1a predictions

wild4ever35 · Post by **wild4ever35** » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:45 pm

also you can't say a goalie with no varsity experience is one of the top goalies either. I agree with Waalkens from Albert Lea he was a very solid goalie arguably better than Casanova last year. i think we can agree that theres not a lot of experienced goalies this year with the departures of Donohue from Mayo, Trembley from West, etc.

slapnasty · Post by **slapnasty** » Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:29 pm

Cool down Dominator I'm just giving ya some crap haha just some regular hockey trash talk dont get so defensove its fun man. And I know Palma played against Little Falls he played every game but 3 I just said that meaning the team not the goalie. Im also not saying just because Waalkens and Scudamore are 1,2 goaltenders in the section because of theyve played varsity before, I just think they are better than Bruggemeyer now until I see different. Im just giving New Prague some crfap because it seems like they have 5 players on here and having one person say something and the other 4 agree.

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:15 am

slapnasty wrote:Cool down Dominator I'm just giving ya some crap haha just some regular hockey trash talk dont get so defensove its fun man. And I know Palma played against Little Falls he played every game but 3 I just said that meaning the team not the goalie. Im also not saying just because Waalkens and Scudamore are 1,2 goaltenders in the section because of theyve played varsity before, I just think they are better than Bruggemeyer now until I see different. Im just giving New Prague some crfap because it seems like they have 5 players on here and having one person say something and the other 4 agree.

GabT is Bruggeman

gabT · Post by **gabT** » Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:45 pm

What??

NDfightingirish35 · Post by **NDfightingirish35** » Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:59 pm

GabT=Not Bruggeman

I know what his name is but you don't need to.

No I'm not him.

greenline · Post by **greenline** » Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:10 pm

Dominator I think New Prague is good. But because west lost one game 9-2 doesn't mean they won't be a contender this year. They have all their returning scorers back thats usually a good thing.

THEDOMINATOR39 · Post by **THEDOMINATOR39** » Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:53 pm

Your right but the impression i got from that game just led me to believe that they werent very good, but after seeing scores they put up against other teams im thinking that may have just been an off night.

davey · Post by **davey** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:28 am

I still say that this Section is wide open between 4-5 teams

Lourdes-Nice group of Juniors. Goaltending somewhat inconsistent.
AL - typical hardworking Roy Nystrom Group led by Woodside and Waalkens
NP- lots of firepower back Goaltending?
RW- nice group of juniors led by Schammel
West- Like most of the teams they have Proven goal scorers. Need Dmen to step up. Has to happen this year because the tank runs a little dry after this year.

tpshockey30 · Post by **tpshockey30** » Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:51 pm

Judging by all of this talk! I hope this season is as wide open as everyone says! Cause if it is, its gonna be an awsome season no doubt, i espeacialy like the new teams! Hopefully Ill have the privalage in playing them! I have no predictions on this years section champs and what not, there are some tricky teams

in this section that if you get to cocky they could beat you one game, then that could change your whole season. Beleive me it has!

toedrag21 · Post by **toedrag21** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:32 pm

futureeagle wrote:i dont see how you could have red wing at the top when they were missing maybe one person in lacressent they went into overtime with austin which is a less then average team actually austin is pretty horrible but we will see what happens we can all have our own opinions

Red Wing was missing two of their top scorers from last year, one of them who plays on the Southeast Elite team, their top defenseman, two of last years third liners, and their fourth string goalie who has never played A hockey was in net. It was not their team at all.

tpshockey30 · Post by **tpshockey30** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:16 pm

swats10 wrote:Austin
Albert Lea
Mankato West
Mankato East
La Crescent
New Prague
Red Wing
Northfield
Lourdes
Waseca
Fairbault
St. Peter

nice try Swatzy haha

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:01 pm

NDfightingirish35 wrote:GabT=Not Bruggeman

I know what his name is but you don't need to.

No I'm not him.

Is Mankato full of liars?

tpshockey30 · Post by **tpshockey30** » Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:36 am

whats lacresents hockey like? never heard of them

merritt29 · Post by **merritt29** » Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:50 pm

tpshockey30 wrote:
swats10 wrote:Austin
Albert Lea
Mankato West
Mankato East
La Crescent
New Prague
Red Wing
Northfield
Lourdes
Waseca
Fairbault
St. Peter
nice try Swatzy haha

i don't think those are his predictions i think he was giving the names of the teams in the section... i mean come on do u really think he ment austin to be first...?

fubar-errr-what · Post by **fubar-errr-what** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:33 am

merritt---you guys might when 8 games and thats generous because i am not sure if you will beat east, winona, marshall, windom, waseca, dodge county...

swats10 · Post by **swats10** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:29 pm

TPS, about la crescent, not a very quick or skilled team, but they skate hard and like to hit imo they will be a bottom seeded team in this section but you never know how things will pan out

tpshockey30 · Post by **tpshockey30** » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:50 pm

I don't even think I know were La Cresent is! But im sure that I will see them at one point in the season

Rocket78 · Post by **Rocket78** » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:06 pm

La Crescent is across the Mississippi from LaCrosse WI. They generally have one youth 'B' team in each level of district 8. Last year they played bantam C and made it to the championship game although I can't remember who won or who they played (Farmington?).

merritt29 · Post by **merritt29** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:09 am

fubar-errr-what wrote:merritt---you guys might when 8 games and thats generous because i am not sure if you will beat east, winona, marshall, windom, waseca, dodge county...

and your point is?

wild4ever35 · Post by **wild4ever35** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:50 pm

Albert Lea
Lourdes
Red Wing
Mankato West
Northfield
Northfield
Mankato East
Fairbault
Waseca
New Prague
Austin
La Crescent

wild4ever35 · Post by **wild4ever35** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:51 pm

Albert Lea
Lourdes
Red Wing
Mankato West
Northfield
Mankato East
Fairbault
Waseca
New Prague
Austin
La Crescent

my bad northfield must have been on my mind

gabT · Post by **gabT** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:13 pm

Wild4ever,
I hope you were kidding...There is no way that New Prague will finish out of the top 3 let alone behind Faribault, Mankato East, Waseca, and Northfield. The top four next year will be AL NP West and Lourdes. Just don't know the order that they are going to go in.

wild4ever35 · Post by **wild4ever35** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm

youre pretty confident about your team Mankato West aren't ya

merritt29 · Post by **merritt29** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:50 pm

west is good but there not great... they get too cocky thats why they lost to new ulm

gabT · Post by **gabT** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:55 pm

West is a whole new team this year. Believe it or not.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

1a predictions

Re: New 1a

Re: New 1a

Re: New 1a

La Crescent

Re: New 1a