Edina A bantam's quit

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

centennialhockey
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:10 pm

Post by centennialhockey »

Is anyone really surprised here regarding Edina and their coach's behavior? Edina is full of ex NHL'ers who walk around with bad hair. Oops where is that mirror again?

EDINA: Every day I am entitled
greybeard58
Posts: 2568
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:40 pm

Post by greybeard58 »

A few years ago the Edina A Bantam team left their 2nd place State Tournament trophy in the locker room at New Hope.

E--Every
D--Day
I--I
N--Need
A--Attention
sorno82
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:04 pm

Post by sorno82 »

A few years ago the Edina A Bantam team left their 2nd place State Tournament trophy in the locker room at New Hope.
Though not politically correct, I like it. Taking second place can be worse than not placing at all to the ultra competitive. We used to joke that we would drive over the second place trophy in the parking lot.

Quitting in the middle of of a third place game is pathetic or not showing up for the third game of pool play is childish. Walking away from a second place trophy is accepting nothing but the best from yourself.
GoldenBear
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:38 am

Post by GoldenBear »

I love everyone's comments for those that weren't there or don't know what transpired. I have children that have competed against Edina teams the past six years coached by the two current Bantam A coaches...in the summer and in the winter. I speak for the majority in that I'd enjoy having both coach my kids. These are two guys that are donating their time to coach Bantam A's...six nights a week while they have kids playing peewee A's....for those with a six ounce piece of poop between their ears, does this resonate home why Edina is successful. I did hear from both why they did what they did. I've coached hockey for 10 years and based on what I heard, I have see nothing wrong with what they did. They discussed with refs numerous times their concern with how game was getting out of hand and they did what they felt was necessary based on their hockey sense....anyone who doesn't think the two coaches don't have the background and hockey knowledge to make the right call...don't know hockey. The comments of jealousy and envy smell on this thread...and I can't stand Edina but I respect these two's decision. GB
Toomuchtoosoon
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:46 pm

Post by Toomuchtoosoon »

GB-you did only hear one side of the story also. My concern about quitting in the middle of the game is the message that it sends to other teams that may try intimidating tactics once Edina gets the lead. I know the story also and do not feel it was the right thing to do. It could lead to more teams trying to take runs at the kids once they fall behind.

No one doubts their hockey knowledge and dedication to the game, just think this is not the right reaction to a difficult situation.

This makes Edina a bigger target than it already is. There is enough issues with the kids getting run at when the game gets out of hand, now it could get worse.
Mnhockeys
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:03 pm

Post by Mnhockeys »

Did this kind of things happen before, to Edina and/or other associations in MN? What triggered it and what the consequence was?
chief22
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:00 am

Post by chief22 »

He said the game didn't mean anything is why they quit, and they didn't want anyone to get hurt in a meaningless game. and yet they will have 30 scrimmages this year??? so if a 3rd place game doesn't matter, how do these punks get through a scrimmage? The game against Blaine was not out of control at all - each team had 2 penalty's up until Bellows crapped all over himself and his team. Bellows is a punk and so is the head coach. I know for a fact that most of players and parents didn't want to quit.
C-dad
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:47 pm

Post by C-dad »

chief22 wrote:He said the game didn't mean anything is why they quit, and they didn't want anyone to get hurt in a meaningless game. and yet they will have 30 scrimmages this year??? so if a 3rd place game doesn't matter, how do these punks get through a scrimmage? The game against Blaine was not out of control at all - each team had 2 penalty's up until Bellows crapped all over himself and his team. Bellows is a punk and so is the head coach. I know for a fact that most of players and parents didn't want to quit.
Care to share the results of your scientific survey of the parents and players with us? How did you manage to contact them all?
Let 'Em Play
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:32 am

Post by Let 'Em Play »

