March 4th Scores

Post by **karl(east)** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:26 pm

Wow. The agony drags on in WBL.

The51 · Post by **The51** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:27 pm

how was the goal scored?

mnpuckster · Post by **mnpuckster** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:28 pm

wb can never win......ever

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:28 pm

Only consolation with this win is that there will be a private school playing in the AA tourney

sddave · Post by **sddave** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:29 pm

Wow. Another HM/WB classic, just not in the section final this year. Good luck at State Pioneers.

If it is any consolation, at least WB can't lose on Thursday at the Civic/Xcel again (pun definitely intended).

TheNightman · Post by **TheNightman** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:29 pm

Bahe from who else but Zepeda, as Collette lets in a softy from what I heard. Owen's disappointing career in White Bear has a fitting end

starmvp · Post by **starmvp** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:29 pm

Final:
Hill- 5
WBL- 4 OT

eagle4life9 · Post by **eagle4life9** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:31 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:Only consolation with this win is that there will be a private school playing in the AA tourney

Not unless the Ponies have anything to say about it. Besides, if there wasnt a private school there, who would we all cheer against?

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:31 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:Only consolation with this win is that there will be a private school playing in the AA tourney

Wake up. This was a semifinal game. There not in the tournament yet.

sddave · Post by **sddave** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:32 pm

Great point eagle4life9, Let me hope the pioneers overlook the ponies as i just did

mnpuckster · Post by **mnpuckster** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:33 pm

Wow, WB seems to outplay Hill again, and find a way to lose again. Owen Collette senior year cannot end worse. he needs that one

TheNightman · Post by **TheNightman** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:35 pm

Does anyone have the final shots? White Bear must have almost doubled Hill's total

sddave · Post by **sddave** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:41 pm

TheNightman wrote:Goal by White Bear disallowed with 2.5 seconds to go, the net was off

So can anyone that was at the game tell me if the "no-goal" was legit? was the net dislodged?

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:51 pm

wbmd, I'm fully aware. You really think the Ponies can handle the Pioneers? I'd love to see Hill lose and have the Ponies make it but I doubt that'll be happening.

The51 · Post by **The51** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:06 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:wbmd, I'm fully aware. You really think the Ponies can handle the Pioneers? I'd love to see Hill lose and have the Ponies make it but I doubt that'll be happening.

Stillwater handled benilde 6-2 who beat Hill so its possible

slapshotmn · Post by **slapshotmn** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:15 pm

sddave wrote:
TheNightman wrote:Goal by White Bear disallowed with 2.5 seconds to go, the net was off
So can anyone that was at the game tell me if the "no-goal" was legit? was the net dislodged?

I was even with the goalline in perfect view of the play. In my estimation (no bias - I only went there to watch a good game tonight), it was a GOOD GOAL. My two reasons are: 1) No whistle blew. In all of my hockey days, you keep playing until you hear a whistle and if the net was off, which it was, the whistle should have been blown. 2) The net came off the mouring from the bottom and behind the goal, so, the front of the net was essentially intact. From what I saw: The puck was delivered out front, the WBL player had the puck on his stick, the back/bottom of the net lifted up and started to dislodge forward a split second before the shot occurred, and then the goal scored as the net was indeed off.

The status of the net had nothing to contribute to the goal. No whistle had scored. In my estimation, and again, I was one of only a few hundred people that saw it from the goal line view, it should have been a GOOD GOAL, with 2.5 seconds remaining.

heybuddy · Post by **heybuddy** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:20 pm

The51 wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:wbmd, I'm fully aware. You really think the Ponies can handle the Pioneers? I'd love to see Hill lose and have the Ponies make it but I doubt that'll be happening.
Stillwater handled benilde 6-2 who beat Hill so its possible

What happened two years ago in the section final with Woodbury and Cretin? Oh the team who didn't win either of the regular season games won the game. Also don't forget the fact that everyone looked past Woodbury. Not to mention Cretin is a private school and it just so happens hill is as well.

So everyone watch out. Don't look past Stillwater in any way. Anything can happen in the section final. Although I will say if Zepeda is dominating as much as some of you are saying then Hill has a lot going for them. The hardest thing is to stop a a player in the playoffs that just seems to be everywhere on the ice. It's just like riding a hot goalie in the playoffs.

cody53193 · Post by **cody53193** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:24 pm

I was also at this game and was angled right behind the end where white bear SCORED with 2.5 seconds left. The puck was in the back of the net and the red light was on then the whistle came. The net was clearly intact in front and it should have been a goal.

HockeyMN1 · Post by **HockeyMN1** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:27 pm

Anything on LF Alexandria?

dontcallmeshirley · Post by **dontcallmeshirley** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:32 pm

i heard it was

0-0 17:00 first period

shots

0 LF

0 Alexandria

minnesotaice · Post by **minnesotaice** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:35 pm

Todays winners:
Stillwater
Virginia
St Cloud Cathedral
Moorhead
Hill-Murray

HockeyMN1 · Post by **HockeyMN1** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:37 pm

dontcallmeshirley wrote:i heard it was

0-0 17:00 first period

shots

0 LF

0 Alexandria

Ok very funny shirley, the thread said it was today so I thought it was.

SPUDHOCKEY · Post by **SPUDHOCKEY** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:03 am

lol

They play tomorrow

sddave · Post by **sddave** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:41 am

slapshotmn wrote:
sddave wrote:
TheNightman wrote:Goal by White Bear disallowed with 2.5 seconds to go, the net was off
So can anyone that was at the game tell me if the "no-goal" was legit? was the net dislodged?
I was even with the goalline in perfect view of the play. In my estimation (no bias - I only went there to watch a good game tonight), it was a GOOD GOAL. My two reasons are: 1) No whistle blew. In all of my hockey days, you keep playing until you hear a whistle and if the net was off, which it was, the whistle should have been blown. 2) The net came off the mouring from the bottom and behind the goal, so, the front of the net was essentially intact. From what I saw: The puck was delivered out front, the WBL player had the puck on his stick, the back/bottom of the net lifted up and started to dislodge forward a split second before the shot occurred, and then the goal scored as the net was indeed off.

The status of the net had nothing to contribute to the goal. No whistle had scored. In my estimation, and again, I was one of only a few hundred people that saw it from the goal line view, it should have been a GOOD GOAL, with 2.5 seconds remaining.

Thanks. Just curious what some people who were lucky enough to be there thought. Doesn't really matter now, i guess, but man WB just doesn't get the breaks. Of course, if that goal stands we have *questions* coming from the other side about why it was not disallowed. Hope i don't sound too sour, not my point, just wondering what some first hand viewers saw.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

March 4th Scores

Disallowed goal...

Re: Disallowed goal...