1. Ok maybe one year, but they have almost beaten the eventual champion in the last two state tournaments, then they went on to win consolation last year. I dont think that is simply the case of a hot goaltender.. and obviously little falls wasn't only hot for a couple in a row as they only lost 3 games in the regular season... And for goodness sakes, if you dont think the state tournament reveals who the best team is , then when do you?? You already said in another topic, the beginning of the regular season basically doesnt even matter, so that doesnt leave a whole lot of games to look at.HShockeywatcher wrote:hshckfan08,
I disagree with your statement for two reasons.
1. Being upset during the playoffs doesn't mean you are not a certain quality team. We see this in NCAA hockey. A mediocre team gets hot and wins a couple in a row. Etc, etc. I may not stand with the majority here, but I don't believe the state tournament necessarily shows who is the best team.
2. In a system where you seed, especially in Class A, where you are ranked for the tournament matters, as the higher seeds play a softer schedule. The #3 team could be given the #1 seed and come out on top.
Neither of those things are why I discuss this though. That is merely to see what people think and why they think what they do. And although I cannot claim that they have not earned the opinions of others, I can claim that those people do not respond to comments that apply to a comparable situation in another class, sport, or level.
It's the same reason that while the Gophers basketball team was undefeated they weren't in the top 25. It was only after LOSING to a good mich st team and winning a few more they got ranked.
2. I'm not sure where i said seeding doesnt matter...
Maybe they werent ranked because they were 18-12 in 07-08, and 9-21 in 06-07... If Michigan Tech all of a sudden starts out 5-0 next year, people arent going to be heralding them as the favorites to win the championship