Roseau vs. Roch. Century

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:39 pm

Century is a bunch of hacks!! Another cheap penalty. 2:15 1st.

Post by **east hockey** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:41 pm

who_b_dat wrote:Century is a bunch of hacks!! Another cheap penalty. 2:15 1st.

Dunno if cheap, but sure is dumb. Now 3-0.

Lee

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:42 pm

Rams capitalize on Century"s dumb penalties. 3-0 Rams :20 1st

Post by **east hockey** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:42 pm

who_b_dat wrote:Rams capitalize on Century"s dumb penalties. 3-0 Rams :20 1st

Ugh, reviewing it.

Lee

Zamboni Guy · Post by **Zamboni Guy** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:43 pm

NO GOAL.

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:43 pm

who_b_dat wrote:glad ya got that off you're chest

'TNKS'

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:44 pm

Always hard to see points come off the board but its the right call. Waiving this one keeps it a game for awhile.

pipersniper12 · Post by **pipersniper12** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:44 pm

Century got lucky. They are getting dominated.

Post by **east hockey** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:45 pm

Geez! So Century goes and takes another penalty. Rams will start the 2nd period on another power play with a chance to nearly put this one away.

Lee

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:46 pm

I wonder if Century's game plan is to skate 4 on 5 for awhile and then overpower the Rams when they play a smarter game and skate 5 ????

Zamboni Guy · Post by **Zamboni Guy** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:46 pm

Roseau - 2
Rochester Century - 0

END OF FIRST PERIOD

sachishi4 · Post by **sachishi4** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:46 pm

i think something should be done for that rule. With his skate barely in the crease and really having NOTHING to do with the shot i think it should have counted. Not that i think it will matter in this one, but still

pipersniper12 · Post by **pipersniper12** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:49 pm

If Century continues to take stupid penalties this will be a blow-out in no time.

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:49 pm

sachishi4 wrote:i think something should be done for that rule. With his sjate barely in the crease and really having NOTHING to do with the shot i think it should have counted. Not that i think it will matter in this one, but still

Same type of deal cost Warroad BIG TIME!

'TNKS' alot!

SEMinnHockeyNut · Post by **SEMinnHockeyNut** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:51 pm

Goldy - You are right about Wilcox - terrible yesterday, terrible 1st period tonight. Move your feet, move the puck, stay out of the box.
Same thing goes for Knutson as well.

I am hoping the Panthers keep it close...something like 5-3 would be decent.

As far as Faupel....great scoring touch, but will he be able to do it next year when his linemates will be Arens and Madden?

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:53 pm

I liked the little clips of the mic'd coaches. That Burnsville coach was impressive.

AngusYoung · Post by **AngusYoung** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:57 pm

slapshooter - be honest here. I've watched the Rams play both yesterday and this evening and they appear to be men amongst boys. I have not seen a team that has so many tic, tac, toe passes in a long time. They are the bees knees in this tourney and I don't think anybody will stop them. If the Spuds beat this team twice handily, this easily could have been their year to take the title. Any comments?

mrslasher · Post by **mrslasher** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:58 pm

Good point Nut, Faupel is doing what he needs to do since Knoepke and Grimstad have always been very good pinpoint passers around the net, it's all working out well for them. He doesn't create much but gets to the net exactly when he needs too. Arens is a very good player, those two should work out ok I think next year. Of course not like this year, but they will have some talent there, we'll see though.

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:59 pm

Just like it could have been another year for AHA. Woulda, coulda, shoulda ... This has been a unique tourney for AA.

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:05 pm

So will the Warroad people go and loot the homes of the Roseau folks since they will all be home a day earlier?

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:06 pm

who_b_dat wrote:So will the Warroad people go and loot the homes of the Roseau folks since they will all be home a day earlier?

Oh that right - they have Mariucci

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:11 pm

AngusYoung wrote:slapshooter - be honest here. I've watched the Rams play both yesterday and this evening and they appear to be men amongst boys. I have not seen a team that has so many tic, tac, toe passes in a long time. They are the bees knees in this tourney and I don't think anybody will stop them. If the Spuds beat this team twice handily, this easily could have been their year to take the title. Any comments?

Well Angus! If is a mighty big word!

S S

mrslasher · Post by **mrslasher** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:15 pm

Lou - 'I think Rochester needs more than 1 Bantam A team feeding 4 high schools.'

Hockeyguy_27 · Post by **Hockeyguy_27** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:17 pm

mrslasher wrote:Lou - 'I think Rochester needs more than 1 Bantam A team feeding 4 high schools.'

This could prove to be a problem. I can't believe a community with that many high school teams would only have one Bantam A team.

mrslasher · Post by **mrslasher** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:21 pm

A few parents with kids playing on those Bantam A and PWA teams with power that what GLORY, simple as that, nothing else...

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Roseau vs. Roch. Century

Roseau vs. Roch Century

7,164th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

7,165th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

7,166th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002