North American Hockey Classic Tournament Scores

hockey_is_a_choice · Post by **hockey_is_a_choice** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:57 pm

http://www.northamericanhockeyclassic.com/

EnjoyTheShow · Post by **EnjoyTheShow** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:50 am

Is that the MN monopoly that is 3 and 0 at the 01' level? The 99 team has also been competitive in 3 games? I can't believe that is the MN team. I know the 00' open team is all 01's and 02's but there is no way they could hang at that level. Maybe i'm just ignorant, but that seems like quite a stretch....

hmmmmmm · Post by **hmmmmmm** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:29 pm

The 96 & 97 Machine teams did NOT get into the playoffs of this tourney!

HMMMMMM....

dingle · Post by **dingle** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:42 pm

It looks like the machine had duece players on the team, according to the rosters online. At the 96 level.

iwearmysunglassesatnight · Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:37 am

[quote="dingle"]It looks like the machine had duece players on the team, according to the rosters online. At the 96 level.[/quote]

why dings? did they add them ? i thought it was hockey or bust.

boardmember · Post by **boardmember** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:11 pm

hmmmmmm wrote:The 96 & 97 Machine teams did NOT get into the playoffs of this tourney!

HMMMMMM....

Nice first post!

Mn teams at the AAA Subway Classic

2001
MN Made (3-1) in the Championship
MN Monolopy ( 3-1) Playing for 3rd

2000
Machine ( 4-1) in the Championship game

1999
Machine (3-1) In Championship Game
MN Monolopy ( 2-3) Won Consolation game

1999 Open
Icemen (1-3-1)

1998
Machine ( 5-0) in the Championship Game
Blades (4-1) In the 3rd place game
Icemen (2-3)

1997
Blades (3-3) Playing in 3rd place game
Machine (2-3)
Icemen (1-4)

1997 open
97 MLH (2-2) playing in 3rd place game

1996
Machine (2-2-1)
MN Legacy ( MLH) (1-4)

This tournament is one of top AAA events in North America. Teams from MN have/are doing very well. If you know any of players on these teams they deserve a pat on the back for all their efforts.

At the older levels 97,96,95 the Canadian teams that are put together for this event are very good, very big, very skilled and very strong! Its a whole different game/level for the MN players! There are 1-2 teams at each level that are heads and shoulders above the rest.

Because of checking and the physical play at these older levels there are injuries. The rosters of many of the older MN teams have new players on them to fill holes from players not able to make the trip...

rock head · Post by **rock head** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:58 pm

[quote="hmmmmmm"]The 96 & 97 Machine teams did NOT get into the playoffs of this tourney!

HMMMMMM....[/quote]

The 97 Machine teams are way to small, The stars from the 97 team from the last 3 years have seen their best days. The new players on the 97 Machine team are NO help at all, and the 97 Deuce players that are playing are the kids of the 97 Deuce coaches, just to keep Bernie's word to the to keep the coaches happy!!!! I fell bad for the full time players that have to go through this mess.

ankur25 · Post by **ankur25** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:59 pm

Cut the 97's some slack...the Viper team the Blades lost to is basically the same team they lost to in the brick finals with the addition of the best kid off the Boston Jr Bruins (Jeremy Bracco) the best kid off the LA Selects (Ty Comrie), and 3 kids from Toronto...

Sneakyfast99 · Post by **Sneakyfast99** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:15 pm

What happened to Bernie's "beloved" '96 Machine Team at the Subway Classic? They did not make it to the medal round on Sunday...unheard of??!!

iwearmysunglassesatnight · Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:22 pm

[quote="Sneakyfast99"]What happened to Bernie's "beloved" '96 Machine Team at the Subway Classic? They did not make it to the medal round on Sunday...unheard of??!![/quote]

umm... their small?

dogeatdog1 · Post by **dogeatdog1** » Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:23 pm

iwearmysunglassesatnight wrote:
Sneakyfast99 wrote:What happened to Bernie's "beloved" '96 Machine Team at the Subway Classic? They did not make it to the medal round on Sunday...unheard of??!!
umm... their small?

I know that the 97s are small I didn't think the 96's are that small are they?

hockeychick · Post by **hockeychick** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:19 am

The 96 machine may have a couple smaller players, but they also have a couple good sized players and a bunch of average sized players, small size is not an excuse here.

muckandgrind · Post by **muckandgrind** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:27 pm

Sneakyfast99 wrote:What happened to Bernie's "beloved" '96 Machine Team at the Subway Classic? They did not make it to the medal round on Sunday...unheard of??!!

A few of their top players have quit over the past year.

Sneakyfast99 · Post by **Sneakyfast99** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:53 pm

One player left and several were "released"!

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com