Frank Brimsek Award
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm
Phillipi has a good GAA because of BOTH teams in front of him: Hill and some horrible opponent they're playing.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:The brimsek award is a tough one because going strictly on stats will not tell you who the best goaltender is. Some of these goalies have outstanding gaa's because of the team in front of them.
If these guys vote blindly and look at stats only, which is possible? I'm not sure how it works.... I would say your winner will be phillippi.
Ginos All Day
-
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
- Location: Miami, FL
Hill has the 27th toughest schedule according to PS2 rankings. Doesn't look like they have too many "horrible" opponents on their schedule.SECHockeyFan wrote:Phillipi has a good GAA because of BOTH teams in front of him: Hill and some horrible opponent they're playing.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:The brimsek award is a tough one because going strictly on stats will not tell you who the best goaltender is. Some of these goalies have outstanding gaa's because of the team in front of them.
If these guys vote blindly and look at stats only, which is possible? I'm not sure how it works.... I would say your winner will be phillippi.

The U invented swagger.
post 9804
Mike Lee Argument:
I believe only a senior can win this award. That means he should not be involved in this topic.
I believe only a senior can win this award. That means he should not be involved in this topic.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:04 am
post 9806
I believe just Mike Lee and No. Most goalies play juniors first. I think the only goalie playing D1 this year from last year's senior class is Reid Ellingson (Cloquet) for Northern Michigan. That stat could be wrong, however.hockeyfanatic99 wrote:How many of this list have committed to college - and is that a measure of their ability?
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
post 9807
There isn't a banquet to present the award. The winner attends the Mr. Hockey Banquet and is honored there. I believe it is announced very late in the season.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:anyone know when this is announced? and how many goalies are invited to the banquet as finalists?
-
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:54 pm
Somebody asked where these kids went. This is what I know.
2007-Reid Ellingson-starting goalie for Northern Michigan
2006-Austin Lee-at Mankato State, as a freshman has yet to start
2005-Alec Richards-3 year starter for Yale.
2004-Matt Lundin-two years at Maine and is now playing for Mercyhurst
2003-Jon Anderson-two years for the UConn
2002-Josh Johnson-four years at UMD and is rising star in the ECHL (South Carolina)
2001-Eric Aarnio-starting goalie in his fourth year at University of Nebraska Omaha
2000-Jake Brant-played four years at UND
1999-Adam Laaksonen-played at St John’s (Mn) University
1998-Adam Coole-played two years at UMD, forced to transfer to St. Cloud beat MUD
1997-Kyle Kolquist-played four years for Notre Dame
1996-Karl Goehring-played four years at UND, playing for Syracuse Crunch in AHL
1995-Todd Kelzenberg-played two years at Minnesota State
They may not have all made in pro hockey, but each had a free ride at a scholarship (don't know about Yale). One had a pre-med on his mind, most had opportunities to play D1 hockey, and one is in his senior year at Yale. I call that a success.
2007-Reid Ellingson-starting goalie for Northern Michigan
2006-Austin Lee-at Mankato State, as a freshman has yet to start
2005-Alec Richards-3 year starter for Yale.
2004-Matt Lundin-two years at Maine and is now playing for Mercyhurst
2003-Jon Anderson-two years for the UConn
2002-Josh Johnson-four years at UMD and is rising star in the ECHL (South Carolina)
2001-Eric Aarnio-starting goalie in his fourth year at University of Nebraska Omaha
2000-Jake Brant-played four years at UND
1999-Adam Laaksonen-played at St John’s (Mn) University
1998-Adam Coole-played two years at UMD, forced to transfer to St. Cloud beat MUD
1997-Kyle Kolquist-played four years for Notre Dame
1996-Karl Goehring-played four years at UND, playing for Syracuse Crunch in AHL
1995-Todd Kelzenberg-played two years at Minnesota State
They may not have all made in pro hockey, but each had a free ride at a scholarship (don't know about Yale). One had a pre-med on his mind, most had opportunities to play D1 hockey, and one is in his senior year at Yale. I call that a success.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:36 am
post 9819
Thanks! I appreciate the list.frederick61 wrote:Somebody asked where these kids went. This is what I know.
2007-Reid Ellingson-starting goalie for Northern Michigan
2006-Austin Lee-at Mankato State, as a freshman has yet to start
2005-Alec Richards-3 year starter for Yale.
2004-Matt Lundin-two years at Maine and is now playing for Mercyhurst
2003-Jon Anderson-two years for the UConn
2002-Josh Johnson-four years at UMD and is rising star in the ECHL (South Carolina)
2001-Eric Aarnio-starting goalie in his fourth year at University of Nebraska Omaha
2000-Jake Brant-played four years at UND
1999-Adam Laaksonen-played at St John’s (Mn) University
1998-Adam Coole-played two years at UMD, forced to transfer to St. Cloud beat MUD
1997-Kyle Kolquist-played four years for Notre Dame
1996-Karl Goehring-played four years at UND, playing for Syracuse Crunch in AHL
1995-Todd Kelzenberg-played two years at Minnesota State
They may not have all made in pro hockey, but each had a free ride at a scholarship (don't know about Yale). One had a pre-med on his mind, most had opportunities to play D1 hockey, and one is in his senior year at Yale. I call that a success.
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:53 pm
the only thing yumusaklar has against him is the fact that he's never had a winning season. Phillipi, Morgan, and Caschetta have all had multiple winning seasons.
sorry if it's already been covered, but what factors play into deciding who wins it? career achievements? senior year only? anybody know?
sorry if it's already been covered, but what factors play into deciding who wins it? career achievements? senior year only? anybody know?
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
yeah, thats the hard part, how is it scored? yumusaklar hasnt had a winning season, but is it his fault? he has had numerous 50+ save performances in his career..the other goalies havent..its all based on how good your team is in front of you....Thats why I say, talent alone, and Ive seen all the top SR goalies play...Id give it to yumusaklar..but I dont know what the criteria iswhatitdobaby wrote:the only thing yumusaklar has against him is the fact that he's never had a winning season. Phillipi, Morgan, and Caschetta have all had multiple winning seasons.
sorry if it's already been covered, but what factors play into deciding who wins it? career achievements? senior year only? anybody know?
If this is an award for goalies on strong dominate teams then of course Cashetta wins but if this award is for the accomplishments of an individual goal tender, continued skill development (CANI) and relevance to team success then my vote is for Morgan.
Morgan is a transplant from Mississippi who came to MN as a Bantam.
After a successful single A season in Northfield where he was the starter his sophmore year posting very impressive numbers, he made the jump to a AA Rosemount team that was struggling with its identity. (a very young team, 2nd year Coach and the loss of two of its stars (Sainty-Walters). An impressive move on Morgans part as many talented players seek out high profile private schools (STA/AHA/Blake) rather then the rigorous sechedule of any Lake conference team.
The transition was tough and the sechedule was one of the toughest in MN hockey that season. The Irish went head to head with the toughest teams in the state. Morgans personal numbers suffered but that is what developement should look like and this season he came back for more.
Irish have developed well as a team and as a team they are enjoying an impresive year, early on due to tremendous offensive talent but of late (since x-mas) due to very impressive goal tending.
It is one thing to be a power house team like Edina or Roseau or AHA in years past, but it is quite another to develope into a top team through hard work ethic and heart. The story in Rosemount is what High School Hockey is all about.
There are many fine senior goaltenders competing this season but as I stated in and earlier post my vote is Morgan and I hope I've helped to make his case.

