Blake Thompson, Nick Leddy and Jason Clark

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

gerryodrowski
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:35 am
Location: Trout Creek Ontario

Post by gerryodrowski »

countrygentleman wrote:Maybe I'm dead wrong on this one, but I doubt it.

Breakout= Nick Leddy's dad.

Reason being is that just today I read an article in the Eden Prairie news about Nick Leddy going to play in Slovakia, or somewhere close to, and of course Nick's dad makes an appearance in the article. He gives a reason of why Nick is staying in Eden Prairie. That reason was: The cream will rise to the top.

It's interesting that Breakout uses the exact same phrase regarding Nick on page one.

So then I do find it interesting that Mr. Breakout "isn't familiar" with the Rogge family. As far as this whole argument goes about Mr. Rogge sucking up to coaches. It's all true.
Cliche - a trite, stereotyped expression; a sentence or phrase, usually expressing a popular or common thought or idea, that has lost originality, ingenuity, and impact by long overuse, as sadder but wiser, or strong as an ox, or the cream will rise to the top.

countrygentlemen = Inspector Clouseau
GR3343
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Post by GR3343 »

Not being from EP, I'm not sure what the beef is. Are the EP parents that are on this forum upset that players are leaving? Or upset that some stay? If the players leaving, or their parents are such pains in the rear, wouldn't you welcome their departure? I'm unclear as to what the problem is. You people bash dads like Rogge with comments that make it seem like the only way his kid has made an EP team is because of the dad's brown nosed efforts, then you bash him for his kid possibly leaving. Which is it? Happy he's leaving, or pissed he's doing well? The kid is a good player that earned the right to play where he's played, and however his tryout at SSM came about, he obviously earned the spot based on talent. Why all the dissention in the EP program? If the kids that left or are leaving have done so because they were/are unhappy with the program, and those that stay or have stayed in the past are content with the program, why is there such a question about what's going on? Why is it that people need to come on here and attack a father's character or a players ability because they don't like what's going on? Get over it. As many other programs based in the metropolis that is the TC area, there are many more choices and opportunities for players. A player and their family finding the one that satisfies them for whatever reason is their choice, and their right. As long as they play within the rules, whether everyone likes and agrees with it or not, it's THEIR choice and THEIR right. Turn the page already.

By the way, good luck to those moving to different programs. Hopefully you all find what you're looking for.
Character is who you are when no one is watching
goep
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:49 pm

Post by goep »

GR3343 wrote:Not being from EP, I'm not sure what the beef is. Are the EP parents that are on this forum upset that players are leaving? Or upset that some stay? If the players leaving, or their parents are such pains in the rear, wouldn't you welcome their departure? I'm unclear as to what the problem is. You people bash dads like Rogge with comments that make it seem like the only way his kid has made an EP team is because of the dad's brown nosed efforts, then you bash him for his kid possibly leaving. Which is it? Happy he's leaving, or pissed he's doing well? The kid is a good player that earned the right to play where he's played, and however his tryout at SSM came about, he obviously earned the spot based on talent. Why all the dissention in the EP program? If the kids that left or are leaving have done so because they were/are unhappy with the program, and those that stay or have stayed in the past are content with the program, why is there such a question about what's going on? Why is it that people need to come on here and attack a father's character or a players ability because they don't like what's going on? Get over it. As many other programs based in the metropolis that is the TC area, there are many more choices and opportunities for players. A player and their family finding the one that satisfies them for whatever reason is their choice, and their right. As long as they play within the rules, whether everyone likes and agrees with it or not, it's THEIR choice and THEIR right. Turn the page already.

By the way, good luck to those moving to different programs. Hopefully you all find what you're looking for.
I think you are the only one that needs to turn the page. [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X
scoreboard33
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:53 pm

Post by scoreboard33 »

goep wrote:
GR3343 wrote:Not being from EP, I'm not sure what the beef is. Are the EP parents that are on this forum upset that players are leaving? Or upset that some stay? If the players leaving, or their parents are such pains in the rear, wouldn't you welcome their departure? I'm unclear as to what the problem is. You people bash dads like Rogge with comments that make it seem like the only way his kid has made an EP team is because of the dad's brown nosed efforts, then you bash him for his kid possibly leaving. Which is it? Happy he's leaving, or pissed he's doing well? The kid is a good player that earned the right to play where he's played, and however his tryout at SSM came about, he obviously earned the spot based on talent. Why all the dissention in the EP program? If the kids that left or are leaving have done so because they were/are unhappy with the program, and those that stay or have stayed in the past are content with the program, why is there such a question about what's going on? Why is it that people need to come on here and attack a father's character or a players ability because they don't like what's going on? Get over it. As many other programs based in the metropolis that is the TC area, there are many more choices and opportunities for players. A player and their family finding the one that satisfies them for whatever reason is their choice, and their right. As long as they play within the rules, whether everyone likes and agrees with it or not, it's THEIR choice and THEIR right. Turn the page already.

