#5 A Mahtomedi at Tartan Thursday Jan. 14th

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:22 pm

Mahtomedi is playing well at the moment and tartan coming off a upsetting loss to South St Paul. Rivalry game, and both teams always play each other tough..who takes this one?

my prediction:

mahtomedi-3

tartan-1

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:14 pm

Score anyone?

Post by **east hockey** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:15 pm

Zephyrs won 6-2.

Lee

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:19 pm

Yikes. I thought this one would be a lot closer. Any one got the box score? Shots?

Post by **east hockey** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:20 pm

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/show/19 ... ason=16427

Lee

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:23 pm

Tartan our shot mahtomedi and lost 6-2?? Goaltending has always been an issue for tartan

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:24 pm

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:25 pm

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:25 pm

Looks like Tartan went with the backup goalie Loibl. It it appears that may have only been his second game.. Where was Gierke?

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:27 am

Well seeing his previous games his numbers haven't really been outstanding..your goalie need to give you a chance to win the game, looks like tartan coaching staff wanted to try something else out. But it looks like wohlers had a hell of a game at the other end of the ice, being out shot and winning by 4, that's giving your team a chance to win

RushnCircles · Post by **RushnCircles** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 1:24 pm

Was Mahtomedi outshot by tartan ? the way i read it, shots were 31 - 30 maht.

Buck50 · Post by **Buck50** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:50 pm

Mahtomedi was outshot and thanks to their goalie Wohlers they were still in it after 1. It could have easily have been 4-1 Tartan after 1.
The first period was all Tartan....after that, Mahtomedi took over and any chances Tartan had later in the game were snubbed by Wohlers along with Mahtomedi being pretty tough in tight around their net.

Tartans goalie on the other hand let in a short sider, a shot that was semi-fanned on by Marshall, and 2 rebounds that never should have been where they were and easly put home.

ilivegreen60 · Post by **ilivegreen60** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:34 pm

RushnCircles wrote:Was Mahtomedi outshot by tartan ? the way i read it, shots were 31 - 30 maht.

sorry, i read saves not shots

pucknutz · Post by **pucknutz** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:05 pm

ilivegreen60 wrote:Tartan our shot mahtomedi and lost 6-2?? Goaltending has always been an issue for tartan

Tartan looked like they were gonna run away with this one in the first period. Then a couple of goals and Tartan folded up its tent. For a team that after last season was supposed to have returning goaltending and all sorts of third year senior talent this year, what has happened? No leadership is evident, obvious selfishness with the puck and with no apparent consequence for being selfish. Players out on the ice for long shifts then too gassed to get back up the ice, or they don't care too. This team has no discipline and appears that they don't care. They've given up far too many soft goals this year and they can't pass the puck or play their positions. They are all over the ice like a Squirt team. Sad to see, this was supposed to be that Bantam A team that was going to be so good. Sorry to say it but they don't seem interested. I don't understand it at all.