Third shooters ... SCORES and stoned ...WhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:Edina 1, Fire 0
Edina 1, Fire 1
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Hornets win in shootout 4-3. A great finish to a great Tournament.WhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:Hornets Win! Hornets Win!
Agree with that statement. I called Edina to win this vs Wayzata. Surprised it went to a SO with those guys. Edina has some awesome firepower.WhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:Difficult to imagine this younger and smaller Fire team withstanding this type of sustained pressure from these older, bigger, stronger and elite 96 Hornet players ... it looks like men versus boys right nowWhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:Edina is really puring it on
I wouldn't be so up in arms and make excuses for the poor 97's Most if not all of the fire are second year Peewees so they should be good. If we could go anywhere and approach kids to play for our association we would and should win every tourney we were in. I love the competition and would like to play them, however I agree that we should not let a AAA team into association hockey tourneys. There is enough competition out there that we don't need AAA invading winter hockey.hockeyoldtimer wrote:Yeah, yeah of course Edina wins again even though it was a nail biter. Once again we get to see the power of the Hornets. Too bad for the young 97 Fire as I hear they had a much harder road. They had to fight by a scrappy Lakeville South team to win 5-2, Battle past Wayzata and their "six foot goaltender" to a 7-1 victory, and play a very talented, hard-hitting Woodbury team to a 6-2 victory all before playing the Hornets to a 4-3 shoot out loss. Granted the Edina 11-TRF 0, Edina 7 -Fargo O, Edina 10 EGF-1 must have been very trying on their arms from all the arm pumping but otherwise they probably didn't even break a sweat . OMG played them to a close 3-2 game but that was it. Of course they won, did you expect anything different?
My Kudos to the Fire, I wasn't there but were told they played like a team, passed the puck and had very solid goaltending and they are all 97's. I know all of us in association hockey want to hate the Fire but my kid is friends with one of them on the team. They are a bunch of nice kids from small assiciations who just want a chance to play good hockey.
They got their chance this weekend and did very well. Hats off to them.
Dont have a dog in this fight but its funny how you give rightly give Fire credit for 6-2 and 7-1 wins but discredit Edina's 7-0 win and a 11-0 win over a team that beat them couple days earlier and a win over a EGF team you picked as a dark horse and won their pool. Seems your a little bitter.hockeyoldtimer wrote:Yeah, yeah of course Edina wins again even though it was a nail biter. Once again we get to see the power of the Hornets. Too bad for the young 97 Fire as I hear they had a much harder road. They had to fight by a scrappy Lakeville South team to win 5-2, Battle past Wayzata and their "six foot goaltender" to a 7-1 victory, and play a very talented, hard-hitting Woodbury team to a 6-2 victory all before playing the Hornets to a 4-3 shoot out loss. Granted the Edina 11-TRF 0, Edina 7 -Fargo O, Edina 10 EGF-1 must have been very trying on their arms from all the arm pumping but otherwise they probably didn't even break a sweat . OMG played them to a close 3-2 game but that was it. Of course they won, did you expect anything different?
My Kudos to the Fire, I wasn't there but were told they played like a team, passed the puck and had very solid goaltending and they are all 97's. I know all of us in association hockey want to hate the Fire but my kid is friends with one of them on the team. They are a bunch of nice kids from small assiciations who just want a chance to play good hockey.
They got their chance this weekend and did very well. Hats off to them.
The dog has a great life and yes I poop on the carpet every once and a while.. After thinking about my statement I agree that we should play them.And let them play. I by no means are afraid of them, heck some of the kids play with my kid in the summer,,,but am worried that AAA might be the wave of the future in winter hockey.. I still think that the two class State Hockey tourney was bad too but still watch. If AAA takes over it will most likely be when my kids are grown and gone, I will probably make some $ off it which will be good.InigoMontoya wrote:I agree with dog's first statement, there's a good chance most of those kids are likely 2nd year peewees (no I don't have birth certificates in front of me), and any late 97s would be no different than the 1st year peewees that made the association A teams.
I disagree with dog's assessment that we should seal the borders (or boarders for those on the thread the last time) to out-of-state (or country) teams. Let 'em come, let's beat them, and let them go on their way to win tournaments around the country. If you don't want to play them, then don't.
Consider it Northern Wisconsin...O-townClown wrote:Did I read this correctly? The FIRE have a Canadian kid? Why?
Cause they can.O-townClown wrote:Did I read this correctly? The FIRE have a Canadian kid? Why?
We all know what they don't have - Wisconsin Kids!O-townClown wrote:Did I read this correctly? The FIRE have a Canadian kid? Why?
