Bantam B1 scores
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:48 am
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:48 am
Re: Chisago Lakes Vs. Forest Lake
I don't believe that any association that doesn't run an A team should be able to have their B1 team ranked. If Chisago is running an A Bantam team, then forgive me, but I don't think they do.xxMNSNIPExx wrote: Refs gave Forest Lake a few goals. Chisago should be ranked.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:47 pm
Re: Chisago Lakes Vs. Forest Lake
Wasnt that the case last year with Sauk Rapids- no A team and ended up winning state? The previous year, Blake had no A team and won state?muckandgrind wrote:I don't believe that any association that doesn't run an A team should be able to have their B1 team ranked. If Chisago is running an A Bantam team, then forgive me, but I don't think they do.xxMNSNIPExx wrote: Refs gave Forest Lake a few goals. Chisago should be ranked.
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:48 am
Re: Chisago Lakes Vs. Forest Lake
I think you're right...but I still don't like it. There's an element of "sandbagging" going on, IMO. Most of these associations have A-level players on these B1 teams, so I find it hard to pad them on the back for beating teams that don't have any A-level players on them.hockey relic wrote:Wasnt that the case last year with Sauk Rapids- no A team and ended up winning state? The previous year, Blake had no A team and won state?muckandgrind wrote:I don't believe that any association that doesn't run an A team should be able to have their B1 team ranked. If Chisago is running an A Bantam team, then forgive me, but I don't think they do.xxMNSNIPExx wrote: Refs gave Forest Lake a few goals. Chisago should be ranked.
I completely get the dilemna of the small association, heck, I belong to one. If we didn't field A teams, we would also be pretty d@mn good at the B1 level. But our philosophy is that having your best players play B hockey (especially at the Bantam level) doesn't help prepare them for competing at the high school level. Just my opinion.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:04 pm
Re: Chisago Lakes Vs. Forest Lake
That is going to be Chisago this year.hockey relic wrote:Wasnt that the case last year with Sauk Rapids- no A team and ended up winning state? The previous year, Blake had no A team and won state?muckandgrind wrote:I don't believe that any association that doesn't run an A team should be able to have their B1 team ranked. If Chisago is running an A Bantam team, then forgive me, but I don't think they do.xxMNSNIPExx wrote: Refs gave Forest Lake a few goals. Chisago should be ranked.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:57 pm
Re: Chisago Lakes Vs. Forest Lake
East won it last yearhockey relic wrote:Wasnt that the case last year with Sauk Rapids- no A team and ended up winning state? The previous year, Blake had no A team and won state?muckandgrind wrote:I don't believe that any association that doesn't run an A team should be able to have their B1 team ranked. If Chisago is running an A Bantam team, then forgive me, but I don't think they do.xxMNSNIPExx wrote: Refs gave Forest Lake a few goals. Chisago should be ranked.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:29 am
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:56 pm
Elk River = 2smalltownhockey21 wrote:Anyone have the score for the Centennial Red Vs Elk River game last night?
Centennial = 2
Very good game to watch elk rivers goals were both pp goals. Both teams had good speed. Centennial goalie played well Elk river out shot centennial a bit 26-21 or something close to that.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:18 pm
I watched this game, along with the game that followed between Eagan Green and Farmington.slapper5 wrote:Lakeville North beat #13 Eagan 6-1 shots in favor of North 30-8
Lakeville North had good size. Eagan blue is filled with skaters, but are quite small, so Lakeville's physical play took them out of the game.
Eagan Green outplayed Farmington far more than the 4-2 score. I susect shots were in the 30-10 in favor of Eagan. It was difficult to tell how good they are based on this game, but they are posting some decent wins in scimmages. Eagan Green doesn't have any huge kids, but they seem to play fairly physical, and move the puck well.
The upcoming tournaments will be the proving ground for all of these teams.... But Lakeville North looks very impressive. I think they will be in the mix!
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:29 am
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:56 pm
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:29 am
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:48 am
[quote="ontheglass"][quote="slapper5"]Lakeville North beat #13 Eagan 6-1 shots in favor of North 30-8[/quote]
I watched this game, along with the game that followed between Eagan Green and Farmington.
Lakeville North had good size. Eagan blue is filled with skaters, but are quite small, so Lakeville's physical play took them out of the game.
Eagan Green outplayed Farmington far more than the 4-2 score. I susect shots were in the 30-10 in favor of Eagan. It was difficult to tell how good they are based on this game, but they are posting some decent wins in scimmages. Eagan Green doesn't have any huge kids, but they seem to play fairly physical, and move the puck well.
The upcoming tournaments will be the proving ground for all of these teams.... But Lakeville North looks very impressive. I think they will be in the mix![/quote]
ya the Lakeville North team has good size which creates them to play physical. The one line with i think it was 7-5-2 looked outsanding
I watched this game, along with the game that followed between Eagan Green and Farmington.
Lakeville North had good size. Eagan blue is filled with skaters, but are quite small, so Lakeville's physical play took them out of the game.
Eagan Green outplayed Farmington far more than the 4-2 score. I susect shots were in the 30-10 in favor of Eagan. It was difficult to tell how good they are based on this game, but they are posting some decent wins in scimmages. Eagan Green doesn't have any huge kids, but they seem to play fairly physical, and move the puck well.
The upcoming tournaments will be the proving ground for all of these teams.... But Lakeville North looks very impressive. I think they will be in the mix![/quote]
ya the Lakeville North team has good size which creates them to play physical. The one line with i think it was 7-5-2 looked outsanding
D6 action last night.
EP 2
Prior lake 0
It was 1-0 with 2 seconds left and EP got a open net. It was a total domination for the EP team but couldn't score....
EP out shot them 55-3.
The 2nd period alone was 20-0 for shots The goalie for PL played incredible...looked like the game of his life. If he didn't make the saves - it could have easily been 10-0.
Not sure if I am happier for my EP team or the PL goalie..!
EP 2
Prior lake 0
It was 1-0 with 2 seconds left and EP got a open net. It was a total domination for the EP team but couldn't score....
EP out shot them 55-3.
The 2nd period alone was 20-0 for shots The goalie for PL played incredible...looked like the game of his life. If he didn't make the saves - it could have easily been 10-0.
Not sure if I am happier for my EP team or the PL goalie..!
