GINO GUYER REGIONAL 2 V 3
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
GINO GUYER REGIONAL 2 V 3
Which current MN HS hockey player is more now?
2) Nick Oliver (Roseau)
3) Tyler Barnes (Burnsville)
2) Nick Oliver (Roseau)
3) Tyler Barnes (Burnsville)
I'll agree with you on the better head coaching part, but to say Barnes is a much better player is a little bold. Oliver has a much bigger upside than Barnes. FYI...Oliver has very good coaching, just not his head coach. I believe his father is a very good motivator, just not very good at the X's and O's of hockey. That's Billy's job. My vote is for Nick. I'm looking for a pretty huge season from this kid.warrior4 wrote:Tyler Barnes is much better - Better player with better coaching
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:56 pm
This is quite the interesting matchup. Tyler Barnes is overshadowed by teammate Jake hendrickson and goaltender randy Jonsons steller play at the state tournament. To be honest the whole scott oliver coaching things going on up in roseau brought alot of hype and attention to nick oliver. and being on a state championship team this past year doesnt hurt either. with all the scott oliver questions going on people started questioning what nick was gunna do. whether ann arbor or roseau or move where his father was going to teach. I feel bad for barnes on this becase oliver is good don get me wrong but all his hype has been brought about becasue of his father. but once again hype is hype, Oliver moves on in a tight one.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:55 pm
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
- Location: St. Cloud MN
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
- Location: St. Cloud MN
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:31 pm
- Location: van down by the river
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
MY VOTE GOES TO BARNES
DID EVERYBODY FORGET ABOUT BARNES PERFORMANCE AT LAST YEARS STATE TOURNEY? LOUIE NANNE COULD NOT SAY ENOUGH ABOUT HIM. BARNES IS A GAMER AND PLAYS HIS BEST HOCKEY IN THE BIGGEST GAMES. HE ALSO GOES UP AGAINST BETTER COMPETITION NIGHT AFTER NIGHT AND GETS MY VOTE OVER OLIVER.
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
Re: MY VOTE GOES TO BARNES
Not a very good arguement because the Lake conference was terrible last year. In addition, Burnsville was 2-6 against non-conference opponents and that includes the wins against Holy Angels and Blaine in the sectionals and State Tournament. They went 1-2 in the State Tournament. Lake conference will be much better this year. Oliver will increase his productivity and Barnes will struggle to score 54 points again.welleman wrote:DID EVERYBODY FORGET ABOUT BARNES PERFORMANCE AT LAST YEARS STATE TOURNEY? LOUIE NANNE COULD NOT SAY ENOUGH ABOUT HIM. BARNES IS A GAMER AND PLAYS HIS BEST HOCKEY IN THE BIGGEST GAMES. HE ALSO GOES UP AGAINST BETTER COMPETITION NIGHT AFTER NIGHT AND GETS MY VOTE OVER OLIVER.
You wouldnt happen to live in Roseau would you? Even in a down year I would argue the Lake provides better competition....but if you don't like that one, i have a million more....Look at last years stats....Oliver finished 8th on his own team in scoring....not that he wasn't deserving of much defensive attention....but they couldnt afford too as the Rams had too many other snipers capable of finding the back of the net. The Barnes/Hendrickson line always faced the opponents best checking line. Barnes had guys draped all over him all year long and still managed to put up great numbers. Just an observation from a neutral observer.
post 8180
Not so true. Many teams just matched top lines with that combo. And many top lines are not the top checking line.welleman wrote:You wouldnt happen to live in Roseau would you? Even in a down year I would argue the Lake provides better competition....but if you don't like that one, i have a million more....Look at last years stats....Oliver finished 8th on his own team in scoring....not that he wasn't deserving of much defensive attention....but they couldnt afford too as the Rams had too many other snipers capable of finding the back of the net. The Barnes/Hendrickson line always faced the opponents best checking line. Barnes had guys draped all over him all year long and still managed to put up great numbers. Just an observation from a neutral observer.
Whether Barnes is going up against the top line or the top checking line....my point is If I'm the other coach I tell my guys before the game that they better know where Barnes is at all times....I don't think I say the same about Oliver...not because he isnt a good player, but only because the Rams have so much firepower.
Last I checked Hockey was a team sport and not an individual one. Oliver did not win the title his team did - and it was a great season for the team. Player vs. Player- my vote is for Barnes.Indians forever wrote:Oliver won a State Championship. Did Barnes????easton stud wrote:Barnes made all state tourny team did oliver?
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
Re: post 8180
Barnes didnt have guys drapped on him at all. He hardly scored at all early in the first half of the season. Oliver is not afraid of the defensive zone either. Much more complete player with a MUCH brighter future.boblee wrote:Not so true. Many teams just matched top lines with that combo. And many top lines are not the top checking line.welleman wrote:You wouldnt happen to live in Roseau would you? Even in a down year I would argue the Lake provides better competition....but if you don't like that one, i have a million more....Look at last years stats....Oliver finished 8th on his own team in scoring....not that he wasn't deserving of much defensive attention....but they couldnt afford too as the Rams had too many other snipers capable of finding the back of the net. The Barnes/Hendrickson line always faced the opponents best checking line. Barnes had guys draped all over him all year long and still managed to put up great numbers. Just an observation from a neutral observer.
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:31 pm
- Location: van down by the river