By the way, good luck to those moving to different programs. Hopefully you all find what you're looking for.
I think you are the only one that needs to turn the page. [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X
The cream will rise to the top is not a commonly used phrase and country gentleman could be right. Who knows? Who cares? We are all anonomous and credibility comes from having something to say, not if your kid is incredibly talented.

GR3343, I think the problem is parents run roughshod over the program and continually make sure that their kid is on the teams, and then leave for supposedly greener pastures when the coach is not a push over and doesn't play kids on the first line to tally points when there is a more skilled player who will help the team more at their kids spot. At EP, in high school, the coach loses players because he makes them earn their spot and doesn't hand out favors. Lee Smith is a very good coach, but at schools like EP and others, it is very hard for a coach to tell kids who have played first line their entire lives, sometimes due to their parents that they are not talented enough and have to play on the second line. They in turn think they wont develop at EP and they leave. EP has a ton of talent every year and they leave every year to play first line on a less-talented team leaving EP weak in the 2nd and 3rd lines. People are pissed for many reasons, but if you damage a "feeder" program because your kid needs to be promoted, then jump ship. People will be both happy their leaving and also angry that a kid who got a lot handed to him, jumped ship and took valuable playing time from some of the players who earned and got promoted enough to be able to jump ship, however was clearly inferior to players in the program. Its frustrating to see things work out like that for some of those kids and I understand the frustration but then again posting on this forum won't make up for lost chances, and as a Leddy's dad said, in the end, "the cream rises to the top." Mostly. GR3343 I hope this doesn't happen in your program like it does at others, but it probably happens occasionally. At EP this is a year in and year-out occurence and for the teams fans, it is very frustrating. I hope this clears up the confusion. Yes, some is jealousy, some is anger, but most is frustration at adults continually putting their kids needs over the needs of the program and then leaving at the first sign of trouble. The program is better off without them, but at the high school level, you can't give another player all those lost chances to develop at the younger levels back.


BTW, making Shattuck is a very big achievement and even though not everyone who goes their team is a superstar, it takes a very skilled player to make the team and you have to work very hard, no matter how many chances have been given to you by your parents. Yes its frustrating to see your program damaged, but these kids have nothing to do with their parents and the programs faults, so lets all wish the kids luck with their future and support our local players moving on. We can bash their parents all we want, but it is not the KIDS fault. They are all trying to play in college and farther along and have different means of going about it. Good luck with whatever path the players chose.
IMHO
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:53 pm

Post by IMHO »

scoreboard33 wrote: ...then leave for supposedly greener pastures when the coach is not a push over and doesn't play kids on the first line to tally points when there is a more skilled player who will help the team more at their kids spot.
Scoreboard, are you cracked? Until the changes this year, do you know anything about the Peewee A and Bantam A head coaches at EP??? Clearly neither of these guys could be accused NOT holding their players accountable. I even witnessed a semi-final Regional game where you lose and you’re done, where one of the very superstars that is the subject of this thread got sat for the third period. At the end of the day, this feeder program has delivered serious success.

Second, I get tired of parents that get criticized for volunteering to help out. All of a sudden they’re accused of brown nosing to get their kid ice time. While this does happen, if the kid’s horrible he ain’t gonna play. At the same time, kids that are having success often have parents that have supported their continuing to improve. It’s really a chicken and egg thing. Conversely, it’s almost ALWAYS the parent that never steps up that is the one sitting on the sidelines throwing stones at the parents that volunteer their time.

Don’t get me wrong, there are more than enough lunatic parents out there, but normally by high school it’s been established if a kid is a ‘player’. THEN, it’s up to the high school coach to put together a program that kids want to play for. It also helps if the coach actively promotes and helps his kids to the next level, e.g. D1 or even D3 college. Now people complain about how Elite I and Elite II teams are loaded with one high school or another and while this really isn’t right, it tells you where a head high school coach is really promoting his kids.

Here endth the rant.
Penalty Shot
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 11:32 am

Post by Penalty Shot »

Things I know:
1) Lee Smith is a very nice guy.
2) He has had a lot ot talent come through the High school program and had some tough losses and luck. Section final to Edina 01, injuries to Smaagaard and Kalligher in 02 and still making it to state. He has also had some teams that underacheived the 03 team won the state bantam tourney and got taken apart by Roseville in the state tourney. since then he has not made it back to the tourney.
3) The team really didnt lose anyone who was a surprise or he was counting on to have a significant role until probably 2 years ago.
Leddy is a nice player and was considering Ann Arbor but decided to stay home. Good for him. For the players who have left or are going to leave the family is ultimately doing what they think is best for their specific situation and should be left out of topics like this.
Every players situation is differnt and families need to look at this in this manner. There are so many diifernt reasons and possibilities for why kids might be better off at Shattuck, NDTP, USHL, or staying at their High School that people talking about others situations is absurd.
my2cents
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:54 am

EP

Post by my2cents »

