Select 17s

schwartz · Post by **schwartz** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:25 am

moostard2 wrote:My point is one made it and the other didn't...my other point is look at the point difference...

Don't get all firm on me mooseturd, just looking for clarification on your vague and somewhat random posting.

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:30 am

Doglover wrote:Flatonice - checked the Adv 16 roster for 2A/2AA and either I missed something, or the coaches don't have a kid on the team??? Not saying there aren't politics in this whole deal - everyone knows there is - but I missed this one. Couple kids missing from this roster that I expected, but didn't see any coaches' kids - sorry should have put this on Adv 16 thread I guess though.

When you show up to the rink, it will all make sense to you. One kid on your team just got added. He wont be hard to pick out. He is a coaches kid. Maybe not your coaches kid...

Marty McSorely · Post by **Marty McSorely** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:31 pm

itsjusthockey.....Have you watched any of the Rochester teams? Mayo....all there good players are too old for 17's...only one even tried out. JM....well they don't have anyone that is good! Century they have two kids Rashler and Faupal, most would say Rashler is the better of the two.

Give Souix Fan a break.....40-60 kids in three hours... the system is flawed not he coaching. There should be 3 groups of 20 kids to get on honest look.

moostard2 · Post by **moostard2** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 4:41 pm

schwartz wrote:
moostard2 wrote:My point is one made it and the other didn't...my other point is look at the point difference...

Don't get all firm on me mooseturd, just looking for clarification on your vague and somewhat random posting.

Ill get firm with whomever I feel like getting firm or flaccid with....

Jbone · Post by **Jbone** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:20 pm

moostard2 wrote:
schwartz wrote:
moostard2 wrote:My point is one made it and the other didn't...my other point is look at the point difference...

Don't get all firm on me mooseturd, just looking for clarification on your vague and somewhat random posting.
Ill get firm with whomever I feel like getting firm or flaccid with....

I don't think Moos was getting firm on anybody... Not a bad post in my mind either. However, Siouxfan looks for gamers and players that are willing to skate till they are blue in the face. Will beats skill when it counts. Not sure if Grubb is that type of player or not.

hockeyfever44 · Post by **hockeyfever44** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:29 pm

itsjusthockey wrote:I'm surprised that some people try to defend the Section 1 Advanced 17 tryouts, the coaches hate Rochester kids, that's why all the Mayo, JM and all but 1 non-Lourdes kids got cut, most only had two days to show what they could do, the coaching staff was Lourdes dominated / biased. I'm shocked Matt Roth got cut (was the only Lourdes player to get cut) and Conner played for Sioux Fan last year so he was a lock as the only Rochester public school kid to make the team. This entire process is a joke with the people they have making decisions. I'm glad to see people are starting to figure it out and changed the elite II coaching staff, it can only help improve the chances for a fair evaluation of all kids that the former coaches would cut. Hockey in Section 1 continues to be controlled by people with their own agenda, another example is the Great 8 and no Century kids, I'm surprised the 1 AA champs didn't have any good seniors, I'm also shocked that the Mayo kids made it which they diserved so we know the Advanced 17 staff didn't pick the team or it would have been every Lourdes kids

Don't forget that Whitney (the AD and the "real" headcoach for Mayo) is the one that counted the votes for Great 8. Any Century kid that might have been on the list to make (Tyler Anderson who should have clearly made it) would have been cut because of Century taking Whitney's kids chance to go to state away.

rudy · Post by **rudy** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:08 pm

Can someone post here the tournament schedule for the rest of this weekend?

schwartz · Post by **schwartz** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:28 pm

moostard2 wrote:
schwartz wrote:
moostard2 wrote:My point is one made it and the other didn't...my other point is look at the point difference...

Don't get all firm on me mooseturd, just looking for clarification on your vague and somewhat random posting.
Ill get firm with whomever I feel like getting firm or flaccid with....

Easy killer! Flaccid? Put away the thesaurus.

crankshaft · Post by **crankshaft** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:14 am

In deffence of Sioux Fan the first two sessions each went an extra half hour longer so each kid got a four hour look. However thought there were one - two kids cut on Saturday that should be on the team, I personaly would have cut about 5 kids that made the team.

PuckTime · Post by **PuckTime** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:26 am

I am wondering how someone gets cut at tryouts, yet shows up and plays as an extra player??

MnPride2 · Post by **MnPride2** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:57 am

PuckTime wrote:I am wondering how someone gets cut at tryouts, yet shows up and plays as an extra player??

I`m wondering how a goalie can let in only 3 goals all weekend and not make it...

