Burnsville vs Jefferson

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

easton18
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:34 pm
Location: 600 East Highway 13

Post by easton18 »

since when is losing after being up 3-0 late in the second period not a choke? but 80 is right, jefferson's inexperience was the key to them not being able to hold the lead...to put it nicely
cuda701
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:03 pm

disallowed goal

Post by cuda701 »

What is the story on the disallowed goal? Goldenhockey seems to be fair in his assessment. (not as pompous as some posters)

Anyway, the young Jags will be tough next year.....as they always are.
hockeylover
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by hockeylover »

The Jags had a goal disallowed because the ref said the net was off. The guy who takes pictures for Jefferson has a picute of the puck in the net and the goal still on. It is a tough one for the Jags, but it happens, nothing you can do about it.
MNhockeyFan19
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:18 am

Post by MNhockeyFan19 »

hockeylover wrote:The Jags had a goal disallowed because the ref said the net was off. The guy who takes pictures for Jefferson has a picute of the puck in the net and the goal still on. It is a tough one for the Jags, but it happens, nothing you can do about it.
link to the picture?
hockeylover
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by hockeylover »

He hasn't posted it on his site yet.
tjkhavgam
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:15 pm

Post by tjkhavgam »

hockeylover wrote:The Jags had a goal disallowed because the ref said the net was off. The guy who takes pictures for Jefferson has a picute of the puck in the net and the goal still on. It is a tough one for the Jags, but it happens, nothing you can do about it.
hockeylover can u please post it on here when he does have it on his site.. it would be interesting to see..thanks
Post Reply