Schedules.htm

I think they need another win today to advance.

edgeless2 · Post by **edgeless2** » Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:10 pm

hockeyfan893 wrote:Blades just tied HC Russia 2-2 earlier this morning. Don't know anything about how the game went, just following their results here.

http://www.invitebauer.com/_boys/Schedules.htm

I think they need another win today to advance.

Any word on how they finished. I believe they made semi.

silentbutdeadly3139 · Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:06 am

edgeless2 wrote:
hockeyfan893 wrote:Blades just tied HC Russia 2-2 earlier this morning. Don't know anything about how the game went, just following their results here.

http://www.invitebauer.com/_boys/Schedules.htm

I think they need another win today to advance.
Any word on how they finished. I believe they made semi.

looks like they lost in semi's 2-1 to NJ team

http://www.pointstreak.com/players/play ... sonid=8135

hockeyfan893 · Post by **hockeyfan893** » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:22 pm

Certainly a performance to be proud of. If I'm not mistaken, I believe they were the only Minnesota team in the tournament. I'm glad these kids were able to represent their state.

How cool is it that they got to play the Russians too?!

Ugottobekiddingme · Post by **Ugottobekiddingme** » Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:03 am

hockeyfan893 wrote:Certainly a performance to be proud of. If I'm not mistaken, I believe they were the only Minnesota team in the tournament. I'm glad these kids were able to represent their state.

How cool is it that they got to play the Russians too?!

How many other Minnesota skaters/teams were considered for this event sponsered by....? Before considering being "legit", what were the individual final stats for the participants?...can't seem to find this posted. The Russians said nice job and keep up the good work.

silentbutdeadly3139 · Post by **silentbutdeadly3139** » Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:21 am

Ugottobekiddingme wrote:
hockeyfan893 wrote:Certainly a performance to be proud of. If I'm not mistaken, I believe they were the only Minnesota team in the tournament. I'm glad these kids were able to represent their state.

How cool is it that they got to play the Russians too?!
How many other Minnesota skaters/teams were considered for this event sponsered by....? Before considering being "legit", what were the individual final stats for the participants?...can't seem to find this posted. The Russians said nice job and keep up the good work.

What does sponser or final stats of participants have to do with this being "legit" or the team doing very well ?

Ugottobekiddingme · Post by **Ugottobekiddingme** » Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:50 am

If claims are made on a public forum of team legitimacy, than open up the books for all to see.

silentbutdeadly3139 · Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:55 pm

Ugottobekiddingme wrote:If claims are made on a public forum of team legitimacy, than open up the books for all to see.

Waht claims and what books are you refering to ?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!

Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!

Re: Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!

Re: Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!

Re: Minnesota U16 Blades Boys team is legit!!!!!!