They are from Canada ... live here now.Wisconsinguy wrote:We all know what they don't have - Wisconsin Kids!O-townClown wrote:Did I read this correctly? The FIRE have a Canadian kid? Why?
There is a fair amount of 1st year peewee's on this squad and even the many of second years have April-June birthdays that would put them nearly a full year behind the top end association 96ers (July-October 96 kids).InigoMontoya wrote:I agree with dog's first statement, there's a good chance most of those kids are likely 2nd year peewees (no I don't have birth certificates in front of me), and any late 97s would be no different than the 1st year peewees that made the association A teams.
I would not throw your hat in the air too high. Looking at the scores over the weekend, why would you beat a team 25-0 and think that it is good hockey? Oh by the why, there are a few players on the Fire that are from very large associations.hockeyoldtimer wrote:Yeah, yeah of course Edina wins again even though it was a nail biter. Once again we get to see the power of the Hornets. Too bad for the young 97 Fire as I hear they had a much harder road. They had to fight by a scrappy Lakeville South team to win 5-2, Battle past Wayzata and their "six foot goaltender" to a 7-1 victory, and play a very talented, hard-hitting Woodbury team to a 6-2 victory all before playing the Hornets to a 4-3 shoot out loss. Granted the Edina 11-TRF 0, Edina 7 -Fargo O, Edina 10 EGF-1 must have been very trying on their arms from all the arm pumping but otherwise they probably didn't even break a sweat . OMG played them to a close 3-2 game but that was it. Of course they won, did you expect anything different?
My Kudos to the Fire, I wasn't there but were told they played like a team, passed the puck and had very solid goaltending and they are all 97's. I know all of us in association hockey want to hate the Fire but my kid is friends with one of them on the team. They are a bunch of nice kids from small assiciations who just want a chance to play good hockey.
They got their chance this weekend and did very well. Hats off to them.
Carefull what you are spoutin. the Bantam minor teams would have very few 97s on them. In our association thereare only 4 96ers on the team two of them goalies...Majority of the kids are 97s and we have three first year kids two 98's. And once again you GET TO PICK the kids that can even try out!!!! I don't feel sorry for you one bit and here we go making excuses on why THEY have a disadvantage?WhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:There is a fair amount of 1st year peewee's on this squad and even the many of second years have April-June birthdays that would put them nearly a full year behind the top end association 96ers (July-October 96 kids).InigoMontoya wrote:I agree with dog's first statement, there's a good chance most of those kids are likely 2nd year peewees (no I don't have birth certificates in front of me), and any late 97s would be no different than the 1st year peewees that made the association A teams.
Any time they play the Minnesota Pee Wee A teams it is the euivalent of playing Bantam Minor teams in states (and countries) other than Minnesota (and it's Dakota sub-urbs). Big size and strength disparities in addition to age. The boys (and girl on this team) are handling it better as the season progresses.
You are a shameless self promoter of your child. Move back to Canada.WhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:The Canadian kid just scored ... wears the number of his idol ... 99. The kid has the hardest shot of any pee wee kid i have seen south of the Canadian border ... fills the net ... tough in the corners and in the slot ... good playerWhosPuckIsItAnyways? wrote:A young defenseman from Northfield has given the Fire the lead. Great kid. Great hockey family ... rich history (St. Olaf's) ... his grandpa (in his 70's) still plays
Second Period .... Fire 2, Hornets 0
Who do you think your fooling? The 97 Fire have kids from small and large associations (including Edina) who are not happy with their kids development within their associations. These kids tried out for the team and are essentially a multi-association all-star team. Most would make their associations PW A team.hockeyoldtimer wrote:Yeah, yeah of course Edina wins again even though it was a nail biter. Once again we get to see the power of the Hornets. Too bad for the young 97 Fire as I hear they had a much harder road. They had to fight by a scrappy Lakeville South team to win 5-2, Battle past Wayzata and their "six foot goaltender" to a 7-1 victory, and play a very talented, hard-hitting Woodbury team to a 6-2 victory all before playing the Hornets to a 4-3 shoot out loss. Granted the Edina 11-TRF 0, Edina 7 -Fargo O, Edina 10 EGF-1 must have been very trying on their arms from all the arm pumping but otherwise they probably didn't even break a sweat . OMG played them to a close 3-2 game but that was it. Of course they won, did you expect anything different?
My Kudos to the Fire, I wasn't there but were told they played like a team, passed the puck and had very solid goaltending and they are all 97's. I know all of us in association hockey want to hate the Fire but my kid is friends with one of them on the team. They are a bunch of nice kids from small assiciations who just want a chance to play good hockey.
They got their chance this weekend and did very well. Hats off to them.