I do agree with you. Having a option is always good!
Right now the only "option" is the Fire - and it's a good one.
Minnesota winter AAA teams...??Would be nice, but I don't see that happening, but then again what the hell do I know..

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Rocket78 wrote:Why do so many posters hate MNHockey so much and come up with all of this crap. Our system is the envy of hockey programs around the US. There are several individuals on this board and on the HC board that are part of "private" programs around the country that have stated that they would love to have the system we have. One guy coaches for Assabet Valley MA (perrenial girls national champions at 12U, 14U and 19U) and he consistently has mentioned that he would love it if they had our system. Their kids have to travel all over the east coast to play and we complain about driving to New Prague. Many of them actually play on their travel team and then on a local (I think they call it rep hockey) team.
Regarding the age of the MN Hockey board, I suspect that most of them don't start those positions until their kids have finished their youth hockey years. That will generally mean that they will be over 35. Are we going to discriminate against them due to their age? Hey, I have an idea, let's outsource their positions to CHINA or INDIA! Many of the coaches and hyper interested parents leave youth hockey as their kids leave bantams so they can watch their kids play on their high school team. When their last kid graduates from high school they tend to drift into more important things like playing in a Texas Hold 'Em league rather than volunteering their time to further the youth program.
watchdog - feisty today, aren't we. keep on posting your good humour.watchdog wrote:i for one am sick and tierd of hearing about the machine and the blades higher level ect..... who cares let me clue you in their not that good. hell my kid playes for the junior islanders in the summer (they never practice) they get together in the summer for 4 or 5 tourneys and thats it. they played the great blades team at the meltdown and got homerd by the refs or they would have beat the "great ones" without a team practice!!!!! guess that tells you the talent level of the players. next thing is if you take the best peewee and bantam teams in the state association teams they could at any given time beat either one of those so called super teams. all you have their is a good group of players piled on one team and they practice all the time. alot of the summer teams they play dont practice thats the diffrence. the other kids dont get total cohesive and they loose their legs because their not skating 3 or 4 times a week. now if you change to triple a all the time how many teams are you gona make that are considerd triple a? 10 or 12 all in the metro? lets wake up here and get a clue. the other part of all this is alot of parents have little johnny the superstar in the 95 level but when he has to goto peewee this year as a first years hes average. its good for your kid to work alittle he doesnt have to be the super stud all the time. we have the best system in the country and its time to appriciate it and stop whinning.
wheels wrote:Rocket78 wrote:Why do so many posters hate MNHockey so much and come up with all of this crap. Our system is the envy of hockey programs around the US. There are several individuals on this board and on the HC board that are part of "private" programs around the country that have stated that they would love to have the system we have. One guy coaches for Assabet Valley MA (perrenial girls national champions at 12U, 14U and 19U) and he consistently has mentioned that he would love it if they had our system. Their kids have to travel all over the east coast to play and we complain about driving to New Prague. Many of them actually play on their travel team and then on a local (I think they call it rep hockey) team.
Regarding the age of the MN Hockey board, I suspect that most of them don't start those positions until their kids have finished their youth hockey years. That will generally mean that they will be over 35. Are we going to discriminate against them due to their age? Hey, I have an idea, let's outsource their positions to CHINA or INDIA! Many of the coaches and hyper interested parents leave youth hockey as their kids leave bantams so they can watch their kids play on their high school team. When their last kid graduates from high school they tend to drift into more important things like playing in a Texas Hold 'Em league rather than volunteering their time to further the youth program.
You guys are missing the point on this whole discussion. These two are tied together.
Here is what happens in Minnesota Association Hockey.
1st kid in family starts hockey. Dad helps out for first couple years in initiation clinic (he played all the way up to c peewees so he really knows what he is doing). Family gets mad that their 90 pound mite got screwed in mite ratings (even though he can't bend his knees while he is skating). Mom or Dad runs for board along with a few other parents who's "kids got screwed". They get elected and now there is big trouble in board room.
Old boys who have been running board get out voted on some issues. They are ticked off.
The new folks on the board base all their decisions on what would benefit their own kid and with what they are familiar with, usually mites or squirts. Can you see the whole picture coming together yet???
Finally other families see the turmoil around this whole clown show. The Squirt coach is runing off with one of the moms, the evaluations were fixed, the high school coach is running the Bantam coach out of town and taking over the program. Their older kid, whos best friend went to Hill, is caught in the Bantams or Highschool choice, and the PeeWee coach is an idiot who only practices cycling. So Dad says to Little Joey their 2nd son who is going to be a PeeWee, "lets go try the Fire". So off they go. Little Joey gets alot of ice, meets some new friends, and they put 6000 extra miles on the old Caprice Wagon.
Now the other families from the association won't talk to them because they deserted the team.
Many places the hockey boards are run by people who are in their 30's with little or no organized sports experience. I don't know anyone on a single hockey board that doesn't have kids in the program.
So to wrap up my little glimpse into the real world of association hockey I'll say that, Minnesota Hockey is great in some places and is not that great in others, it's not the envy of the hockey world and should not be the only choice people have. It's too easy for the associations to be taken over by the people with the loudest voice instead of the ones with the most thoughtful voice and most sports experience and thats what ruins it for everyone.
