For all the "citiots"

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:47 pm

wow, BIAFP is trying to be mindlessly rude like usual and fails with his facts again. I wasn't raised on hockey and I know that in the younger years of playing hockey you play for your city. If you go to Hill Murray but live in WBL, you can play for their Bantam team until 9th grade. By going to Hill instead of WBL you aren't "taking away" from their team. You are playing for your city, or home organization, then for high school, just as public school students do.

I know St Thomas has a Bantam team, which makes sense since they have a middle school. Not sure about other schools.

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:04 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:wow, BIAFP is trying to be mindlessly rude

How can you say that about our BIAFP?

He is just confused a bit.

If he knew that the public schools rip off our private youth programs for all their players while contributing nothing to them, he would not stand for it. Not for one minute.

RidingPine32 · Post by **RidingPine32** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:19 pm

Junior Samples wrote:you have to remember that "us" northerners could care less about hockey. this whole thing is a joke. it's people like the 'citiots' that froth and gnash their teeth at the thought of watching a girls 10U game, while being completely oblivious to what's happening to the united states in world economics and impending global war.

as hunters up north, we believe in the 2nd amendment.

"we've got guns, yes we do, we've got guns, how 'bout you?!"

Coo- Coo

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:30 pm

The lack of oxygen in his bomb shelter must be getting to him.

The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:55 am

One, I assumed someone probably meant SCSU by SCS, but just had to check.

Two, I didn't mean to leave the impression I think they aren't a quality team. They were, but I think they were overrated. They had a joke schedule. Before state they played the same number of quality opponents as Roesau but weren't defending champs. They ended up making it too and beating Roseau, but all in all, they didn't beat many good teams. Not a bad team, but based on what they did during the season how high they were ranked was an overinflated ranking. My opinion.

Three, not sure what it has to do with hockey, but you're right, hunting is unconstitutional.

Trashman · Post by **Trashman** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:46 am

They can't do much about the power of the other teams in their conference, but their schedule still included wins over STA (twice), BSM, White Bear Lake (3 times), Duluth East, and Moorhead. That's 8 wins against quality opponents. Throw in a win over Wayzata and loses to Minnetonka and AHA and that's not a bad schedule for a team that plays in such a weak conference.

HockeyFan1 · Post by **HockeyFan1** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:51 am

HShockeywatcher wrote:wow, BIAFP is trying to be mindlessly rude like usual and fails with his facts again. I wasn't raised on hockey and I know that in the younger years of playing hockey you play for your city. If you go to Hill Murray but live in WBL, you can play for their Bantam team until 9th grade. By going to Hill instead of WBL you aren't "taking away" from their team. You are playing for your city, or home organization, then for high school, just as public school students do.

I know St Thomas has a Bantam team, which makes sense since they have a middle school. Not sure about other schools.

How did the fans in 210 put it .....oh yes, "Where's your city".... I liked that cheer

rams1989 · Post by **rams1989** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:57 am

packerboy wrote:There were 5 very good teams this year.

Edina, BSM, Tonka, HM and Roseau. Put them in any order you like.

None of these teams would be undefeated if they played a double round robin but it sure would be fun to watch.

I'd buy a ticket for that!

watchdog · Post by **watchdog** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:35 pm

bsm should have won that game against edina.. they clearly out played the hornets in that game. on a personal note i was glad to see edina win. it turned out to be the only chance we had for public school to pull it out.

pucknut87 · Post by **pucknut87** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:32 am

ROSEAU COULD TAKE HILL 7 OF 10 TIMES EASILY!HILL JUST GOT LUCKY THAT NESS DIDNT DOMINATE PLAY LIKE A NORMAL DAY!

TTpuckster · Post by **TTpuckster** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:05 pm

packerboy wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:wow, BIAFP is trying to be mindlessly rude
How can you say that about our BIAFP?

He is just confused a bit.

If he knew that the public schools rip off our private youth programs for all their players while contributing nothing to them, he would not stand for it. Not for one minute.

PB, You're on a roll!!!!!!!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:09 pm

pucknut87 wrote:ROSEAU COULD TAKE HILL 7 OF 10 TIMES EASILY!HILL JUST GOT LUCKY THAT NESS DIDNT DOMINATE PLAY LIKE A NORMAL DAY!

tsk, tsk...

Twelve posts in and your credibility is already shot...

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:08 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
tsk, tsk...

Twelve posts in and your credibility is already shot...

I dunno, I kinda like the kid Twelve posts and two of them saying he hated Edina.

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:45 pm

pucknut87 wrote:ROSEAU COULD TAKE HILL 7 OF 10 TIMES EASILY!HILL JUST GOT LUCKY THAT NESS DIDNT DOMINATE PLAY LIKE A NORMAL DAY against a cup cake schedule!

I saw that you needed an assist my hockey friend. The second assist, like always on the Roso scoring sheet, goes to #10.

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:53 pm

Speaking of 7 or 10... the guys from up Nord in Roseau with those jersey numbers dive pretty good (not much else against Hill).

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

For all the "citiots"

Re: we've got guns like aaron ness.

For all the "citiots"

Re: For all the "citiots"

Re: For all the "citiots"

Re: For all the "citiots"