Roseau v Moorhead. Round 2 Tuesay, January 25

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Cobber
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:09 pm

Post by Cobber »

Anyone know how the JV game went.
SPUDNUT
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Moorhead

Post by SPUDNUT »

Cobber wrote:Anyone know how the JV game went.


3-1 (eng) Taters
hipcheck
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:48 am

mystery team

Post by hipcheck »

Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
HockeyFan1
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: mystery team

Post by HockeyFan1 »

hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?
warriors41
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Re: mystery team

Post by warriors41 »

HockeyFan1 wrote:
hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?
This year is nothing like 2007. First off, that year the Spuds were #1 for most of the year and the Rams were right behind them at #2. The rams lost 2 games all year and both were to the spuds but they were close losses. With all that said, if both of these teams make the section finals, Ness and Lee and company won't be walking out of locker room to play the game. Both teams are less talented than 2007.

Either way, Bemidji is gonna give Moorhead a lot of trouble in sections. I know its hard to finally say that there is a third team is contention but lets not forget them.
HockeyFan1
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: mystery team

Post by HockeyFan1 »

warriors41 wrote:
HockeyFan1 wrote:
hipcheck wrote:Rams are a mystery this year. They have moderate talent, and when they put out, they are a contender. When they just show up, they look like a #4 seed at best.

I think the Spuds are in the drivers seat now, and from Tuesdays game, they look good enough to win section 8AA without any trouble.
Right, just like 2007?
This year is nothing like 2007. First off, that year the Spuds were #1 for most of the year and the Rams were right behind them at #2. The rams lost 2 games all year and both were to the spuds but they were close losses. With all that said, if both of these teams make the section finals, Ness and Lee and company won't be walking out of locker room to play the game. Both teams are less talented than 2007.

Either way, Bemidji is gonna give Moorhead a lot of trouble in sections. I know its hard to finally say that there is a third team is contention but lets not forget them.
My point is, in 2007 the Spuds were the favorite, and weren't expected to have any trouble getting past sections. That's why they play the game!
Pucklvr
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:32 am

Post by Pucklvr »

Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!
Potatohead9
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes

Post by Potatohead9 »

Pucklvr wrote:Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!
AGREED! Never count out Roseau. Way too much tradition and experience.
I think in Section 8AA seeded teams 1-4 (Bemidji, Moorhead, Roseau, Brainerd, and possibly Tech) theme will be who's HOT and who's NOT..... Having a heathly team would also help.
warriors41
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Post by warriors41 »

Potatohead9 wrote:
Pucklvr wrote:Simply said, Roseau is down this year. It happens! You can't expect them to be a powerhouse every year! I don't think it helped that Roseau had a few key players out but, that is the game. I am not blaming that for their loss. Moorhead was simply the better team that night. Oh, I forgot.... I wouldn't count Roseau out just yet. It seems to me that Roseau is a "Tournament Team." They tend to get things done when they have to!
AGREED! Never count out Roseau. Way too much tradition and experience.
I think in Section 8AA seeded teams 1-4 (Bemidji, Moorhead, Roseau, Brainerd, and possibly Tech) theme will be who's HOT and who's NOT..... Having a heathly team would also help.
Tech just beat Roseau 4-2 last night. Makes it even harder to place Roseau. It's hard to imagine them being a 4th or even 5th seed in the section tourny but it might happen this year
northwoods oldtimer
Posts: 2679
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm

Re: mystery team

Post by northwoods oldtimer »

Right, just like 2007?
Not even close my friend
Post Reply