So Rocket, after a few kids through hockey from Mites to High School, do you really expect someone to volinteer for more of the hockey board kind of fun rather than, oh I don't know...pick anything??????
Great question.54fighting wrote:Watchdog,
.....
The one question that I have asked a number of times on this forum and still have not gotten an answer to is this:
If your local association is only capable of skating a team at the B1-B2 level and you happen to be a very skilled player ( talking 2nd year peewee or bantam not squirts) what do you do?
Is it fair to make everyone in the association try to play up at the level of that player or is it fair to make that player skate down at a level that will offer very few challenges in games or practices? Tough call.
.....
This is where I think having the option of a AAA program in MN makes sense.
Again, just my opinion.
Mister Hockey wrote:How can we be the envy when none of our winter teams can compete in a National tournament at the end of the year??? Since some of our players are too old at every level the teams can not travel to a National Tournament. I believe if it is hosted by a Minnesota team they can participate.
Because Minnesota operates essentially "on an island" separate from the rest of USA Hockey, it can do whatever it wants. The rest of the country has to follow, with the exception of possibly Detroit and Massachusetts, so their member teams have someone to play.Mister Hockey wrote:How can we be the envy when none of our winter teams can compete in a National tournament at the end of the year???
And since the rest of the teams are outside of Minnesota they aren't eligible to play in the Minnesota state tournament.Since some of our players are too old at every level the teams can not travel to a National Tournament.
These are two different things. I'll tackle the Olympics first. In 2006 there were 4 Minnesotans (Hedican, Leopold, Blake, Parrish) out of 23 players. Yes, this is low. In 2002 it was very low. Was it just Housley? Herb Brooks was coach!I believe if it is hosted by a Minnesota team they can participate. A friend and myself were just noticing how few Minnesota Players are on our National team and Junior teams anymore. Heck the last Olympic team I think only 1 or 2 were from here.
And people in Minnesota shouldn't think about the rest of the country.People around the country don't even think about Minnesota because they never can play them in the Winter.
watchdog gets itwatchdog wrote:i for one am sick and tierd of hearing about the machine and the blades higher level ect..... who cares let me clue you in their not that good. hell my kid playes for the junior islanders in the summer (they never practice) they get together in the summer for 4 or 5 tourneys and thats it. they played the great blades team at the meltdown and got homerd by the refs or they would have beat the "great ones" without a team practice!!!!! guess that tells you the talent level of the players. next thing is if you take the best peewee and bantam teams in the state association teams they could at any given time beat either one of those so called super teams. all you have their is a good group of players piled on one team and they practice all the time. alot of the summer teams they play dont practice thats the diffrence. the other kids dont get total cohesive and they loose their legs because their not skating 3 or 4 times a week. now if you change to triple a all the time how many teams are you gona make that are considerd triple a? 10 or 12 all in the metro? lets wake up here and get a clue. the other part of all this is alot of parents have little johnny the superstar in the 95 level but when he has to goto peewee this year as a first years hes average. its good for your kid to work alittle he doesnt have to be the super stud all the time. we have the best system in the country and its time to appriciate it and stop whinning.
Come On ? even for Mites???breakout wrote:watchdog gets itwatchdog wrote:i for one am sick and tierd of hearing about the machine and the blades higher level ect..... who cares let me clue you in their not that good. hell my kid playes for the junior islanders in the summer (they never practice) they get together in the summer for 4 or 5 tourneys and thats it. they played the great blades team at the meltdown and got homerd by the refs or they would have beat the "great ones" without a team practice!!!!! guess that tells you the talent level of the players. next thing is if you take the best peewee and bantam teams in the state association teams they could at any given time beat either one of those so called super teams. all you have their is a good group of players piled on one team and they practice all the time. alot of the summer teams they play dont practice thats the diffrence. the other kids dont get total cohesive and they loose their legs because their not skating 3 or 4 times a week. now if you change to triple a all the time how many teams are you gona make that are considerd triple a? 10 or 12 all in the metro? lets wake up here and get a clue. the other part of all this is alot of parents have little johnny the superstar in the 95 level but when he has to goto peewee this year as a first years hes average. its good for your kid to work alittle he doesnt have to be the super stud all the time. we have the best system in the country and its time to appriciate it and stop whinning.
Jancze:jancze5 wrote:The option of Minnesota AAA would be nice, but as I believe OTOWNCLOWN down in FLorida has eluded to...the reality to me is that the TC's could realistically support 2-3 AAA teams MAX. And these teams would have to try to get into the MWEHL (based in Detroit/Chicago). So, is the travel in the winter worth it?
wheels wrote:Oh really.... I guess I thought it was about winter AAA vs MNHOCK in the winter.elliott70 wrote:Someone missed the topic of the post(s). (And it was not Rocket.)
Holy Angels coaching staff was there in force...O-townClown wrote:Which is bigger? I went to see Centennial play Edina in the Bantam final 20 months ago and it was PACKED.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...............HA..HA..HA..HANeutron 14 wrote:Holy Angels coaching staff was there in force...O-townClown wrote:Which is bigger? I went to see Centennial play Edina in the Bantam final 20 months ago and it was PACKED.![]()
True!