Morgan is a transplant from Mississippi who came to MN as a Bantam.
After a successful single A season in Northfield where he was the starter his sophmore year posting very impressive numbers, he made the jump to a AA Rosemount team that was struggling with its identity. (a very young team, 2nd year Coach and the loss of two of its stars (Sainty-Walters). An impressive move on Morgans part as many talented players seek out high profile private schools (STA/AHA/Blake) rather then the rigorous sechedule of any Lake conference team.
The transition was tough and the sechedule was one of the toughest in MN hockey that season. The Irish went head to head with the toughest teams in the state. Morgans personal numbers suffered but that is what developement should look like and this season he came back for more.
Irish have developed well as a team and as a team they are enjoying an impresive year, early on due to tremendous offensive talent but of late (since x-mas) due to very impressive goal tending.
It is one thing to be a power house team like Edina or Roseau or AHA in years past, but it is quite another to develope into a top team through hard work ethic and heart. The story in Rosemount is what High School Hockey is all about.
There are many fine senior goaltenders competing this season but as I stated in and earlier post my vote is Morgan and I hope I've helped to make his case.

-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:53 pm
-
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
-
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
agreed, they are both on display tommorrow night against each other..Im still trying to get the wife to let me go hahaBash Brother wrote:I was being sarcastic. I feel its really between morgan and yumuCrossbarandIn99 wrote:disagreed..but we can argue it all day...its tough to say,depends how they grade the goaltendersBash Brother wrote:Ya that pretty much wraps it up. Mike Morgan wins the Brimsek.
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:45 am
I always get a kick out of how misinforming the Star Trib is when listing goalie stats.
Hakan and Morgan are both have over 900 minutes and are not listed due to gaa.
Hakan at 2.94 and morgan at 2.70
Both these guys have just above a 90 Save % which means they are seeing 29.4 (Hakan) and 27 (Morgan) Shots per game respectivly.
Cashetta and Phillipi are listed
they too have over 900 Min
Cashetta with a 1.74 Gaa and Phillipi with a 1.59 Gaa
Coupled with save % Cashetta at 91.9 and Phillipi at 92 indicates they are seeing 19 to 20 shot respectivly pergame.
While these guys certianly deserve recognition they are listed next to guys who have played less then 500 Minutes and have seen less the 300 shots.
Makes no sence and neglects the Metros top performers.
Hakan and Morgan are both have over 900 minutes and are not listed due to gaa.
Hakan at 2.94 and morgan at 2.70
Both these guys have just above a 90 Save % which means they are seeing 29.4 (Hakan) and 27 (Morgan) Shots per game respectivly.
Cashetta and Phillipi are listed
they too have over 900 Min
Cashetta with a 1.74 Gaa and Phillipi with a 1.59 Gaa
Coupled with save % Cashetta at 91.9 and Phillipi at 92 indicates they are seeing 19 to 20 shot respectivly pergame.
While these guys certianly deserve recognition they are listed next to guys who have played less then 500 Minutes and have seen less the 300 shots.
Makes no sence and neglects the Metros top performers.