CasseauCougar · Post by **CasseauCougar** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:25 am

Sioux Fan wrote:We had 25 guys and the majority could have been here at least 3 more that all played Advanced 15's with us in District 4.

We will continue to try to get the best kids and be fair that is all we can do.

I do not see being involved with the kids and knowing them is bad thing.

See, in the case of the Blaine coach/dad, his player has never made even a Festival team. And as everyone else has gotten bigger, it's made his player being chosen even less likely. Unfortunately it will be very obvious how out of place the kid is this weekend. Shame on the other evaluators for supporting this dad. You would hope they would care a little more about the process. Maybe so long as their school's players get on on the team they turn a blind eye. 5A/AA has more to offer.

crankshaft · Post by **crankshaft** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:41 am

Any results from the games played?

Sioux Fan · Post by **Sioux Fan** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:08 am

Section 1 and Section 7 had an exciting game last night.

Aaron Dooley stopped all six shooters in a shoot out and Jason Clark and Dan Billiar scored to get Section 1 the Shoot out win 6-5..

A lot of very good players that played hard lots of fun.

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:18 am

MnPride2 wrote:
PuckTime wrote:I am wondering how someone gets cut at tryouts, yet shows up and plays as an extra player??

I`m wondering how a goalie can let in only 3 goals all weekend and not make it...

Politics!

davey · Post by **davey** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:50 am

Sioux Fan wrote:Section 1 and Section 7 had an exciting game last night.

Aaron Dooley stopped all six shooters in a shoot out and Jason Clark and Dan Billiar scored to get Section 1 the Shoot out win 6-5..

A lot of very good players that played hard lots of fun.

looks like you might have picked the right kids Sioux Fan. Who all scored for you

Sioux Fan · Post by **Sioux Fan** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:00 am

I believe the goal scorers were

Drew Weber
Travis Seuer
Dan Billiar
Darren Lapic
and one of the Clark Lafontaine Lapic line on a scramble in front.

May have been Clark or Lapic but I am not sure..

We could have done better if we did not turn 3 1 on 3's into great shots and goals for the Section 7 boys but they made the play.

Aaron Dooley was awesome in the shootout.

PuckTime · Post by **PuckTime** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:59 am

MrBoDangles wrote:
MnPride2 wrote:
PuckTime wrote:I am wondering how someone gets cut at tryouts, yet shows up and plays as an extra player??

I`m wondering how a goalie can let in only 3 goals all weekend and not make it...
Politics!

So, is it politics or whining that got him in?? Sorry, but either way, it's messed up. You don't make it, you're out. No exceptions.

tuffpucker · Post by **tuffpucker** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:20 pm

I watched the kid from Blaine play. I thought he played very well and was one of the better defensemen on the team.

CasseauCougar · Post by **CasseauCougar** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:14 pm

Doesn't say much for Pitts, Windle, and Stern, all of which went on to New York last year with the 16s. I have a feeling they will all move on and others won't.

GreenisGood · Post by **GreenisGood** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:27 pm

I had a chance to go to the section 6 vs STA(section?) game today, one of the best select games i have ever seen
Patterson, Gardiner, Rau, that line is unstoppable
they out played the other teams top line of Isackson, Crandall, Gavin
A good batch of 17's this year

gopher1 · Post by **gopher1** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:45 pm

Sioux Fan wrote:I believe the goal scorers were

Drew Weber
Travis Seuer
Dan Billiar
Darren Lapic
and one of the Clark Lafontaine Lapic line on a scramble in front.

May have been Clark or Lapic but I am not sure..

We could have done better if we did not turn 3 1 on 3's into great shots and goals for the Section 7 boys but they made the play.

Aaron Dooley was awesome in the shootout.

You believe? Your the coach, you should know who scored.

Sioux Fan · Post by **Sioux Fan** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:20 am

Gopher 1 they do not announce it it was 100 ft away and several guys had a swipe at it and it went in ...

No one keeps a scoresheet so I do not want to credit anyone out of the scrum without knowing.

Fire and Ice · Post by **Fire and Ice** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:35 am

5A 5 AA

ZERO GOALS IN 2 GAMES.

SAY WHAT YOU WILL ABOUT BEING OUT OF PLACE. PERFECT IS PERFECT.

DO YOU HAVE A BETTER SUGGESTION?

gretzguy · Post by **gretzguy** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:56 am

Not that much of a surprise.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Select 17s

Re: my point

Re: my point

Re: my point

Re: Section 1

selects

Re: my point

Section 1 6 Section 7 5

Re: Section 1 6 Section 7 5