Section 1A

ilovelife23 · Post by **ilovelife23** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:44 am

first of all:just for your information bigbabyblue i am not joey olson
second of all: its pretty lame to make fun of someone for a simple typo
third of all: it was not a good decision in any possible way, he basically just gave up the game because the kids need discipline? well good job you sure showed them by losing their season and ending two pretty damn good players careers.
fourth of all: bigbabyblue i nor anybody likes you or your baby blue gloves

slapnasty · Post by **slapnasty** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:13 am

fourth of all: bigbabyblue i nor anybody likes you or your baby blue gloves

I will have to disagree with you Joey, whats wrong with bigbabyblue? I think hes great adds more character to this topic.

crash · Post by **crash** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:45 am

Why are their careers over? Are they not good enough to play Jr. hockey?

If they love hockey so much and they are good enough to make the step there is chances to play hockey at the next level.

logger · Post by **logger** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:32 am

crash wrote:Why are their careers over? Are they not good enough to play Jr. hockey?

If they love hockey so much and they are good enough to make the step there is chances to play hockey at the next level.

could be it's time for life to move on for them.

Is the problem with this team the players or coach? my guess is the coach won't be back next year.

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:09 am

logger wrote:
crash wrote:Why are their careers over? Are they not good enough to play Jr. hockey?

If they love hockey so much and they are good enough to make the step there is chances to play hockey at the next level.
could be it's time for life to move on for them.

Is the problem with this team the players or coach? my guess is the coach won't be back next year.

4 wins is not the coaches fault. It's the talent's fault.

bigbabyblue · Post by **bigbabyblue** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:56 am

time for joey to move on to cya later anyways waseca fought hard they had a nice shorthanded five hole goal in the first period shows they were hustling and they really wanted it....... obviously i am not the one with the baby blue gloves.........and we hate ZAMBONI so i will tell him what i want and he made the error on league twice so i firmly believe he didnt no how to spell it so i figured i would teach him!! anyways who plays who tomorrow night?!?!

p.s.--also joey know one likes you especially when you come on here and brag yourself up on how you attempted to make Walton flinch which you failed horribly...

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:04 am

bigbabyblue wrote:time for joey to move on to cya later anyways waseca fought hard they had a nice shorthanded five hole goal in the first period shows they were hustling and they really wanted it....... obviously i am not the one with the baby blue gloves.........and we hate ZAMBONI so i will tell him what i want and he made the error on league twice so i firmly believe he didnt no how to spell it so i figured i would teach him!! anyways who plays who tomorrow night?!?!

p.s.--also joey know one likes you especially when you come on here and brag yourself up on how you attempted to make Walton flinch which you failed horribly...

Baby blue: Careful who you start giving English lessons to, your usage is atrocious.

bugsy · Post by **bugsy** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:05 am

Bigbabyblue. I can assure you that ilovelife23 is not Joey

ilovelife23 · Post by **ilovelife23** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:24 am

bigbabyblue wrote:time for joey to move on to cya later anyways waseca fought hard they had a nice shorthanded five hole goal in the first period shows they were hustling and they really wanted it....... obviously i am not the one with the baby blue gloves.........and we hate ZAMBONI so i will tell him what i want and he made the error on league twice so i firmly believe he didnt no how to spell it so i figured i would teach him!! anyways who plays who tomorrow night?!?!

p.s.--also joey know one likes you especially when you come on here and brag yourself up on how you attempted to make Walton flinch which you failed horribly...

you're really smart mr bigbabyblue even tho he didnt KNOW how to spell it and NO one likes you... get your grammer right bud

and i am not joey olson otherwise i probably woulda gotten his number right the first time when i posted him and 12 had good games... think about it

stud-lee · Post by **stud-lee** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:34 am

ilovelife23, check your inbox.

LetsPlayHockey · Post by **LetsPlayHockey** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:54 pm

So now that the first round is over who do you think has the best chance to upset the 4 top seeds.
AL vs Waseca
Mankato West vs Windom
New Ulm vs Luverne
Marshall vs Austin

Absolutely no disrespect to New Ulm but the only team that I believe can upset one of these teams is Luverne. I remember hearing that they beat Marshall earlier in the year, that's the only reason I think that they have a chance to make a run at New Ulm. What does everyone else think about this assesment?

ilovelife23 · Post by **ilovelife23** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:59 pm

i think all top four seeds are going to win with a possibility of luvurne upseting new ulm but thats a pretty slim chance. thats my opinion

slapshooter · Post by **slapshooter** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:00 pm

Now that would be very interesting!

SS

bugsy · Post by **bugsy** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:20 pm

Top four seeds win handily setting up a Great Saturday afternoon of hockey. Hope the ice storm doesn't come as some are predicting

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:30 pm

If the storm does postpone games, does anyone with any insight know if an alternative has been discussed?

I would assume Tuesday the 27th, assuming GAC is available.

pondhockey07 · Post by **pondhockey07** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:05 pm

I'm thinking the top teams will all win. But there is always a chance a team could be looking ahead to the next game.

bigbabyblue · Post by **bigbabyblue** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:38 pm

my grammar is slang his grammar is just spelt wrong his was obviously not meant to be slang anyways back to hockey...

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:43 pm

bigbabyblue wrote:my grammar is slang his grammar is just spelt wrong his was obviously not meant to be slang anyways back to hockey...

Just use some punctuation please, your postings read like a meth head with ADHD.

grafmaster · Post by **grafmaster** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:40 pm

Someone start a "Grammar arguement forum" for people who actually care. 29 of the total 30 pages on here are arguing about things other than hockey. So please people, keep on topic!

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:44 pm

grafmaster wrote:Someone start a "Grammar arguement forum" for people who actually care. 29 of the total 30 pages on here are arguing about things other than hockey. So please people, keep on topic!

Grafmaster, did you have something to add about hockey?

People, if you're not going to be a part of the solution, then don't be a part of the problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

powerplay009 · Post by **powerplay009** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:58 pm

I'll get things started while you school girls fight

Predictions for tomorrow
AL 8, Waseca 2
West 7, Windom 1
New Ulm 4, Luverne 1
Marshall 6, Austin 1

logger · Post by **logger** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:04 pm

grafmaster wrote:Someone start a "Grammar arguement forum" for people who actually care. 29 of the total 30 pages on here are arguing about things other than hockey. So please people, keep on topic!

o;k enuf of this off topic stuff cuz were all hear to talk bout hockey not this other stuff and we shouldnt just be filling this space with anything other than hockey talk afterall who wants to read all this other stuff anyway.

Oh: top seeds wil all win unless of coarse luverne pull off a big one or i wouldn't rule out austin if they scor a couple cuz marshll has a hard time scoring but albert lee and mankato west are easy winners

golfreak · Post by **golfreak** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:05 pm

I'll take a stab at it...

AL- 10
Waseca- 0

West- 8
Windom- 1

Luverne- 2
New Ulm- 1

Marshall- 4
Austin- 2

Puckhandler · Post by **Puckhandler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:11 pm

Predictions:

AL- 8
Waseca- 1

West- 11
Windom- 2

Luverne- 1
New Ulm- 4

Marshall- 3
Austin- 0

hockeystar56784 · Post by **hockeystar56784** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:21 pm

Predictions:
AL-9
Waseca-1

West-5
Windom-3

Luverne-2
New Ulm-1

Marshall-5
Austin-1

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section 1A

6,803rd post by SS since Feb 27th 2002

Argue

Re: Argue

Re: Argue