3AA #4 Apple Valley vs. #1 Woodbury Feb. 28th

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Who goes to the finals?

Poll ended at Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:02 pm

Apple Valley
4
31%
Woodbury
9
69%
 
Total votes: 13

wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

3AA #4 Apple Valley vs. #1 Woodbury Feb. 28th

Post by wbmd »

Predictions and comments.

Starting time is 6:00 at the Fairgrounds Coliseum.
Last edited by wbmd on Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
joycer10
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:28 pm

Post by joycer10 »

Woodbury:4
Apple Valley:2 (EN)

Woodbury knows they have to play better then they did against Rosemount tonight. But the Royals bounced back after a rough game against Roseville earlier this year to beat White Bear so I think They'll pull off a the win.
pioneerhockey12
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:13 pm

Post by pioneerhockey12 »

AV-5
woodbury-2
TooManyEagles
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:09 pm

Post by TooManyEagles »

AV 4
Woodbury 3
iwearmysunglassesatnight
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:07 pm

Post by iwearmysunglassesatnight »

AV 6
WOODBURY 1
Was a duster and paying for it?????
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Woodbury by a goal. But, only if they start playing like they're capable of.

Otherwise, it could be three years in a row where the top seeded team fails to advance to the State Tournament from Woodburys' section.
starmvp
Posts: 3224
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:12 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by starmvp »

Looks like roster is healthy for AV so I have them winning this one 5-0.
spindrift
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:06 am

Post by spindrift »

Woodbury scores 4 goals in the opening period

Woodbury 7
AV 2

Pittman with a hat trick and Ness with 46 saves
mnsportsnetwork
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:55 pm

Post by mnsportsnetwork »

This game will be one of 13 games to be broadcast (including 12 hockey games) on the Minnesota Sports Broadcast Network on Saturday, February 28, as part of a day-long marathon of events on MSBN, found online at:

www.MnSportsNetwork.com

MSBN's schedule of Events:

11:30 AM Girls State Class "A" Championship: #2 Warroad vs. #1 Blake School
12:00 PM Section 2AA Semifinals: #1 Bloomington Jefferson vs. #4 Burnsville
1:00 PM Section 8AA Semifinal: #4 Buffalo vs. #1 Moorhead
2:30 PM Section 8AA Semifinal: #3 St. Cloud Tech vs. #2 Roseau
3:30 PM Section 2AA Semfinal: #2 Edina vs. #3 Holy Angels
4:00 PM Section 6AA Semifinal: #1 Eden Prairie vs. #4 Benilde-St. Margaret's
6:00 PM Section 3AA Semifinal: #1 Woodbury vs. #4 Apple Valley
7:00 PM Girls Hockey State Tournament: Class "AA" Championship: Hopkins vs. Stillwater
7:00 PM Section 8A Boys Semifinal: #1 Warroad vs. #4 Crookston
7:00 PM MIAC Women's Hockey Semifinals: St. Thomas vs. Bethel
7:30 PM Section 6AA Semfinal: #2 Minnetonka vs. #3 Wayzata
8:00 PM Section 3AA Semifinal: #2 Cretin-Derham Hall vs. #3 Eagan
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Woodbury had best take notice of the upsets taking place today (and near upset in 7AA) or else their season will be over tonight.
Hoops
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Hoops »

wbmd wrote:Woodbury had best take notice of the upsets taking place today (and near upset in 7AA) or else their season will be over tonight.
I don't know how much of an upset this would be. AV is a different team right now...the line up they have right now would have taken 3rd in the Lake. Should be a great game.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Gretz is coming up big in goal for Apple Valley.
InYourFace09
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by InYourFace09 »

wbmd wrote:Gretz is coming up big in goal for Apple Valley.
Does Woodbury have the advantage in possesion?
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

InYourFace09 wrote:
wbmd wrote:Gretz is coming up big in goal for Apple Valley.
Does Woodbury have the advantage in possesion?
Seems about even. Shots are 20-18 for Woodbury.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

final

Apple Valley 2 Woodbury 0.

Gretz stonewalls the Royals. Shots were 31 each.
Hoops
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Hoops »

wbmd wrote:final

Apple Valley 2 Woodbury 0.

Gretz stonewalls the Royals. Shots were 31 each.
don't forget Wdby's goalie who stopped 3-4 borderline breakaways in the final 8 minutes. Great game.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Hoops wrote:
wbmd wrote:final

Apple Valley 2 Woodbury 0.

Gretz stonewalls the Royals. Shots were 31 each.
don't forget Wdby's goalie who stopped 3-4 borderline breakaways in the final 8 minutes. Great game.
As well as stopping shorthanded attempts.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

It's now been three years in a row where the top seeded team fails to advance to the State Tournament from Woodburys' section.

In 2007, Woodbury beat #1 Cretin in the finals (2AA).

In 2008, Woodbury beat #1 Rosemount in the finals (3AA).

And now in 2009, #1 Woodbury loses in the semifinals (3AA).
slapstkhound
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:27 pm

Post by slapstkhound »

wbmd wrote:
Hoops wrote:
wbmd wrote:final

Apple Valley 2 Woodbury 0.