1) Rogge is a very good player.
2) Smith is a good coach
3) Those players leaving EP can have their reasons, and it varies from player to player. I wouldn't put the sole blame on the coach.
4) Having lots of talent in a program can have some downsides.
5) Implying a "brown-nose" situation on this board is improper. Anything posted regarding it is hearsay, which I am not interested in reading about. It is also an insult to the coach to assume that if in fact, brown-nosing occurs, that it has any bearing on the young player's HS career.
6) GR3343 is an intelligent fan of HS hockey and has an open mind. He also bleeds the hometown orange GR blood.
7) Even after losing very the aforementioned talented players, EP will contend this year.
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Re: EP

Post by Neutron 14 »

my2cents wrote:1) Rogge is a very good player.
2) Smith is a good coach
3) Those players leaving EP can have their reasons, and it varies from player to player. I wouldn't put the sole blame on the coach.
4) Having lots of talent in a program can have some downsides.
5) Implying a "brown-nose" situation on this board is improper. Anything posted regarding it is hearsay, which I am not interested in reading about. It is also an insult to the coach to assume that if in fact, brown-nosing occurs, that it has any bearing on the young player's HS career.
6) GR3343 is an intelligent fan of HS hockey and has an open mind. He also bleeds the hometown orange GR blood.
7) Even after losing very the aforementioned talented players, EP will contend this year.
You had me until #6. :lol:
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Re: EP

Post by Govs93 »

Neutron 14 wrote:
my2cents wrote:1) Rogge is a very good player.
2) Smith is a good coach
3) Those players leaving EP can have their reasons, and it varies from player to player. I wouldn't put the sole blame on the coach.
4) Having lots of talent in a program can have some downsides.
5) Implying a "brown-nose" situation on this board is improper. Anything posted regarding it is hearsay, which I am not interested in reading about. It is also an insult to the coach to assume that if in fact, brown-nosing occurs, that it has any bearing on the young player's HS career.
6) GR3343 is an intelligent fan of HS hockey and has an open mind. He also bleeds the hometown orange GR blood.
7) Even after losing very the aforementioned talented players, EP will contend this year.
You had me until #6. :lol:
Isn't there some "bored" rule about duplicate accounts?

Who does this guy think he's fooling?
GR3343
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: EP

Post by GR3343 »

Govs93 wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:
my2cents wrote:1) Rogge is a very good player.
2) Smith is a good coach
3) Those players leaving EP can have their reasons, and it varies from player to player. I wouldn't put the sole blame on the coach.
4) Having lots of talent in a program can have some downsides.
5) Implying a "brown-nose" situation on this board is improper. Anything posted regarding it is hearsay, which I am not interested in reading about. It is also an insult to the coach to assume that if in fact, brown-nosing occurs, that it has any bearing on the young player's HS career.
6) GR3343 is an intelligent fan of HS hockey and has an open mind. He also bleeds the hometown orange GR blood.
7) Even after losing very the aforementioned talented players, EP will contend this year.

You had me until #6. :lol:
Isn't there some "bored" rule about duplicate accounts?

Who does this guy think he's fooling?
If you're referring to the possibility that I have multiple identities on this "bored", you're mistaken. No need to.
Character is who you are when no one is watching
bananastick
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:54 am

Post by bananastick »

Would someone PLEASE put an end to this thread?????
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Re: EP

Post by Govs93 »

GR3343 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:
You had me until #6. :lol:
Isn't there some "bored" rule about duplicate accounts?

Who does this guy think he's fooling?
If you're referring to the possibility that I have multiple identities on this "bored", you're mistaken. No need to.
Ever hurt your shoulder while patting yourself on the back (with your other account)? :wink:
GR3343
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: EP

Post by GR3343 »

Govs93 wrote:
GR3343 wrote:
Govs93 wrote: Isn't there some "bored" rule about duplicate accounts?

Who does this guy think he's fooling?
If you're referring to the possibility that I have multiple identities on this "bored", you're mistaken. No need to.
Ever hurt your shoulder while patting yourself on the back (with your other account)? :wink:
Aaah, more bait :lol:
Character is who you are when no one is watching
breakout
Posts: 2485
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by breakout »

countrygentleman wrote:Maybe I'm dead wrong on this one, but I doubt it.

Breakout= Nick Leddy's dad.

Reason being is that just today I read an article in the Eden Prairie news about Nick Leddy going to play in Slovakia, or somewhere close to, and of course Nick's dad makes an appearance in the article. He gives a reason of why Nick is staying in Eden Prairie. That reason was: The cream will rise to the top.

It's interesting that Breakout uses the exact same phrase regarding Nick on page one.

So then I do find it interesting that Mr. Breakout "isn't familiar" with the Rogge family. As far as this whole argument goes about Mr. Rogge sucking up to coaches. It's all true.
You are all over it Big Country. Here's something to look at for your portfolio.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2 ... e-top.aspx

Don't quit your day job :oops:
countrygentleman
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:50 pm

Post by countrygentleman »

:?:
Iraqnam
Locked