Grand Rapids/Anoka 1/26/2008 at the IRA

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

GR3343
Posts: 1198
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:39 pm

Post by GR3343 »

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:
grindiangrad-80 wrote:I agree.
1 problem the way rapids plays they dont deserve the 3 spot.
PASTRAPIDSFAN, or should I say current Rapids hater? You've been nothing but negative concerning GR lately. What's the deal? If you were at the game today, and you know anything about hockey, you would have seen a game that GR clearly controlled everywhere except the scoreboard. They made a few mistakes along the way, as all teams do, but overall played very well. Today was one of those days where the puck just wouldn't go in, and the Anoka goaltender played very well. Anyone who reads this, don't let anyone tell you that Anoka played a great game and dominated GR. It just didn't happen. I would be comfortable to see Rapids meet that team again in the playoffs. PASTFAN, get off Rapids back, those kids are playing tough.

Another thing. No one out there can tell me that Anoka dominated or played a great game. GR was all over them, especially in the 2nd where they outshot them 14-1. Overall, the shots were 35-16. Anoka scores two garbage goals. Screen through traffic, weak shot, weak upper corner goal from way out that Underwood simply misplayed. As for the Anoka "big three" GR consistently had better players than those guys on the ice at all times.
Character is who you are when no one is watching
INDIAN°
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Iron Range(GR)

Post by INDIAN° »

grindiangrad-80 wrote:They are gonna have to find a way to bury the puck.
Did they have many chances today?
There were a few times that i couldn't beleive that the puck just didnt find its way into the net for GR!

>One problem for tonights game was the refing..it could have been a little better.

But rapids seemed to play VERY well in the 2nd/3rd periods, i was shocked they didnt pull off a win here.
Orange N' Black
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

GR3343 wrote:
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:
grindiangrad-80 wrote:I agree.
1 problem the way rapids plays they dont deserve the 3 spot.
PASTRAPIDSFAN, or should I say current Rapids hater? You've been nothing but negative concerning GR lately. What's the deal? If you were at the game today, and you know anything about hockey, you would have seen a game that GR clearly controlled everywhere except the scoreboard. They made a few mistakes along the way, as all teams do, but overall played very well. Today was one of those days where the puck just wouldn't go in, and the Anoka goaltender played very well. Anyone who reads this, don't let anyone tell you that Anoka played a great game and dominated GR. It just didn't happen. I would be comfortable to see Rapids meet that team again in the playoffs. PASTFAN, get off Rapids back, those kids are playing tough.
Well for the record ive been a die hard fan longer than most and know more about hockey than most sitting in those stands.I was at the game and what i saw was horrible,they have no discipline,cant make passes,best gut shooting team ive seen,Anoka controlled 90 percent of the game, we were chasing themthey had us running in circles,we did have a few shots but none that were quality.we couldnt even control there top 3 players9,19,29.They also controlled our powerplays.I will give credit to underwood this game could have been worse.I will not get off there back till i see improvement.So GR3343 you must have been in the other rink watching a diffent game.
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

from my vantage point up at the glass, one thing that I did notice was that GR seemed a little bunched up at times. Other then that they just couldn't put the puck in the net. Rapids had alot of opportunities in the 2nd. and 3rd but just couldn't capitalize on the chances.
As for meeting Anoka in the playoffs, that would be great!!! I believe Rapids will bounce back from this.

All in all it was a flat game to watch, but I believe Rapids should of won this game.
INDIAN°
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Iron Range(GR)

Post by INDIAN° »

Well for the record ive been a die hard fan longer than most and know more about hockey than most sitting in those stands.I was at the game and what i saw was horrible,they have no discipline,cant make passes,best gut shooting team ive seen,Anoka controlled 90 percent of the game, we were chasing themthey had us running in circles,we did have a few shots but none that were quality.we couldnt even control there top 3 players9,19,29.They also controlled our powerplays.I will give credit to underwood this game could have been worse.I will not get off there back till i see improvement.So GR3343 you must have been in the other rink watching a diffent game.[/quote]

I dont think we were watchin the same game, for one anoka did not have overall control of thee puck 90% of the time, it was more a 60/40.
Orange N' Black
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

If we would have controlled 40% we would have scored.I will correct and say they controlled the major part of the game we did have a few good flurries,but we couldnt put it home.We need to shoot more.QUALITY
The Hammer
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by The Hammer »

PastRapids fan I'm not sure what game you were watching -probably the same game that referee Tok was watching and it wasn't the GR/Anoka game.
As usual when Tok is on the ice GR has an additional opponent to contend with.
The other official Lagergren is an excellent official and did a good job.

B.Tok, a Greenway diehard, should not be allowed to officiate any GR games.
GR dominated the offensive play 75% to 25% in this game. They had many, many good scoring opportunities.
The Anoka goalie was the difference in this game.
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

I thought Rapids made the goalie look good.
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

The Hammer wrote:PastRapids fan I'm not sure what game you were watching -probably the same game that referee Tok was watching and it wasn't the GR/Anoka game.
As usual when Tok is on the ice GR has an additional opponent to contend with.
The other official Lagergren is an excellent official and did a good job.