Gretz stonewalls the Royals. Shots were 31 each.
don't forget Wdby's goalie who stopped 3-4 borderline breakaways in the final 8 minutes. Great game.
As well as stopping shorthanded attempts.
Also...two waved off goals for Woodbury. The first was questionable but the second was clearly over the line before an AV skater pushed the net off. The whole complextion of the game would have changed. The Royals were robbed.....
hockeyjunkie2
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:42 pm
Location: Apple Valley, MN

Post by hockeyjunkie2 »

slapstkhound wrote:
wbmd wrote:
Hoops wrote: don't forget Wdby's goalie who stopped 3-4 borderline breakaways in the final 8 minutes. Great game.
As well as stopping shorthanded attempts.
Also...two waved off goals for Woodbury. The first was questionable but the second was clearly over the line before an AV skater pushed the net off. The whole complextion of the game would have changed. The Royals were robbed.....
The first was kicked in out of mid air by a royal, no arguement by any players of coaches shows that it was clearly the right call. The second I couldn't tell when the net came off (I never even saw it go in, I thought Gretz had it in his glove.) so I will only say that the net coming off was something that was happening on both ends all night. The nets were coming off on both ends easily by the goalies having to make quick slides across the goal. It was not a deliberate shove off to get a whistle.
Hoops
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:33 pm

Post by Hoops »

slapstkhound wrote:
wbmd wrote:
Hoops wrote: don't forget Wdby's goalie who stopped 3-4 borderline breakaways in the final 8 minutes. Great game.
As well as stopping shorthanded attempts.
Also...two waved off goals for Woodbury. The first was questionable but the second was clearly over the line before an AV skater pushed the net off. The whole complextion of the game would have changed. The Royals were robbed.....
The royals were not robbed and the second wasn't clearly over anything. You obviously weren't there. After the Frosh Michaelson got the only goal of the game w/ 8 minutes left AV took 2 penalties and Woodbury pulled their goalie w/ 1.30 left so in effect AV was short handed 70% of the final 8 minutes. This is when the Woodbury flurry took place..it's also when AV got their share of breakaways..shorthanded. Their was no robbery...great game and I think AV was the better team on this night.
Sykes
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:33 am

Post by Sykes »

Hoops wrote:
slapstkhound wrote:
wbmd wrote: As well as stopping shorthanded attempts.
Also...two waved off goals for Woodbury. The first was questionable but the second was clearly over the line before an AV skater pushed the net off. The whole complextion of the game would have changed. The Royals were robbed.....
The royals were not robbed and the second wasn't clearly over anything. You obviously weren't there. After the Frosh Michaelson got the only goal of the game w/ 8 minutes left AV took 2 penalties and Woodbury pulled their goalie w/ 1.30 left so in effect AV was short handed 70% of the final 8 minutes. This is when the Woodbury flurry took place..it's also when AV got their share of breakaways..shorthanded. Their was no robbery...great game and I think AV was the better team on this night.
Picture in the Woodbury Bulletin shows the goal post came off an instant prior to the puck crossing the line. The goal post is off by 2 inches when the puck was crossing the goal line. Very, very close but a good call by the official. When there are 61 shots put up and only one goal scored, a great game for both teams
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Sykes wrote:
Hoops wrote:
slapstkhound wrote: Also...two waved off goals for Woodbury. The first was questionable but the second was clearly over the line before an AV skater pushed the net off. The whole complextion of the game would have changed. The Royals were robbed.....
The royals were not robbed and the second wasn't clearly over anything. You obviously weren't there. After the Frosh Michaelson got the only goal of the game w/ 8 minutes left AV took 2 penalties and Woodbury pulled their goalie w/ 1.30 left so in effect AV was short handed 70% of the final 8 minutes. This is when the Woodbury flurry took place..it's also when AV got their share of breakaways..shorthanded. Their was no robbery...great game and I think AV was the better team on this night.
Picture in the Woodbury Bulletin shows the goal post came off an instant prior to the puck crossing the line. The goal post is off by 2 inches when the puck was crossing the goal line. Very, very close but a good call by the official. When there are 61 shots put up and only one goal scored, a great game for both teams
Good picture - and like you said, it was a good call by the official.
hockeyjunkie2
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:42 pm
Location: Apple Valley, MN

Post by hockeyjunkie2 »

wbmd wrote:
Sykes wrote:
Hoops wrote: The royals were not robbed and the second wasn't clearly over anything. You obviously weren't there. After the Frosh Michaelson got the only goal of the game w/ 8 minutes left AV took 2 penalties and Woodbury pulled their goalie w/ 1.30 left so in effect AV was short handed 70% of the final 8 minutes. This is when the Woodbury flurry took place..it's also when AV got their share of breakaways..shorthanded. Their was no robbery...great game and I think AV was the better team on this night.
Picture in the Woodbury Bulletin shows the goal post came off an instant prior to the puck crossing the line. The goal post is off by 2 inches when the puck was crossing the goal line. Very, very close but a good call by the official. When there are 61 shots put up and only one goal scored, a great game for both teams
Good picture - and like you said, it was a good call by the official.
Is there a link to the picture anywhere on online? I couldn't find one but thought you might be able to come up with it. Thanks.
Post Reply