Thunderhawks 7AA verse the Brainerd Warriors of 8AA

5 Hole · Post by **5 Hole** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:19 pm

Syd Barrett wrote:
By the way how'd your fantasy team do yesterday

Syd

Tell ya what Sydney, you're a real comedian

. . . I'm getting over it now

Back to hockey. . .

First line will get their 2-4 goals, but it will be key for lines 2 and 3 to stay even strength, or the Warriors will have a struggle at their hands

great hockey mind · Post by **great hockey mind** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:07 am

from what i have seen the 3rd line plays very little and I do not think that will change.

lampthelight · Post by **lampthelight** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:00 am

Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?

The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.

I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.

Indian Head · Post by **Indian Head** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:21 pm

lampthelight wrote:
Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?
The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.

I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.

What change would that be?

5 Hole · Post by **5 Hole** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:11 pm

Indian Head wrote:
lampthelight wrote:
Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?
The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.

I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.
What change would that be?

. . .Probably something involving his son

Syd Barrett · Post by **Syd Barrett** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:18 pm

5 Hole wrote:. . .Probably something involving his son

That narrows it down to 3 and I'll bet it ain't the guy from Pequot

Syd

lampthelight · Post by **lampthelight** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:20 pm

Syd Barrett wrote:
5 Hole wrote:. . .Probably something involving his son
That narrows it down to 3 and I'll bet it ain't the guy from Pequot

Syd

You guys are clueless.

Yes, I think changes could be made to the lines to make them better, but i could be wrong. These may be the best 2nd and 3rd lines Brainerd can put together. I just have a tough time believing that when they have rarely scored in the first 3 games. It might just be the players that they have to choose from. Not a lot of talent with the puck on these lines, tough to get production out of both of them. Lucky to get it out of one. I'd put the top 3 guys with the puck together on 2nd line, and have the other 3 become a defensive specialist line.

Any other questions from the Brainerd "Brain Trust"?

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:00 pm

I will attempt to do my best posting updates tonight. Also check grhshockey.com for more info.

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:55 pm

Grand Rapis goes up 1-0.

Rendle from Roy on the PP.

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:02 pm

Brainerd ties it at one. Swanson from Engel and Monda

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:10 pm

Olson from Frazer and it is 2-1 Brainerd.

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:15 pm

Brainerd 2
Grand Rapids 1

End of 1st

Shots:
Brainerd 13
Grand Rapids 9

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:21 pm

whos in net bobleee

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:23 pm

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:whos in net bobleee

Underwood-GR
Mimmack-BR

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:25 pm

sounds good

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:29 pm

Grand Rapids 3
Brainerd 2

Rapids goes:

1:04 Palkki from Moore and Kleinendorst
2:25 Greniger from Bishop

Thehockeyplaya · Post by **Thehockeyplaya** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:32 pm

Anyone here know how much Tate Rusk is playing this year? What line and such?

5 Hole · Post by **5 Hole** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:38 pm

Thehockeyplaya wrote:Anyone here know how much Tate Rusk is playing this year? What line and such?

I hear he's the fifth defensemen, behind Olson, Swanson, Ring, Korte

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:52 pm

Rapids 4-2 roy

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:54 pm

That must have been real late in the period.

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:56 pm

yes, it came with 8 seconds left.

Roy from Skrbec and Rendle

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:57 pm

like 25 seconds left, they had penaltys at 34 seconds

grindiangrad-80 · Post by **grindiangrad-80** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:57 pm

Thats a big one on the road.

PASTRAPIDSFAN · Post by **PASTRAPIDSFAN** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:58 pm

I was off a few seconds

boblee · Post by **boblee** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:59 pm

Grand Rapids 4
Brainerd 2

End of 2nd

Shots:
Grand Rapids 21
Brainerd 17

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Thunderhawks 7AA verse the Brainerd Warriors of 8AA

post 8797

post 8813

post 8814

post 8816

post 8819

post 8822

post 8825

Brainerd

Re: Brainerd

post 8827

post 8828