B.Tok, a Greenway diehard, should not be allowed to officiate any GR games.
GR dominated the offensive play 75% to 25% in this game. They had many, many good scoring opportunities.
The Anoka goalie was the difference in this game.
I agree Tok is horrible but 75/25 :lol: :lol: :lol: Rapids has lost steam since earlier in the year and needs to turn the heat on soon.
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

I agree Tok is horrible but 75/25 :lol: :lol: :lol: Rapids has lost steam since earlier in the year and needs to turn the heat on soon.[/quote]

Couldn't agree with you more! rapids needs to get it together really soon. I believe they will, just hope it is not to late. On a side note. Anoka is a really good Hockey team. It should be an interesting 7AA Playoffs.
Dull Blades
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:01 am

Post by Dull Blades »

GR3343, gotta agree with pastrapidsfan....I said a couple weeks ago it was do or die time and you thought not so quick.... How bout now? Will you give me it today? Really, no kidding, it is do or die time. Anoka came here to win and did just that. Unfortunately, yes Anoka did control most aspects of the game. Maybe not dominate, but certainly had control. Rapids was close on several chances and, looked better than we have seen as of late which is good.

It takes more than ZERO goals to win.

The boys are playing good. Just not good enough. Its emotional for all of us to watch.

Its 3, maybe 4 seed folks.
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

Indians forever wrote:I agree Tok is horrible but 75/25 :lol: :lol: :lol: Rapids has lost steam since earlier in the year and needs to turn the heat on soon.
Couldn't agree with you more! rapids needs to get it together really soon. I believe they will, just hope it is not to late. On a side note. Anoka is a really good Hockey team. It should be an interesting 7AA Playoffs.[/quote]

Thank You
If they dont I can see 3 possibe 4 more losses befor playoffs
northernnett
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:49 pm

Post by northernnett »

Is that like Makinen reffin' a Greenway game? :roll:
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

I think other then the loss to Flake you can't argue Rapids getting anything lower then a 3 seed. I think it will be #1 Anoka, #2 East (not sure if they deserve it or not)? and #3 to Rapids due to the tie and win over Cloquet.
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

Indians forever wrote:I thought Rapids made the goalie look good.
I agee alot of gut shots,Ive been complaining about there shooting all year
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

Indians forever wrote:I think other then the loss to Flake you can't argue Rapids getting anything lower then a 3 seed. I think it will be #1 Anoka, #2 East (not sure if they deserve it or not)? and #3 to Rapids due to the tie and win over Cloquet.
East should get 1 they beat anoka then anoka 2 then rapids 3 cloquet 4
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:
Indians forever wrote:I think other then the loss to Flake you can't argue Rapids getting anything lower then a 3 seed. I think it will be #1 Anoka, #2 East (not sure if they deserve it or not)? and #3 to Rapids due to the tie and win over Cloquet.
East should get 1 they beat anoka then anoka 2 then rapids 3 cloquet 4
I stand corrected!! :oops:
hockey59
Posts: 1704
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:01 am

Anoka vs. GR

Post by hockey59 »

INDIAN° wrote:
grindiangrad-80 wrote:They are gonna have to find a way to bury the puck.
Did they have many chances today?
>One problem for tonights game was the refing..it could have been a little better.

But rapids seemed to play VERY well in the 2nd/3rd periods, i was shocked they didnt pull off a win here.
You really can't be serious as a Rapids fan saying the reffing could have been better :lol: :lol: :lol:

After Anoka converted on both their 1st period powerplay opportunities...the refs called 8 or 9 penalites on Anoka to 1 or 2 calls against GR...(with one on each being coincidental) and the other call being halfway through a GR power-play...clearly some of the calls against Anoka were very marginal...GR couldn't have got better reffing today at the IRA...unless the normal standard at the IRA is to only call penalties on the road team. :P
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Re: Anoka vs. GR

Post by Indians forever »

hockey59 wrote:
INDIAN° wrote:
grindiangrad-80 wrote:They are gonna have to find a way to bury the puck.
Did they have many chances today?
>One problem for tonights game was the refing..it could have been a little better.

But rapids seemed to play VERY well in the 2nd/3rd periods, i was shocked they didnt pull off a win here.
You really can't be serious as a Rapids fan saying the reffing could have been better :lol: :lol: :lol:

After Anoka converted on both their 1st period powerplay opportunities...the refs called 8 or 9 penalites on Anoka to 1 or 2 calls against GR...(with one on each being coincidental) and the other call being halfway through a GR power-play...clearly some of the calls against Anoka were very marginal...GR couldn't have got better reffing today at the IRA...unless the normal standard at the IRA is to only call penalties on the road team. :P
I Haven't seen alot of Rapids games latetly, but I do know that from past experiences when Tok is reffing he shows himself off. Today I don't think that happend for the most part. Hell, at times Rapids was better off not being on the power play. I did notice Anoka being a little chippy, I know that Bruce will adjust his players for the possible re-match come late Feb.
The Hammer
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by The Hammer »

Any word on Palkki.

He took a cheap shot along the boards late in the first period and never returned.


The power play was off today with Palkki sidelined with an injury.
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

The Hammer wrote:Any word on Palkki.

He took a cheap shot along the boards late in the first period and never returned.


The power play was off today with Palkki sidelined with an injury.
Good question I missed it. What happend???
The Hammer
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by The Hammer »

His head hit the boards pretty hard on a blindside check.
He was down for a few seconds before getting up.
I fear he had another concussion. If so that's bad news for GR.
doalie20
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by doalie20 »

i believe he suffered a concusion but im not positive on that, just what i heard
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

The Hammer wrote:His head hit the boards pretty hard on a blindside check.
He was down for a few seconds before getting up.
I fear he had another concussion. If so that's bad news for GR.
not good. When did he have his first?
The Milk Man
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:30 pm
Location: Iron Range

Post by The Milk Man »

I was at the game and thought it was possibly the worst reffed game i have ever seen in my entire life TOK was a complete joke Grant Prokop broke his stick and he went to toss it in the bench and a part of the stick landed away from the box and TOK made a rapids player leave the nech to pick it up while he stood right over the stick. He could not have been a bigger prick.
Post Reply