GoldenBear wrote:I love everyone's comments for those that weren't there or don't know what transpired. I have children that have competed against Edina teams the past six years coached by the two current Bantam A coaches...in the summer and in the winter. I speak for the majority in that I'd enjoy having both coach my kids. These are two guys that are donating their time to coach Bantam A's...six nights a week while they have kids playing peewee A's....for those with a six ounce piece of poop between their ears, does this resonate home why Edina is successful... I did hear from both why they did what they did. I've coached hockey for 10 years and based on what I heard, I have see nothing wrong with what they did. They discussed with refs numerous times their concern with how game was getting out of hand and they did what they felt was necessary based on their hockey sense....anyone who doesn't think the two coaches don't have the background and hockey knowledge to make the right call...don't know hockey. The comments of jealousy and envy smell on this thread...and I can't stand Edina but I respect these two's decision. GB
Puh-leez. Does it NOT resonate to you why at least one of these coaches is REALLY "donating his time to coach Bantam A's while his kid plays peewee A's?" Seriously. This is a coach who blew a gasket when his kid did not make the SQA team his first year eligible. How better to get him on the Bantam A team next season than to already have one year of coaching said team under your belt.
Pinky
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:54 pm

Post by Pinky »

Yada yada yada.....this post is boring and going no-where.
C-dad
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:47 pm

Post by C-dad »

Let 'Em Play wrote:
GoldenBear wrote:I love everyone's comments for those that weren't there or don't know what transpired. I have children that have competed against Edina teams the past six years coached by the two current Bantam A coaches...in the summer and in the winter. I speak for the majority in that I'd enjoy having both coach my kids. These are two guys that are donating their time to coach Bantam A's...six nights a week while they have kids playing peewee A's....for those with a six ounce piece of poop between their ears, does this resonate home why Edina is successful... I did hear from both why they did what they did. I've coached hockey for 10 years and based on what I heard, I have see nothing wrong with what they did. They discussed with refs numerous times their concern with how game was getting out of hand and they did what they felt was necessary based on their hockey sense....anyone who doesn't think the two coaches don't have the background and hockey knowledge to make the right call...don't know hockey. The comments of jealousy and envy smell on this thread...and I can't stand Edina but I respect these two's decision. GB
Puh-leez. Does it NOT resonate to you why at least one of these coaches is REALLY "donating his time to coach Bantam A's while his kid plays peewee A's?" Seriously. This is a coach who blew a gasket when his kid did not make the SQA team his first year eligible. How better to get him on the Bantam A team next season than to already have one year of coaching said team under your belt.
Two years actually as they coached Bantam As last year too. If you watch his kid play you'd understand that it is no longer an issue. His kid is going to be on the A teams regardless of who is coaching. Kid is huge for his age and very skilled. He was dominant as a first year PWA. But I'm not denying that they both set themselves up to coach their kids as Bantams as I'm sure that was the thought when they went after coaching that team.
supertacks
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:11 pm

Post by supertacks »

Pinky wrote:Yada yada yada.....this post is boring and going no-where.
totally agree... There obviously has been a gag order of some sort issued across Edina parents and it appears Roseau, as we have not heard from watchdog, Ram Hockey, or other folks up there that obviously know the whole story. It's a small town for crying out loud, I'm sure everyone knows EXACTLY what happened.
centennialhockey
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:10 pm

Post by centennialhockey »

I have to laugh as it seems personel now. It is pretty clear everything is political and has an agenda for these coaches. Welcome to the world of youth hockey.
Milk Carton Matty #6
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:21 pm

Post by Milk Carton Matty #6 »

greybeard58 wrote:A few years ago the Edina A Bantam team left their 2nd place State Tournament trophy in the locker room at New Hope.
They were just upset that they blew a 3 goal lead with the super team and lost 5-3 to Centennial
OGEE OGELTHORPE
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: State of shock/without the awe

Post by OGEE OGELTHORPE »

supertacks wrote:
Pinky wrote:Yada yada yada.....this post is boring and going no-where.
totally agree... There obviously has been a gag order of some sort issued across Edina parents and it appears Roseau, as we have not heard from watchdog, Ram Hockey, or other folks up there that obviously know the whole story. It's a small town for crying out loud, I'm sure everyone knows EXACTLY what happened.
Edina quit, who cares.....end of story.
Locked