White Bear Lake vs Park Cottage Grove - Jan. 26

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply

Who will win?

White Bear
11
73%
Park
4
27%
 
Total votes: 15

whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

White Bear Lake vs Park Cottage Grove - Jan. 26

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

Any possibility of the Bears being upset again?
hockeyfan43
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:45 am

Post by hockeyfan43 »

no way
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

I hope so, but I highly doubt it!!!
hockeyxfan01
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm

Post by hockeyxfan01 »

The last upset was because White Bear didn't take Park seriously enough, so unless they make the same mistake twice there's very little chance for another one.

WBL 5
Park 1
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

White Bear by 3.
youngblood52
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:24 pm

Post by youngblood52 »

You never knwo what could happen. Moser has Park playing some pretty decent hockey right now
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

WBL BY 2
ImissMYhockey
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm

Post by ImissMYhockey »

Last time WB and Park played , WB had players suspended and were dealing with many off the ice distractions. Park has gone back to their true colors. WB by 4
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

My answer changes depending upon who I want to win v who I think will win. :D
DAREALwhitebearsuperfan
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:16 pm

Post by DAREALwhitebearsuperfan »

WB 3
Park 1
chillout
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:39 pm

Post by chillout »

Bears by 14
shooter812
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:25 am

Post by shooter812 »

youngblood how can you say Moser has the wolfpack playing good hockey they've scored like 3 goals and given up like 18 in there last 5 games. Moser has nothing to work with, it's going to take atleast a decade to get the program back to where he wants it because of all the early transfers to HM and Cretin.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

shooter812 wrote:youngblood how can you say Moser has the wolfpack playing good hockey they've scored like 3 goals and given up like 18 in there last 5 games. Moser has nothing to work with, it's going to take atleast a decade to get the program back to where he wants it because of all the early transfers to HM and Cretin.
:roll:
Orty
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:38 pm

Post by Orty »

White Bear: 5
Park: 1

Orty
rbk101
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:51 pm

Post by rbk101 »

Bears win this one 9 - 0. The boys came ready to play this time!!
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

White Bear absolutely dominated this game. WB goals and Park shots were probably pretty close. WB got 4 goals from Fiala and 2 from Lowell. Unlike last time, the Bears actually got the puck in the net.
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

Any word on the injury to Wolter. He didn't play after the 1st period. He appeared to have a leg injury. He came out before the third and was testing his bum wheel and appeared like he wanted to play. It looked like Sager told him to take the rest of the night off.
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

SEC Scotty wrote:Any word on the injury to Wolter. He didn't play after the 1st period. He appeared to have a leg injury. He came out before the third and was testing his bum wheel and appeared like he wanted to play. It looked like Sager told him to take the rest of the night off.
Yea i don't think Sager thought it was worth the risk and it definetly wasn't. I hear it is either a thigh or groin but i'm pretty sure its nothing serious. I should find out more tomorrow so i will keep you updated.
wblsuperfan'E'
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:59 am

Post by wblsuperfan'E' »

One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.

WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

wblsuperfan'E' wrote:One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.

WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
It amazes me how after watching that game that we lost to that same team..
hockeyxfan01
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm

Post by hockeyxfan01 »

Looks like White Bear put Park back in their place.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

wblsuperfan'E' wrote:One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.

WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
http://www.pointstreak.com/players/game ... eid=634575
According to this, Park had 11 shots in the game.
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

SECHockeyFan wrote:White Bear absolutely dominated this game. WB goals and Park shots were probably pretty close. WB got 4 goals from Fiala and 2 from Lowell. Unlike last time, the Bears actually got the puck in the net.
Swanson also had 2 goals, and almost thee 3rd at the end of the game.
Post Reply