Section 5AA 2008-2009

SnowFlake · Post by **SnowFlake** » Mon May 12, 2008 1:59 pm

Who will be looking good in this section next year?

Players to watch?

Which team will be playing at the "X" in March?

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:11 pm

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:15 pm

SnowFlake wrote:Who will be looking good in this section next year?

Players to watch?

Which team will be playing at the "X" in March?

The Lost City of course. Nobodys close.

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:17 pm

Rogers- They are the furthest North

I think

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:18 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
SnowFlake wrote:Who will be looking good in this section next year?

Players to watch?

Which team will be playing at the "X" in March?
The Lost City of course. Nobodys close.

Or was it "The City That Lost"?

HSHockeyFan08 · Post by **HSHockeyFan08** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:45 pm

The favorite has to be Centennial, returning Pitlick, Hess, and Lovick. The only question mark will be goaltending.

The dark horse here might be Maple Grove. They were a team without seniors last year. And again, goaltending might be in question.

Blaine also could have a strong year with both Hollerud and Harper being extremely capable.

Just my two cents.

pondhockeyfan19 · Post by **pondhockeyfan19** » Tue May 13, 2008 8:06 pm

all teams suffer big losses. its gonna be a down year. i still see blaine and centenial as the favorites with osseo as the sleeper.

HSHockeyFan08 · Post by **HSHockeyFan08** » Tue May 13, 2008 8:47 pm

A huge question mark for Osseo is their goaltender. He will give up at least 3-6 goals a game.

Jimmy Dean · Post by **Jimmy Dean** » Fri May 16, 2008 5:11 pm

IMHO Centennial and Blaine are coached very well. Both teams have talent, but they seem to be led by fine coaching staffs. This item accounts for much of each programs success over the years. Osseo, Rogers and Maple Grove will be right behind, each program has alot of talented players. Good Luck to all in the upcoming season.

DannyCalifornia · Post by **DannyCalifornia** » Sat May 17, 2008 4:51 pm

IMHO Centennial and Blaine are coached very well. Both teams have talent, but they seem to be led by fine coaching staffs.

You're off your rocker with that one. If anything I would say they have a ton of talent. Will they compete and one of them win the conference, probably YES, because of the talent level. But to suggest that the coaches they have in place currently are some sort of geniuses is a laugh. Any coach that has talent like these 2 assoc. do better win and at a high level or they will be gone, which is why the centennial coaches may be feeling the heat.

mnhockey2431 · Post by **mnhockey2431** » Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:49 pm

I see irondale winning it all haha.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:00 am

mnhockey2431 wrote:I see irondale winning it all haha.

You need glasses

IMHO · Post by **IMHO** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:37 am

DannyCalifornia wrote:...to suggest that the coaches they have in place currently are some sort of geniuses is a laugh. Any coach that has talent like these 2 assoc. do better win and at a high level or they will be gone, which is why the centennial coaches may be feeling the heat.

No question both teams have talent. But if you have a coach that either doesn't know how or has lost the desire to build a winning program, a team with plenty of talent can be wasted. There are plenty of examples of that. Both the Blaine AND Centennial coach not only have the desire to win, but they actively promote their kids for Elite and Model camp type of opportunities as well as any way they can with colleges. I'd take either coach.

King of the Pond · Post by **King of the Pond** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:09 am

Theres no question that this is centennials year to win it. This will be almost the exact same team that won the A Bantam title over Edina. Im seeing a rematch of that game for this years state championship with Edina also having loads of talent.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:40 am

King of the Pond wrote:Theres no question that this is centennials year to win it. This will be almost the exact same team that won the A Bantam title over Edina. Im seeing a rematch of that game for this years state championship with Edina also having loads of talent.

I thought people said their year was last year

Now it's this year? sooner or later someone's gonna be right.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:21 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
King of the Pond wrote:Theres no question that this is centennials year to win it. This will be almost the exact same team that won the A Bantam title over Edina. Im seeing a rematch of that game for this years state championship with Edina also having loads of talent.
I thought people said their year was last year Now it's this year? sooner or later someone's gonna be right.

Not this season.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:46 pm

Govs93 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
King of the Pond wrote:Theres no question that this is centennials year to win it. This will be almost the exact same team that won the A Bantam title over Edina. Im seeing a rematch of that game for this years state championship with Edina also having loads of talent.
I thought people said their year was last year Now it's this year? sooner or later someone's gonna be right.
Not this season.

Now THATS funny! Well done Govs!

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:57 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote: I thought people said their year was last year Now it's this year? sooner or later someone's gonna be right.
Not this season.
Now THATS funny! Well done Govs!

Speaking of TOOLS

Govs I believe you are the only one with enough time to come up with something like that, truly a piece of work.

Govs93 · Post by **Govs93** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:58 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:
Govs93 wrote: Not this season.
Now THATS funny! Well done Govs!
Speaking of TOOLS

Govs I believe you are the only one with enough time to come up with something like that, truly a piece of work.

Eh.. I'm salaried, so I was paid for doing it.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:07 pm

Govs93 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote: Now THATS funny! Well done Govs!
Speaking of TOOLS

Govs I believe you are the only one with enough time to come up with something like that, truly a piece of work.
Eh.. I'm salaried, so I was paid for doing it.

Me too! how do you think I could afford to respond?

HOFam'r · Post by **HOFam'r** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:26 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Govs93 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote: Speaking of TOOLS

Govs I believe you are the only one with enough time to come up with something like that, truly a piece of work.
Eh.. I'm salaried, so I was paid for doing it.
Me too! how do you think I could afford to respond?

Guys- it's a long summer and it's easy to believe that this year will be better than the last...

Bench Major · Post by **Bench Major** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:42 pm

Where's the love, 28 votes so far, with Irondale and North Metro with votes, and last seasons #2 seed has yet to be thrown a bone - OUCH.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:57 am

I see CNT has 7 account names!

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:53 am

Neutron 14 wrote:I see CNT has 7 account names!

Where did you think the other 7 votes for the lost city came from?

Sparlimb · Post by **Sparlimb** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:00 am

HOFam'r wrote:Guys- it's a long summer and it's easy to believe that this year will be better than the last...

I'd be happy for just as good as last year...

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section 5AA 2008-2009

Who Will Win It?

Section 5AA 2008-2009

Re: Section 5AA 2008-2009

Re: Section 5AA 2008-2009

Coaches that want to build a program WIN

Champlin Park