WBL at Roseville 2/7

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

WBL at Roseville 2/7

Post by formerlybackofnet »

Thoughts?
DAREALwhitebearsuperfan
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:16 pm

Post by DAREALwhitebearsuperfan »

Im thinking that WB will have a better game against the Raiders this time. They will come out with more playing a better game.
WB 4 OT
Raiders 3
HD1
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:20 am

Post by HD1 »

If the Bears are going to win this one, they need to start playing better hockey. Other than beating up on the lowly Wolfpack, they have not looked sharp the last 5 games. Their powerplay has been horrible. Screen the goalie, shoot the puck at the net, and go hard for the rebound. Stop wasting time moving it around the perimeter and giving the opposing goalies clean looks at the shot.

Also, show some discipline and stop taking stupid penalties.

Like the Raiders & Royals, the Bears have a chance to win the conference title. Time to shorten the bench and get serious. I guess will we see who wants it more. Win out, win the title. It is that simple.
Pucknutz69
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm

Post by Pucknutz69 »

I am going with Roseville on in this one, WBL doesn't seem like they care too much right now.
ImissMYhockey
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm

Post by ImissMYhockey »

raiders-4
WBL-2
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

Pucknutz69 wrote:I am going with Roseville on in this one, WBL doesn't seem like they care too much right now.
ha how would you know if White Bear cares or not. They have been looking forward to the rematch with Roseville for a long time and they have had a week off to think about it. They might start slow like they usually do but i think they will turn it on and come out on top. Contain Mueller and they win the game.

WBL - 4
Roseville - 2
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Roseville 3
W.B.L. 2
Jacketfan06
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: north eastern MN

..

Post by Jacketfan06 »

this should be a very good game. im leaning more towards wbl but it could go either way. im going to guess 4 to 2 wbl[/i]
Tuffy04
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:16 am

Re: ..

Post by Tuffy04 »

They better not start out slow super fan, because if they do it will be 3-0 after one.

Raiders 6
Bears 2
score14me
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:57 pm

Post by score14me »

If the Raiders get on the scoreboard first with one (or two) before getting any penalties, and the goalie plays as solid as last time, Roseville will get the win.
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Post by formerlybackofnet »

score14me wrote:If the Raiders get on the scoreboard first with one (or two) before getting any penalties, and the goalie plays as solid as last time, Roseville will get the win.
Same for the Bears, Abrahamson had a good game at the Schwans cup agianst Roseville , but looked terrible in the second game. Goaltending wil say alot about the outcome of game 3.
hockeyxfan01
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm

Post by hockeyxfan01 »

If White Bear starts out solid (which they haven't really since Woodbury), they'll pull off the win. If they don't, this game will look a whole lot like the last one.
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

bump
sicknasty7722
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:21 pm

Post by sicknasty7722 »

whitebearsuperfanB wrote:Contain Mueller and they win the game.
Easy for you to say.

I'm sorry to blame the last game on the goalie, but you gotta put 80% of the blame on Aberhamson as the three goals he let in were WEAK...especially the second two (downright embarrassing). And the fourth one can also be blamed on Aberhamson as Owen didn't get warmed up (because of Aber) and let in a goal right away.

This one will turn out different.

Bears- 4
Raiders- 3

In a thriller!
guitarer1c
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:20 am

Post by guitarer1c »

From my source at the game, I heard the following:

•Roseville was up 1-0 for most of the 1st period

•The Bears scored two goals in less than a minute near the end of the period to make it 2-1

•The Bears spent most of the game in the penalty box; Roseville was 5 on 3 in the 3rd but couldn't score

•Not sure how Roseville tied it up
score14me
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:57 pm

Post by score14me »

Bears scored 2 early in the 2nd period.
Roseville scored late in the 3rd to tie it up.
Both teams had their share of box time.
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Post by formerlybackofnet »

guitarer1c wrote:From my source at the game, I heard the following:

•Roseville was up 1-0 for most of the 1st period

•The Bears scored two goals in less than a minute near the end of the period to make it 2-1

•The Bears spent most of the game in the penalty box; Roseville was 5 on 3 in the 3rd but couldn't score

•Not sure how Roseville tied it up
You're right, the Bears spent alot of time in the box, once agian victims of the roseville refs. the 5 on 3 was in the overtime!
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

Roseville's first goal, by Mueller, had to have been one of the best goals I have seen all year last night.

White Bear did spend a lot of time in the box but did a good job on the penalty kill.

Overall, the game was very even and could have been won by either team. In the last couple minutes of play, the Bears had a shot go of the crossbar and Roseville did have 30 sec- 1 min of 5 on 3 during OT.
Ginos All Day
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

GREAT goaltending in this one as well. Collette had one of his best games of the year and Podobinski played well and had some clutch saves at the end of the game.
Ginos All Day
Post Reply