School Record..

Rbkhockey21 · Post by **Rbkhockey21** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:38 pm

Im not sure if many people really care about this but I thought i'd just give some credit out to this years '07-'08 Rosemount team who with last nights 8-5 win over LN they set a new school record for most wins in a season..

Congrats and keep up the great work making us alum proud!

FoSho · Post by **FoSho** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:17 pm

yea we're pretty good

STC18 · Post by **STC18** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:27 pm

FoSho wrote:yea we're pretty good

Ya know what they sayyy..."Karma's a B****....fo sho."

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:31 pm

Breaking any record is always a nice thing..congrats to them

Fargo · Post by **Fargo** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:53 pm

SiouxRecruit wrote:Breaking any record is always a nice thing..congrats to them

Ditto congrats

hockey1410 · Post by **hockey1410** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:03 pm

How many wins?

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:05 pm

hockey1410 wrote:How many wins?

probably atleast one more than the previous record.....and im just taking a stab at it....

Rbkhockey21 · Post by **Rbkhockey21** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:08 pm

SiouxRecruit wrote:
hockey1410 wrote:How many wins?
probably atleast one more than the previous record.....and im just taking a stab at it....

yes it is at least one more than the previous record of 17 wins set back in 1985. So yes the new record stands at 18

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:17 pm

Lets hope they can continue to win. This lake race is great stuff.

Jacketfan06 · Post by **Jacketfan06** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:03 am

Congrats to Rosemount

Cabela10 · Post by **Cabela10** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:16 am

Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.

What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?

eagle4life9 · Post by **eagle4life9** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:25 pm

When I played they were always in district 8 with the Lakevilles, Woodbury, Eagan, etc.

hockeydad · Post by **hockeydad** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:00 am

Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.

What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?

Rosemount has been in the Lake since they and Apple Valley left the Missota in the mid '80s.

and, as most people know, Rosemount, Eagan, Apple Valley and Eastview are all part of the same school district. Until the mid'70s (1976, i think) there was only one high school in that district - Rosemount. The others opened as the District grew (Eagan in the 80s, Eastview in the 90s).

That said, they are a perfect fit in the Lake, which has seven of its 11 schools in Dakota County.

CrossbarandIn99 · Post by **CrossbarandIn99** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:03 am

COngrats to Rosemount, they are a very good squad

Cabela10 · Post by **Cabela10** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:21 am

hockeydad wrote:
Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.

What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?
Rosemount has been in the Lake since they and Apple Valley left the Missota in the mid '80s.

and, as most people know, Rosemount, Eagan, Apple Valley and Eastview are all part of the same school district.

I don't give a crap about what school district they are in. I asked what DISTRICT THE YOUTH PROGRAM PLAYS IN.

hockeydad · Post by **hockeydad** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:06 am

eagle4life9 wrote:When I played they were always in district 8 with the Lakevilles, Woodbury, Eagan, etc.

And you already had an answer to that question. They are in district 8.

You also asked why they aren't in the Classic Suburban. My post was explaining whey they are in the Lake, which kinda answers your question.

The Classic Suburban is mostly Class A sized schools (exceptions North St. Paul, Tartan and Sibley). With almost 2,000 students according to MSHSL, Rosemount is about twice as big as some of the Classic Suburban schools.

the one to love · Post by **the one to love** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:32 am

Cabela10 wrote:Why isn't Rosemount in the Classic Suburban? They are in a conference with West-Southwest schools.

What district does Rosemounts Youth program play in?

You may want to check the maps again. Last time I saw they were not a west-southwest school. Those would be something like Burnsville over to EP-ish area

Cabela10 · Post by **Cabela10** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:58 am

Okay, I was just curious because I remember playing rosemount when I was a kid. I figured they were in the same district as Woodbury, Eagan, Inver Grove, South St. Paul, Hastings, Cottage Grove. All the east suburbs. It's strange to me that they are in a conference with teams that are in the west, Eden Prairie.

High School should keep the youth rivalry's alive and align the conferences as close to the youth programs as possible.

You forgot to mention Hill Murray in your Classic Suburban AA schools.

hockeydad · Post by **hockeydad** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:09 pm

Hill Murray is actually the smallest school in the conference by MSHSL enrollment figures. (STA's enrollment is less, but it is an all boys school so the MSHSL doubles the number).

They opt up in hockey only - as they should. all other sports they stay in their assigned class.

Cabela10 · Post by **Cabela10** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:36 pm

I'm just saying they are playing in the AA class.